Literature DB >> 25672423

Relationship between retinal sensitivity and disease activity in patients with psoriasis vulgaris.

Helin Deniz Demir1, Göknur Kalkan2, Semiha Kurt3, Alper Güneş1, Engin Sezer4, Ünal Erkorkmaz5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Psoriasis is a hyperproliferative chronic inflammatory skin disease of unknown etiology and ocular structures and visual pathways can also be affected during the course of this disease. Subclinical optic neuritis has previously been observed in psoriatic patients in visual evoked potential studies. This trial was designed to evaluate retinal sensitivity in patients with psoriasis vulgaris.
METHODS: A total of 40 eyes of 40 patients with chronic plaque-type psoriasis and 40 eyes of 40 age- and sex-matched control subjects were included in this study. The diagnosis of psoriasis was confirmed by skin biopsy. The severity was determined using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and the duration of the disease was recorded. After a full ophthalmological examination, including tests for color vision and pupil reactions, the visual field of each subject was assessed using both standard achromatic perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry.
RESULTS: The mean Psoriasis Area and Severity Index was 22.05±6.40'. There were no significant differences in the visual field parameters of subjects versus controls using either method. There were correlations between disease severity and the mean deviations in standard achromatic perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry and between disease severity and the corrected pattern standard deviation and pattern standard deviation of short wavelength automated perimetry (r = -0.363, r = -0.399, r = 0.515 and r = 0.369, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Retinal sensitivity appears to be affected by the severity of psoriasis vulgaris.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25672423      PMCID: PMC4311121          DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2015(01)03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)        ISSN: 1807-5932            Impact factor:   2.365


INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a hyperproliferative chronic inflammatory skin disease of unknown etiology. It is characterized by red and scaly plaques caused by epidermal hyperproliferation. It has a complex pathogenesis including immune system alterations and systemic and/or local factors. Psychological stress, focal infections and some drugs as well as the activation of leucocytes, which control cellular immunity and T cell-dependent inflammatory processes, cause the growth of epidermal and vascular cells in psoriatic skin lesions 1-6. Ocular structures and visual pathways can also be affected in patients suffering from psoriasis 4,7. Subclinical optic neuritis has previously been shown in psoriatic patients in visual evoked potential studies. Elongation of P100 latency and a reduction in the response amplitude, which designate myelin and axonal involvement of the optic nerve, have also been observed 8,9. Electroretinography responses revealed impairment in overall retinal electrophysiologic functions 10. Visual field assessment is a functional measurement method that documents central and peripheral sensitivity of the retina in both pathological and normal situations 11. Standard achromatic perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) use white and blue light stimuli, respectively, of different sizes and intensities to evaluate the retinal sensitivity and SWAP was found to be more sensitive for detecting early visual field changes. In light of these findings, the objective of this study was to examine the visual field in psoriatic patients without any pathology of the retina and/or optic nerve with the aim of evaluating retinal sensitivity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 40 eyes of 40 patients with newly diagnosed plaque-type psoriasis and 40 eyes of 40 age- and sex-matched control subjects were included in the study. The diagnosis of psoriasis was based on both histopathological and clinical findings. The severity was determined using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and the duration of the disease recorded. Possible reasons for exclusion included the following: a history of neurological diseases, space-occupying lesions, optic neuropathy, high refractive errors, glaucoma, retinal pathology, color vision defects and cataracts, the use of systemic and/or topical retinoic acid or immunosuppressive medication, and undergoing ultraviolet therapy. Each patient underwent a full ophthalmological examination, including measurement of pupil reactions and application of the Ishihara test for color vision. All visual field tests were performed using the central 30-2 threshold strategy with a Humphrey Field Analyzer (750i; Humphrey Instruments, San Leandro, California, USA) with SAP (using a Goldmann size III stimulus) and SWAP (using a Goldmann size V stimulus). Each test was performed by the same technician and the patients were instructed to rest before the examination of the other eye. For each subject, only one eye with reliable visual field parameters (fixation loss of less than 20%, false positive rate of less than 33%, false negative rate of less than 33%) was included in the study. Global indices (mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), short-term fluctuation (SF) and corrected pattern standard deviation (CPSD)) were evaluated. This study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and patients provided their informed consent after the nature and purpose of the study were fully explained to them. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to evaluate whether the variables were normally distributed. A two-tailed independent samples t test was used to compare the ophthalmologic parameters between the experimental and control groups. A paired sample t-test was used to compare the ophthalmologic parameters between the SAP and SWAP methods (separately for each group). A repeated measures two-way ANOVA was used to analyze differences in the methods between the experimental and control groups. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to determine the significance of the association between two random variables. Continuous variables are presented as the mean±standard deviation. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test and presented as numerical variables and percentages. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Analyses were performed using commercial software (IBM SPSS Statistics 19; SPSS Inc., an IBM Co., Somers, NY, USA).

RESULTS

Demographic data are summarized in Table 1. There were no statistically significant intergroup differences in the age or gender of the patients. None of the study patients has systemic signs of psoriasis. The ophthalmologic examinations, including color vision tests and pupil reactions, revealed unremarkable results in both groups. The best corrected visual acuity was 20/20 in both study groups and none of the study subjects presented with retinal and/or optic nerve pathology or ocular pathology. The visual field parameters are summarized in Table 2. No significant differences were observed between the two groups; however, correlations were noted between disease severity (PASI) and the mean deviations of SAP and SWAP and between PASI and the CPSD and PSD of SWAP (r = -0.363, r = -0.399, r = 0.515, and r = 0.369, respectively) (Table 3).
Table 1

Demographic data of patients in the experimental and control groups.

Control (n = 40)Experimental (n = 40)p-value
GenderFemale22 (55.0)25 (62.5)0.650
Male18 (45.0)15 (37.5)
Age40.60±11.1739.03±14.840.593
Disease duration (years)-8.13±7.39-
PASI-22.05±6.40-

The data are presented as n (%) or as the mean±standard deviation.

PASI: Psoriasis Activity and Severity Index.

Table 2

Visual parameters of patients in the experimental and control groups obtained via standard achromatic perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry.

Control (n = 40)Experimental (n = 40)p-value
MDSAP-3.30±2.12-3.73±2.190.376
SWAP-7.75±4.17-7.80±3.400.953
PSDSAP3.21±1.343.23±1.660.953
SWAP3.55±0.973.48±0.970.749
CPSDSAP2.23±1.622.42±1.850.633
SWAP2.00±1.442.32±1.320.313
SFSAP1.97±0.711.70±0.660.075
SWAP2.33±0.722.05±0.720.092

The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.

SAP: standard achromatic perimetry; SWAP: short wavelength automated perimetry; MD: mean deviation; PSD: pattern standard deviation; SF: short-term fluctuation; CPSD: corrected pattern standard deviation.

Table 3

Correlation between visual field parameters and the psoriasis activity and severity index (PASI).

PASI
MDSAP-0.363*
SWAP-0.399*
PSDSAP0.280
SWAP0.515**
CPSDSAP0.274
SWAP0.369*
SFSAP0.101
SWAP0.269

*:

SAP: standard achromatic perimetry; SWAP: short wavelength automated perimetry; MD: mean deviation; PSD: pattern standard deviation; SF: short-term fluctuation; CPSD: corrected pattern standard deviation.

DISCUSSION

Psoriasis is an organ-specific autoimmune disease that is characterized by exacerbation and remission 1,4. Psoriasis activity increases with psychological stress, which has been explained by the common origin of keratinocytes and nervous cells during embryogenesis 3,8,9. Any part of the eye may be affected by psoriasis: the eyelids, conjunctiva, cornea, uvea, retina, optic nerve and lens may be involved in the disease process. Ocular symptoms are reported to occur during exacerbation of the disease 4,7. The current gold standard for the assessment of psoriasis severity is PASI, which evaluates the redness, thickness and scaliness of the lesions. PASI is a scoring system that takes into account the localization, extent and severity of the skin signs and provides a single score for psoriasis severity ranging from 0 to 72 12-14. Abnormalities in the visual field may be observed in patients with normal central vision. In recent years, the sensitivity of SWAP was compared to that of SAP. SWAP was found to be more sensitive for detecting early glaucomatous and neuro-ophthalmologic visual field changes and was able to reveal functional abnormalities in the retina and optic nerve in patients with normal ocular structures 15-18. To the best of our knowledge, the visual field has not yet been studied in psoriasis patients. We evaluated the visual field of the study group using both SAP and SWAP and we did not detect any statistically significant difference between patients and controls; however, we found a correlation between the visual field parameters and PASI. Our study group consisted of patients with moderate psoriasis, which might explain the statistically insignificant intergroup difference in the visual field parameters. When we examined the correlation between visual field parameters and disease activity and severity, we found a negative correlation between the MD of both visual field analyses and PASI. Retinal sensitivity appears to decrease when psoriasis is exacerbated. We also found that the CPSD and PSD of SWAP were positively correlated with PASI, which may indicate localized defects in the visual field during exacerbation periods. SWAP appears to be more sensitive for detecting early functional changes in severe and active psoriasis. Psoriasis is known as a skin disease and it has been shown to have a complex pathophysiology and a strong relationship with proinflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and interleukins 6 and 8 (IL-6 and IL-8). Although one of the limitations of the current study is the lack of data regarding plasma proinflammatory cytokine levels of the study subjects, the role of cytokines has been extensively studied in patients with psoriasis. Serum TNF-α and IFN-γ levels were significantly higher in patients with active psoriasis and these high serum levels were positively correlated with the clinical severity and activity of the disease 19,20. The serum levels of these cytokines were reported to serve as a follow-up marker for monitoring disease severity 19,20. Overexpression of TNF-α has been demonstrated in the plasma and skin lesions of psoriatic patients 1,5,6,19,20 and anti-TNF-α therapy has gained popularity in recent years 1,6. TNF-α, an immunomediator and proinflammatory cytokine, is a potent neurotoxic substance that induces apoptotic cell death 21-25. IFN-γ plays an important role in autoimmune and infectious diseases 26. Animal studies have shown that IFN-γ induces apoptosis in the retinal ganglion cell layer, resulting in photoreceptor loss and disturbance of the axonal transport system of the affected neurons 26,27. In addition, IL-8 induced cell death in cultured neurons, while IL-6 stimulated oxidative stress 28-31. The neurotoxic effects of these proinflammatory cytokines have been implicated in the pathogenesis of several central nervous system diseases, retinal ganglion cell damage and optic nerve crush 21,22,28. The inflammatory response and likely the increased plasma levels of circulating proinflammatory cytokines, in active and severe psoriasis seem to affect retinal functions and decrease retinal sensitivity. Although the main target of psoriasis is the skin, based on the results of the current study, patients with psoriasis should undergo regular ophthalmological examinations to examine their retinal functions and identify potential ocular involvement. Additional studies with a larger number of participants should be performed to evaluate the retinal involvement and roles of these cytokines in psoriatic patients.
  28 in total

Review 1.  Retinal ganglion cell disorders: types and treatments.

Authors:  Leonard A Levin; Lynn K Gordon
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 21.198

2.  Use of blue-on-yellow perimetry for detection of sectoranopia.

Authors:  N Fujimoto; M Kubota; N Saeki; E Adachi-Usami
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  TNF-alpha and TNF-alpha receptor-1 in the retina of normal and glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  G Tezel; L Y Li; R V Patil; M B Wax
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Multiplex cytokine analysis reveals elevated concentration of interleukin-8 in glaucomatous aqueous humor.

Authors:  John Kuchtey; Kasra A Rezaei; Pimkwan Jaru-Ampornpan; Paul Sternberg; Rachel W Kuchtey
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 5.  Short wavelength automated perimetry.

Authors:  J M Wild
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2001-12

Review 6.  Ocular psoriasis.

Authors:  Balvinder Rehal; Bobeck S Modjtahedi; Lawrence S Morse; Ivan R Schwab; Howard I Maibach
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 11.527

7.  Dry eye and tear film functions in patients with psoriasis.

Authors:  Young Her; Ji Won Lim; Sang Hak Han
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Concordance of the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and patient-reported outcomes in psoriasis treatment.

Authors:  Ines Schäfer; Jana Hacker; Stephan Jeff Rustenbach; Marc Radtke; Nadine Franzke; Matthias Augustin
Journal:  Eur J Dermatol       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 3.328

Review 9.  Advancements in the treatment of psoriasis: role of biologic agents.

Authors:  Sheldon J Rich; Christina E Bello-Quintero
Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

Review 10.  Brodalumab: an evidence-based review of its potential in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Authors:  Susana Coimbra; Américo Figueiredo; Alice Santos-Silva
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2014-07-21
View more
  1 in total

1.  A Multimodal Eye Assessment in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients sine-Psoriasis: Evidence for a Potential Association with Systemic Inflammation.

Authors:  Maria Sole Chimenti; Paola Triggianese; Giorgia Salandri; Paola Conigliaro; Claudia Canofari; Francesco Caso; Luisa Costa; Carlo Nucci; Francesco Aiello; Massimo Cesareo; Roberto Perricone
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 4.241

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.