Literature DB >> 2566735

Randomised, controlled trial of faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer. Results for first 107,349 subjects.

J D Hardcastle1, W M Thomas, J Chamberlain, G Pye, J Sheffield, P D James, T W Balfour, S S Amar, N C Armitage, S M Moss.   

Abstract

To assess the effectiveness of screening by faecal occult blood tests, 107,349 people without symptoms of colorectal disease identified from general practitioner records have been randomly allocated to test and control groups. 53,464 test subjects were invited to carry out the screening test; 27,651 (53%) of the 52,258 who received the tests did so. Further investigation of the 618 (2.3%) with positive tests showed 63 cancers (52% stage A) and 367 adenomas (266 subjects). Rescreening of subjects with negative results every 2 years (9510 first rescreen, 3639 second) has shown a significant fall in the rate of positive results (1.7% of 7344; 0.3% of 2906). Cancers have also been diagnosed in 20 subjects presenting in the interval between a negative test and rescreening, and in 83 non-responders. The incidence of cancer in the control group (123 subjects; 10.6% stage A) was 0.72 per 1000 person-years. Cancers detected by screening were at a less advanced pathological stage, but it is too early to show any effect of screening on mortality from colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2566735     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92750-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  92 in total

1.  Colorectal cancer screening. Recommendation statement from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-07-24       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  [Staging of colorectal cancer. Official recommendations of the Canadian Study Group on Preventive Medicine].

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Colorectal cancer screening. Recommendation statement from the Canadian task force on preventive health care.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Effect of faecal occult blood screening on mortality from colorectal cancer: results from a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  J H Scholefield; S Moss; F Sufi; C M Mangham; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Detection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R Jones; S Lydeard
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  Choosing quality of care measures based on the expected impact of improved care on health.

Authors:  A L Siu; E A McGlynn; H Morgenstern; M H Beers; D M Carlisle; E B Keeler; J Beloff; K Curtin; J Leaning; B C Perry
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  Gastroenterology.

Authors:  L J O'Donnell; E M Alstead; M J Farthing
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Is there a preference for different ways of performing faecal occult blood tests?

Authors:  J D Kettner; C Whatrup; J E Verne; K Young; C B Williams; J M Northover
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Detection rate of immunochemical fecal occult blood test for colorectal adenomatous polyps with severe dysplasia.

Authors:  H Nakama; A S Abdul Fattah; B Zhang; N Kamijo; K Fujimori; K Miyata
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 7.527

10.  A systematic review of the effects of screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, hemoccult.

Authors:  B Towler; L Irwig; P Glasziou; J Kewenter; D Weller; C Silagy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.