Literature DB >> 25673740

Sensory-evoked perturbations of locomotor activity by sparse sensory input: a computational study.

Tuan V Bui1, Robert M Brownstone2.   

Abstract

Sensory inputs from muscle, cutaneous, and joint afferents project to the spinal cord, where they are able to affect ongoing locomotor activity. Activation of sensory input can initiate or prolong bouts of locomotor activity depending on the identity of the sensory afferent activated and the timing of the activation within the locomotor cycle. However, the mechanisms by which afferent activity modifies locomotor rhythm and the distribution of sensory afferents to the spinal locomotor networks have not been determined. Considering the many sources of sensory inputs to the spinal cord, determining this distribution would provide insights into how sensory inputs are integrated to adjust ongoing locomotor activity. We asked whether a sparsely distributed set of sensory inputs could modify ongoing locomotor activity. To address this question, several computational models of locomotor central pattern generators (CPGs) that were mechanistically diverse and generated locomotor-like rhythmic activity were developed. We show that sensory inputs restricted to a small subset of the network neurons can perturb locomotor activity in the same manner as seen experimentally. Furthermore, we show that an architecture with sparse sensory input improves the capacity to gate sensory information by selectively modulating sensory channels. These data demonstrate that sensory input to rhythm-generating networks need not be extensively distributed.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Keywords:  central pattern generators; locomotion; sensory inputs; sparse coding; spinal cord

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25673740      PMCID: PMC4416624          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00866.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  86 in total

1.  Sparse and dense coding of natural stimuli by distinct midbrain neuron subpopulations in weakly electric fish.

Authors:  Katrin Vonderschen; Maurice J Chacron
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Serotonin 5-HT2 receptors induce a long-lasting facilitation of spinal reflexes independent of ionotropic receptor activity.

Authors:  Barbara L Shay; Michael Sawchuk; David W Machacek; Shawn Hochman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Biological pattern generation: the cellular and computational logic of networks in motion.

Authors:  Sten Grillner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Excitatory and inhibitory skin areas for flexor and extensor motoneurons.

Authors:  K E HAGBARTH
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand Suppl       Date:  1952

Review 5.  New moves in motor control.

Authors:  Ansgar Büschges; Henrike Scholz; Abdeljabbar El Manira
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Phasic gain control of reflexes from the dorsum of the paw during spinal locomotion.

Authors:  H Forssberg; S Grillner; S Rossignol
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1977-08-19       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Ankle extensor group I afferents excite extensors throughout the hindlimb during fictive locomotion in the cat.

Authors:  P Guertin; M J Angel; M C Perreault; D A McCrea
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1995-08-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 8.  The computational role of dopamine D1 receptors in working memory.

Authors:  Daniel Durstewitz; Jeremy K Seamans
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2002 Jun-Jul

9.  Heterogeneous electrotonic coupling and synchronization of rhythmic bursting activity in mouse Hb9 interneurons.

Authors:  J M Wilson; A I Cowan; R M Brownstone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Persistent sodium currents participate in fictive locomotion generation in neonatal mouse spinal cord.

Authors:  Guisheng Zhong; Mark A Masino; Ronald M Harris-Warrick
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Genetically identified spinal interneurons integrating tactile afferents for motor control.

Authors:  Tuan V Bui; Nicolas Stifani; Izabela Panek; Carl Farah
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  And yet it moves: Recovery of volitional control after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  G Taccola; D Sayenko; P Gad; Y Gerasimenko; V R Edgerton
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 3.  Spinal Interneurons as Gatekeepers to Neuroplasticity after Injury or Disease.

Authors:  Lyandysha V Zholudeva; Victoria E Abraira; Kajana Satkunendrarajah; Todd C McDevitt; Martyn D Goulding; David S K Magnuson; Michael A Lane
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 6.709

Review 4.  Computational Modeling of Spinal Locomotor Circuitry in the Age of Molecular Genetics.

Authors:  Jessica Ausborn; Natalia A Shevtsova; Simon M Danner
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Unusual Quadrupedal Locomotion in Rat during Recovery from Lumbar Spinal Blockade of 5-HT7 Receptors.

Authors:  Urszula Sławińska; Henryk Majczyński; Anna Kwaśniewska; Krzysztof Miazga; Anna M Cabaj; Marek Bekisz; Larry M Jordan; Małgorzata Zawadzka
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.