Literature DB >> 25670021

Differences in indoor versus outdoor concentrations of ultrafine particles, PM2.5, PMabsorbance and NO2 in Swiss homes.

Reto Meier1, Marloes Eeftens1, Harish C Phuleria2, Alex Ineichen1, Elisabetta Corradi1, Mark Davey1, Martin Fierz3, Regina E Ducret-Stich1, Inmaculada Aguilera1, Christian Schindler1, Thierry Rochat4, Nicole Probst-Hensch1, Ming-Yi Tsai1, Nino Künzli1.   

Abstract

Indoor air quality is a growing concern as we spend the majority of time indoors and as new buildings are increasingly airtight for energy saving purposes. For a better understanding of residential indoor air pollution in Switzerland we conducted repeated 1-2-week-long indoor and outdoor measurements of particle number concentrations (PNC), particulate matter (PM), light absorbance of PM2.5 (PMabsorbance) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Residents of all homes were enrolled in the Swiss Cohort Study on Air Pollution and Lung and Heart Diseases in Adults (SAPALDIA). Indoor levels were comparable in urban areas and generally low in rural homes. Average indoor levels were 7800 particles/cm(3) (interquartile range=7200); 8.7 μg/m(3) (6.5) PM2.5 and 10.2 μg/m(3) (11.2) NO2. All pollutants showed large variability of indoor/outdoor ratios between sites. We observed similar diurnal patterns for indoor and outdoor PNC. Nevertheless, the correlation of average indoor and outdoor PNC between sites as well as longitudinal indoor/outdoor correlations within sites were low. Our results show that a careful evaluation of home characteristics is needed when estimating indoor exposure to pollutants with outdoor origin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25670021     DOI: 10.1038/jes.2015.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1559-0631            Impact factor:   5.563


  9 in total

1.  Comparison between different traffic-related particle indicators: elemental carbon (EC), PM2.5 mass, and absorbance.

Authors:  Josef Cyrys; Joachim Heinrich; Gerard Hoek; Kees Meliefste; Marie Lewné; Ulrike Gehring; Tom Bellander; Paul Fischer; Patricia van Vliet; Michael Brauer; H-Erich Wichmann; Bert Brunekreef
Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2003-03

2.  A cost-effective weighing chamber for particulate matter filters.

Authors:  R Allen; M Box; L J Liu; T V Larson
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.235

3.  Indoor and outdoor concentrations of ultrafine particles in some Scandinavian rural and urban areas.

Authors:  Uve Matson
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2004-11-14       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Indoor time-microenvironment-activity patterns in seven regions of Europe.

Authors:  Christian Schweizer; Rufus David Edwards; Lucy Bayer-Oglesby; William James Gauderman; Vito Ilacqua; Matti Juhani Jantunen; Hak Kan Lai; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen; Nino Künzli
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 5.563

5.  Ultrafine particles: exposure and source apportionment in 56 Danish homes.

Authors:  Gabriel Bekö; Charles J Weschler; Aneta Wierzbicka; Dorina Gabriela Karottki; Jørn Toftum; Steffen Loft; Geo Clausen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Comparison of black smoke and PM2.5 levels in indoor and outdoor environments of four European cities.

Authors:  Thomas Gotschi; Lucy Oglesby; Patrick Mathys; Christian Monn; Nikos Manalis; Kimmo Koistinen; Matti Jantunen; Otto Hanninen; Liba Polanska; Nino Kunzli
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Agreement of land use regression models with personal exposure measurements of particulate matter and nitrogen oxides air pollution.

Authors:  Denise Montagne; Gerard Hoek; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen; Timo Lanki; Arto Pennanen; Meritxell Portella; Kees Meliefste; Marloes Eeftens; Tarja Yli-Tuomi; Marta Cirach; Bert Brunekreef
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 8.  Black carbon as an additional indicator of the adverse health effects of airborne particles compared with PM10 and PM2.5.

Authors:  Nicole A H Janssen; Gerard Hoek; Milena Simic-Lawson; Paul Fischer; Leendert van Bree; Harry ten Brink; Menno Keuken; Richard W Atkinson; H Ross Anderson; Bert Brunekreef; Flemming R Cassee
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Translocation and potential neurological effects of fine and ultrafine particles a critical update.

Authors:  Annette Peters; Bellina Veronesi; Lilian Calderón-Garcidueñas; Peter Gehr; Lung Chi Chen; Marianne Geiser; William Reed; Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser; Samuel Schürch; Holger Schulz
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 9.400

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Inequalities in Exposure to Nitrogen Dioxide in Parks and Playgrounds in Greater London.

Authors:  Charlotte E Sheridan; Charlotte J Roscoe; John Gulliver; Laure de Preux; Daniela Fecht
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Continuous measurement of reactive oxygen species inside and outside of a residential house during summer.

Authors:  Azin Eftekhari; Claire F Fortenberry; Brent J Williams; Michael J Walker; Audrey Dang; Annalise Pfaff; Nuran Ercal; Glenn C Morrison
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 6.554

Review 3.  A systematic literature review on indoor PM2.5 concentrations and personal exposure in urban residential buildings.

Authors:  Yu Liu; Hongqiang Ma; Na Zhang; Qinghua Li
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-08-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.