Literature DB >> 23786264

Agreement of land use regression models with personal exposure measurements of particulate matter and nitrogen oxides air pollution.

Denise Montagne1, Gerard Hoek, Mark Nieuwenhuijsen, Timo Lanki, Arto Pennanen, Meritxell Portella, Kees Meliefste, Marloes Eeftens, Tarja Yli-Tuomi, Marta Cirach, Bert Brunekreef.   

Abstract

Land use regression (LUR) models are often used to predict long-term average concentrations of air pollutants. Little is known how well LUR models predict personal exposure. In this study, the agreement of LUR models with measured personal exposure was assessed. The measured components were particulate matter with a diameter smaller than 2.5 μm (PM2.5), soot (reflectance of PM2.5), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). In Helsinki, Utrecht, and Barcelona, 15 volunteers (from semiurban, urban background, and traffic sites) followed prescribed time activity patterns. Per participant, six 96 h outdoor, indoor, and personal measurements spread over three seasons were conducted. Soot LUR models were significantly correlated with measured average outdoor and personal soot concentrations. Soot LUR models explained 39%, 44%, and 20% of personal exposure variability (R(2)) in Helsinki, Utrecht, and Barcelona. NO2 LUR models significantly predicted outdoor concentrations and personal exposure in Utrecht and Helsinki, whereas NOx and PM2.5 LUR models did not predict personal exposure. PM2.5, NO2, and NOx models were correlated with personal soot, the component least affected by indoor sources. LUR modeled and measured outdoor, indoor, and personal concentrations were highly correlated for all pollutants when data from the three cities were combined. This study supports the use of intraurban LUR models for especially soot in air pollution epidemiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23786264     DOI: 10.1021/es400920a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  8 in total

1.  Does air pollution trigger suicide? A case-crossover analysis of suicide deaths over the life span.

Authors:  Lidia Casas; Bianca Cox; Mariska Bauwelinck; Benoit Nemery; Patrick Deboosere; Tim Steve Nawrot
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Differences in indoor versus outdoor concentrations of ultrafine particles, PM2.5, PMabsorbance and NO2 in Swiss homes.

Authors:  Reto Meier; Marloes Eeftens; Harish C Phuleria; Alex Ineichen; Elisabetta Corradi; Mark Davey; Martin Fierz; Regina E Ducret-Stich; Inmaculada Aguilera; Christian Schindler; Thierry Rochat; Nicole Probst-Hensch; Ming-Yi Tsai; Nino Künzli
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 5.563

3.  Socioeconomic position and low birth weight among mothers exposed to traffic-related air pollution.

Authors:  Mateus Habermann; Nelson Gouveia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Assessing the Impact of Land-Use Planning on the Atmospheric Environment through Predicting the Spatial Variability of Airborne Pollutants.

Authors:  Longgao Chen; Long Li; Xiaoyan Yang; Yu Zhang; Longqian Chen; Xiaodong Ma
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Representativeness of an air quality monitoring station for PM2.5 and source apportionment over a small urban domain.

Authors:  S Yatkin; M Gerboles; C A Belis; F Karagulian; F Lagler; M Barbiere; A Borowiak
Journal:  Atmos Pollut Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.352

6.  Comparison of measured residential black carbon levels outdoors and indoors with fixed-site monitoring data and with dispersion modelling.

Authors:  Olena Gruzieva; Antonios Georgelis; Niklas Andersson; Tom Bellander; Christer Johansson; Anne-Sophie Merritt
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 7.  Spatial and Temporal Dynamics in Air Pollution Exposure Assessment.

Authors:  Daniela Dias; Oxana Tchepel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Personal exposure levels to O3, NOx and PM10 and the association to ambient levels in two Swedish cities.

Authors:  Susanna Lohman Haga; Annika Hagenbjörk; Anna-Carin Olin; Bertil Forsberg; Ingrid Liljelind; Hanne Krage Carlsen; Lars Modig
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 2.513

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.