Literature DB >> 25669144

Finding our way: On the sharing and reuse of animal telemetry data in Australasia.

Hamish A Campbell1, Hawthorne L Beyer2, Todd E Dennis3, Ross G Dwyer4, James D Forester5, Yusuke Fukuda6, Catherine Lynch7, Mark A Hindell8, Norbert Menke9, Juan M Morales10, Craig Richardson11, Essie Rodgers4, Graeme Taylor12, Matt E Watts2, David A Westcott13.   

Abstract

The presence and movements of organisms both reflect and influence the distribution of ecological resources in space and time. The monitoring of animal movement by telemetry devices is being increasingly used to inform management of marine, freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems. Here, we brought together academics, and environmental managers to determine the extent of animal movement research in the Australasian region, and assess the opportunities and challenges in the sharing and reuse of these data. This working group was formed under the Australian Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (ACEAS), whose overall aim was to facilitate trans-organisational and transdisciplinary synthesis. We discovered that between 2000 and 2012 at least 501 peer-reviewed scientific papers were published that report animal location data collected by telemetry devices from within the Australasian region. Collectively, this involved the capture and electronic tagging of 12 656 animals. The majority of studies were undertaken to address specific management questions; rarely were these data used beyond their original intent. We estimate that approximately half (~500) of all animal telemetry projects undertaken remained unpublished, a similar proportion were not discoverable via online resources, and less than 8.8% of all animals tagged and tracked had their data stored in a discoverable and accessible manner. Animal telemetry data contain a wealth of information about how animals and species interact with each other and the landscapes they inhabit. These data are expensive and difficult to collect and can reduce survivorship of the tagged individuals, which implies an ethical obligation to make the data available to the scientific community. This is the first study to quantify the gap between telemetry devices placed on animals and findings/data published, and presents methods for improvement. Instigation of these strategies will enhance the cost-effectiveness of the research and maximise its impact on the management of natural resources.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  ARGOS; Biotelemetry; GPS; Inter-disciplinary; Movement ecology; Wildlife tracking

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25669144     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  6 in total

Review 1.  Quantifying research waste in ecology.

Authors:  Marija Purgar; Tin Klanjscek; Antica Culina
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 19.100

2.  A story of data won, data lost and data re-found: the realities of ecological data preservation.

Authors:  Alison Specht; Matthew P Bolton; Bryn Kingsford; Raymond L Specht; Lee Belbin
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2018-11-07

3.  Right on track? Performance of satellite telemetry in terrestrial wildlife research.

Authors:  M P G Hofman; M W Hayward; M Heim; P Marchand; C M Rolandsen; J Mattisson; F Urbano; M Heurich; A Mysterud; J Melzheimer; N Morellet; U Voigt; B L Allen; B Gehr; C Rouco; W Ullmann; Ø Holand; N H Jørgensen; G Steinheim; F Cagnacci; M Kroeschel; P Kaczensky; B Buuveibaatar; J C Payne; I Palmegiani; K Jerina; P Kjellander; Ö Johansson; S LaPoint; R Bayrakcismith; J D C Linnell; M Zaccaroni; M L S Jorge; J E F Oshima; A Songhurst; C Fischer; R T Mc Bride; J J Thompson; S Streif; R Sandfort; C Bonenfant; M Drouilly; M Klapproth; D Zinner; R Yarnell; A Stronza; L Wilmott; E Meisingset; M Thaker; A T Vanak; S Nicoloso; R Graeber; S Said; M R Boudreau; A Devlin; R Hoogesteijn; J A May-Junior; J C Nifong; J Odden; H B Quigley; F Tortato; D M Parker; A Caso; J Perrine; C Tellaeche; F Zieba; T Zwijacz-Kozica; C L Appel; I Axsom; W T Bean; B Cristescu; S Périquet; K J Teichman; S Karpanty; A Licoppe; V Menges; K Black; T L Scheppers; S C Schai-Braun; F C Azevedo; F G Lemos; A Payne; L H Swanepoel; B V Weckworth; A Berger; A Bertassoni; G McCulloch; P Šustr; V Athreya; D Bockmuhl; J Casaer; A Ekori; D Melovski; C Richard-Hansen; D van de Vyver; R Reyna-Hurtado; E Robardet; N Selva; A Sergiel; M S Farhadinia; P Sunde; R Portas; H Ambarli; R Berzins; P M Kappeler; G K Mann; L Pyritz; C Bissett; T Grant; R Steinmetz; L Swedell; R J Welch; D Armenteras; O R Bidder; T M González; A Rosenblatt; S Kachel; N Balkenhol
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Global political responsibility for the conservation of albatrosses and large petrels.

Authors:  Martin Beal; Maria P Dias; Richard A Phillips; Steffen Oppel; Carolina Hazin; Elizabeth J Pearmain; Josh Adams; David J Anderson; Michelle Antolos; Javier A Arata; José Manuel Arcos; John P Y Arnould; Jill Awkerman; Elizabeth Bell; Mike Bell; Mark Carey; Ryan Carle; Thomas A Clay; Jaimie Cleeland; Valentina Colodro; Melinda Conners; Marta Cruz-Flores; Richard Cuthbert; Karine Delord; Lorna Deppe; Ben J Dilley; Herculano Dinis; Graeme Elliott; Fernanda De Felipe; Jonathan Felis; Manuela G Forero; Amanda Freeman; Akira Fukuda; Jacob González-Solís; José Pedro Granadeiro; April Hedd; Peter Hodum; José Manuel Igual; Audrey Jaeger; Todd J Landers; Matthieu Le Corre; Azwianewi Makhado; Benjamin Metzger; Teresa Militão; William A Montevecchi; Virginia Morera-Pujol; Leia Navarro-Herrero; Deon Nel; David Nicholls; Daniel Oro; Ridha Ouni; Kiyoaki Ozaki; Flavio Quintana; Raül Ramos; Tim Reid; José Manuel Reyes-González; Christopher Robertson; Graham Robertson; Mohamed Salah Romdhane; Peter G Ryan; Paul Sagar; Fumio Sato; Stefan Schoombie; R Paul Scofield; Scott A Shaffer; Nirmal Jivan Shah; Kim L Stevens; Christopher Surman; Robert M Suryan; Akinori Takahashi; Vikash Tatayah; Graeme Taylor; David R Thompson; Leigh Torres; Kath Walker; Ross Wanless; Susan M Waugh; Henri Weimerskirch; Takashi Yamamoto; Zuzana Zajkova; Laura Zango; Paulo Catry
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 14.136

5.  Australia's continental-scale acoustic tracking database and its automated quality control process.

Authors:  Xavier Hoenner; Charlie Huveneers; Andre Steckenreuter; Colin Simpfendorfer; Katherine Tattersall; Fabrice Jaine; Natalia Atkins; Russ Babcock; Stephanie Brodie; Jonathan Burgess; Hamish Campbell; Michelle Heupel; Benedicte Pasquer; Roger Proctor; Matthew D Taylor; Vinay Udyawer; Robert Harcourt
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 6.444

6.  Motivations and fears driving participation in collaborative research infrastructure for animal tracking.

Authors:  Tara L Crewe; Dave Kendal; Hamish A Campbell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.