| Literature DB >> 25671200 |
Jinkyung Cho1, Inhwan Lee1, Donghyun Kim1, Yeojung Koh1, Jiyoung Kong1, Sanghee Lee1, Hyunsik Kang1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of aerobic exercise training on a high fat diet (HFD)-induced fatty liver and its metabolic complications in C57BL/6 mice.Entities:
Keywords: AMPK; aerobic exercise; high-fat diet; insulin resistance; non-alcoholic fatty liver
Year: 2014 PMID: 25671200 PMCID: PMC4322024 DOI: 10.5717/jenb.2014.18.4.339
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exerc Nutrition Biochem ISSN: 2233-6834
Mouse Taqman probes
| Gene symbol | Assay ID |
|---|---|
| Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) | Mm00440939_m1 |
| NAD-dependent protein deacetylase sirtuin-1 (SIRT1) | Mm00490758_m1 |
| Carnitine palmitoyltransferase I (CPT1A) | Mm01231183_m1 |
| Fatty acid synthase (FAS) | Mm01204974_m 1 |
| Sterol regulatory element-binding transcription factor 1c (SREBP1c) | Mm00550338_m1 |
| Lipin1 | Mm00550511_m1 |
| Beta-actin (β-actin) | Mm00607939_s 1 |
Metabolic characteristics
| SC + CON ( | HFD + CON ( | HFD + EX ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 29.7 ± 2.5a | 47.9 ± 1.0b | 44.7 ± 1.9c |
| Food intake (g/week/mouse) | 17.7 ± 0.9a | 13.1 ± 1.1b | 12.7 ± 1.4b |
| Fasting glucose (mg/dL) | 74.2 ± 9.1a | 145.4 ± 11.6b | 135.4 ± 4.5c |
| Fasting insulin (μU/dL) | 0.09 ± 0.05a | 0.39 ± 0.09b | 0.28 ± 0.05c |
| Serum TG (mg/dL) | 73.2 ± 9.0 | 71.4 ± 9.2 | 73.7 ± 10.0 |
| Serum cholesterol (mg/dL) | 76.6 ± 7.4a | 245.8 ± 48.7b | 198.7 ± 20.0c |
| Liver TG (mg/mg liver tissue) | 24.7 ± 2.4a | 60.1 ± 5.9b | 46.8 ± 6.0c |
TG: triglycerides. Data are presented as means ± SD. Superscripts with different letters (i.e., a-b, b-c) indicate significant group differences.
Multiple comparison used LSD.
Fig. 1.Effects of aerobic exercise training on metabolic parameters (A) Glucose homeostasis was assessed by an intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT) and (B) intraperitoneal insulin tolerance test (IPITT). (C) The area under the curves for GTT and (D) ITT were calculated. Data are presented as means ± SD. Superscripts with different letters (i.e., a-b, b-c) indicate significant group differences. LSD post hoc tests were used for multiple comparisons.
Fig. 2.Effects of aerobic exercise training on hepatic steatosis (A) Representative images of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Quantification of liver TG and ALT levels is shown in B and C. Data are presented as means ± SD. Superscripts with different letters (i.e., ab, b-c) indicate significant group differences. LSD post hoc tests were used for multiple comparisons.
Fig. 3.Effects of aerobic exercise training on markers of hepatic lipogenesis (A) Taqman real-time PCR data represent levels of CPT1a and PPARα related to fatty acid oxidation and (B) SREBP1c, lipin1, and FAS including TG synthesis. (C, D) Liver protein was immunoblotted for pAMPK, total AMPK, pACC, and SIRT1. Data were normalized to βactin levels. Data are presented as means ± SD. Superscripts with different letters (i.e., a-b, b-c) indicate significant group differences. LSD post hoc tests were used for multiple comparisons.