Adi F Gazdar1, Trisha K Savage, Jane E Johnson, Anton Berns, Julien Sage, R Ilona Linnoila, David MacPherson, David G McFadden, Anna Farago, Tyler Jacks, William D Travis, Elisabeth Brambilla. 1. *Hamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research and Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; †Department of Neuroscience, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; ‡Cancer Genomics Centre, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; §Departments of Pediatrics and Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; ‖Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; ¶Division of Human Biology and Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; #David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142; **Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and ††Departementd'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, INSERM Unit 823, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Albert Michallon, and Institut Albert Bonniot University, Grenoble, France.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Because small-cell lung carcinomas (SCLC) are seldom resected, human materials for study are limited. Thus, genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) for SCLC and other high-grade lung neuroendocrine (NE) carcinomas are crucial for translational research. METHODS: The pathologies of five GEMMs were studied in detail and consensus diagnoses reached by four lung cancer pathology experts. Hematoxylin and Eosin and immunostained slides of over 100 mice were obtained from the originating and other laboratories and digitalized. The GEMMs included the original Rb/p53 double knockout (Berns Laboratory) and triple knockouts from the Sage, MacPherson, and Jacks laboratories (double knockout model plus loss of p130 [Sage laboratory] or loss of Pten [MacPherson and Jacks laboratories]). In addition, a GEMM with constitutive co-expression of SV40 large T antigen and Ascl1 under the Scgb1a1 promoter from the Linnoila laboratory were included. RESULTS: The lung tumors in all of the models had common as well as distinct pathological features. All three conditional knockout models resulted in multiple pulmonary tumors arising mainly from the central compartment (large bronchi) with foci of in situ carcinoma and NE cell hyperplasia. They consisted of inter- and intra-tumor mixtures of SCLC and large-cell NE cell carcinoma in varying proportions. Occasional adeno- or large-cell carcinomas were also seen. Extensive vascular and lymphatic invasion and metastases to the mediastinum and liver were noted, mainly of SCLC histology. In the Rb/p53/Pten triple knockout model from the MacPherson and Jacks laboratories and in the constitutive SV40/T antigen model many peripherally arising non-small-cell lung carcinoma tumors having varying degrees of NE marker expression were present (non-small-cell lung carcinoma-NE tumors). The resultant histological phenotypes were influenced by the introduction of specific genetic alterations, by inactivation of one or both alleles of specific genes, by time from Cre activation and by targeting of lung cells or NE cell subpopulations. CONCLUSION: The five GEMM models studied are representative for the entire spectrum of human high-grade NE carcinomas and are also useful for the study of multistage pathogenesis and the metastatic properties of these tumors. They represent one of the most advanced forms of currently available GEMM models for the study of human cancer.
INTRODUCTION: Because small-cell lung carcinomas (SCLC) are seldom resected, human materials for study are limited. Thus, genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) for SCLC and other high-grade lung neuroendocrine (NE) carcinomas are crucial for translational research. METHODS: The pathologies of five GEMMs were studied in detail and consensus diagnoses reached by four lung cancer pathology experts. Hematoxylin and Eosin and immunostained slides of over 100 mice were obtained from the originating and other laboratories and digitalized. The GEMMs included the original Rb/p53 double knockout (Berns Laboratory) and triple knockouts from the Sage, MacPherson, and Jacks laboratories (double knockout model plus loss of p130 [Sage laboratory] or loss of Pten [MacPherson and Jacks laboratories]). In addition, a GEMM with constitutive co-expression of SV40 large T antigen and Ascl1 under the Scgb1a1 promoter from the Linnoila laboratory were included. RESULTS: The lung tumors in all of the models had common as well as distinct pathological features. All three conditional knockout models resulted in multiple pulmonary tumors arising mainly from the central compartment (large bronchi) with foci of in situ carcinoma and NE cell hyperplasia. They consisted of inter- and intra-tumor mixtures of SCLC and large-cell NE cell carcinoma in varying proportions. Occasional adeno- or large-cell carcinomas were also seen. Extensive vascular and lymphatic invasion and metastases to the mediastinum and liver were noted, mainly of SCLC histology. In the Rb/p53/Pten triple knockout model from the MacPherson and Jacks laboratories and in the constitutive SV40/T antigen model many peripherally arising non-small-cell lung carcinomatumors having varying degrees of NE marker expression were present (non-small-cell lung carcinoma-NE tumors). The resultant histological phenotypes were influenced by the introduction of specific genetic alterations, by inactivation of one or both alleles of specific genes, by time from Cre activation and by targeting of lung cells or NE cell subpopulations. CONCLUSION: The five GEMM models studied are representative for the entire spectrum of human high-grade NE carcinomas and are also useful for the study of multistage pathogenesis and the metastatic properties of these tumors. They represent one of the most advanced forms of currently available GEMM models for the study of humancancer.
Authors: Diana N Ionescu; Diana Treaba; Cyril B Gilks; Samuel Leung; Daniel Renouf; Janessa Laskin; Richard Wood-Baker; Allen M Gown Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Bethany E Schaffer; Kwon-Sik Park; Gloria Yiu; Jamie F Conklin; Chenwei Lin; Deborah L Burkhart; Anthony N Karnezis; E Alejandro Sweet-Cordero; Julien Sage Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-04-20 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Selim M H Rizvi; Joseph Goodwill; Eric Lim; Yoong K Yap; Athol U Wells; David M Hansell; Peter Davis; Abdel-Ghani Selim; Syed Abdel-Ghani; Peter Goldstraw; Andrew G Nicholson Journal: Histopathology Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 5.087
Authors: Erin D Pleasance; Philip J Stephens; Sarah O'Meara; David J McBride; Alison Meynert; David Jones; Meng-Lay Lin; David Beare; King Wai Lau; Chris Greenman; Ignacio Varela; Serena Nik-Zainal; Helen R Davies; Gonzalo R Ordoñez; Laura J Mudie; Calli Latimer; Sarah Edkins; Lucy Stebbings; Lina Chen; Mingming Jia; Catherine Leroy; John Marshall; Andrew Menzies; Adam Butler; Jon W Teague; Jonathon Mangion; Yongming A Sun; Stephen F McLaughlin; Heather E Peckham; Eric F Tsung; Gina L Costa; Clarence C Lee; John D Minna; Adi Gazdar; Ewan Birney; Michael D Rhodes; Kevin J McKernan; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal; Peter J Campbell Journal: Nature Date: 2009-12-16 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Paul A Bunn; John D Minna; Alexander Augustyn; Adi F Gazdar; Youcef Ouadah; Mark A Krasnow; Anton Berns; Elisabeth Brambilla; Natasha Rekhtman; Pierre P Massion; Matthew Niederst; Martin Peifer; Jun Yokota; Ramaswamy Govindan; John T Poirier; Lauren A Byers; Murry W Wynes; David G McFadden; David MacPherson; Christine L Hann; Anna F Farago; Caroline Dive; Beverly A Teicher; Craig D Peacock; Jane E Johnson; Melanie H Cobb; Hans-Guido Wendel; David Spigel; Julien Sage; Ping Yang; M Catherine Pietanza; Lee M Krug; John Heymach; Peter Ujhazy; Caicun Zhou; Koichi Goto; Afshin Dowlati; Camilla Laulund Christensen; Keunchil Park; Lawrence H Einhorn; Martin J Edelman; Giuseppe Giaccone; David E Gerber; Ravi Salgia; Taofeek Owonikoko; Shakun Malik; Niki Karachaliou; David R Gandara; Ben J Slotman; Fiona Blackhall; Glenwood Goss; Roman Thomas; Charles M Rudin; Fred R Hirsch Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2016-01-30 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Gurkan Mollaoglu; Matthew R Guthrie; Stefanie Böhm; Johannes Brägelmann; Ismail Can; Paul M Ballieu; Annika Marx; Julie George; Christine Heinen; Milind D Chalishazar; Haixia Cheng; Abbie S Ireland; Kendall E Denning; Anandaroop Mukhopadhyay; Jeffery M Vahrenkamp; Kristofer C Berrett; Timothy L Mosbruger; Jun Wang; Jessica L Kohan; Mohamed E Salama; Benjamin L Witt; Martin Peifer; Roman K Thomas; Jason Gertz; Jane E Johnson; Adi F Gazdar; Robert J Wechsler-Reya; Martin L Sos; Trudy G Oliver Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Johannes Brägelmann; Stefanie Böhm; Matthew R Guthrie; Gurkan Mollaoglu; Trudy G Oliver; Martin L Sos Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2017-07-24 Impact factor: 4.534
Authors: Nagako Akeno; Alisa L Reece; Melissa Callahan; Ashley L Miller; Rebecca G Kim; Diana He; Adam Lane; Jonathan S Moulton; Kathryn A Wikenheiser-Brokamp Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2017-08-28 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Joshua K Sabari; Benjamin H Lok; James H Laird; John T Poirier; Charles M Rudin Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2017-05-23 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Mark D Borromeo; Trisha K Savage; Rahul K Kollipara; Min He; Alexander Augustyn; Jihan K Osborne; Luc Girard; John D Minna; Adi F Gazdar; Melanie H Cobb; Jane E Johnson Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 9.423