Literature DB >> 25666115

Design control for clinical translation of 3D printed modular scaffolds.

Scott J Hollister1, Colleen L Flanagan, David A Zopf, Robert J Morrison, Hassan Nasser, Janki J Patel, Edward Ebramzadeh, Sophia N Sangiorgio, Matthew B Wheeler, Glenn E Green.   

Abstract

The primary thrust of tissue engineering is the clinical translation of scaffolds and/or biologics to reconstruct tissue defects. Despite this thrust, clinical translation of tissue engineering therapies from academic research has been minimal in the 27 year history of tissue engineering. Academic research by its nature focuses on, and rewards, initial discovery of new phenomena and technologies in the basic research model, with a view towards generality. Translation, however, by its nature must be directed at specific clinical targets, also denoted as indications, with associated regulatory requirements. These regulatory requirements, especially design control, require that the clinical indication be precisely defined a priori, unlike most academic basic tissue engineering research where the research target is typically open-ended, and furthermore requires that the tissue engineering therapy be constructed according to design inputs that ensure it treats or mitigates the clinical indication. Finally, regulatory approval dictates that the constructed system be verified, i.e., proven that it meets the design inputs, and validated, i.e., that by meeting the design inputs the therapy will address the clinical indication. Satisfying design control requires (1) a system of integrated technologies (scaffolds, materials, biologics), ideally based on a fundamental platform, as compared to focus on a single technology, (2) testing of design hypotheses to validate system performance as opposed to mechanistic hypotheses of natural phenomena, and (3) sequential testing using in vitro, in vivo, large preclinical and eventually clinical tests against competing therapies, as compared to single experiments to test new technologies or test mechanistic hypotheses. Our goal in this paper is to illustrate how design control may be implemented in academic translation of scaffold based tissue engineering therapies. Specifically, we propose to (1) demonstrate a modular platform approach founded on 3D printing for developing tissue engineering therapies and (2) illustrate the design control process for modular implementation of two scaffold based tissue engineering therapies: airway reconstruction and bone tissue engineering based spine fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25666115      PMCID: PMC4407657          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-015-1270-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  28 in total

1.  A novel method for biomaterial scaffold internal architecture design to match bone elastic properties with desired porosity.

Authors:  Cheng Yu Lin; Noboru Kikuchi; Scott J Hollister
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  Teaching medical device design using design control.

Authors:  Karen May-Newman; G Bryan Cornwall
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.166

3.  Multiscale modeling of bone tissue with surface and permeability control.

Authors:  Pedro Gonçalves Coelho; Paulo Rui Fernandes; Helder Carriço Rodrigues
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Numerical modeling of bone tissue adaptation--a hierarchical approach for bone apparent density and trabecular structure.

Authors:  P G Coelho; P R Fernandes; H C Rodrigues; J B Cardoso; J M Guedes
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Design control requirements for medical device development.

Authors:  David Kinsel
Journal:  World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg       Date:  2012-01-01

6.  Porous scaffold design using the distance field and triply periodic minimal surface models.

Authors:  Dong J Yoo
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Predicting the elastic properties of selective laser sintered PCL/β-TCP bone scaffold materials using computational modelling.

Authors:  Heather Doyle; Stefan Lohfeld; Peter McHugh
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering.

Authors:  Jessica M Williams; Adebisi Adewunmi; Rachel M Schek; Colleen L Flanagan; Paul H Krebsbach; Stephen E Feinberg; Scott J Hollister; Suman Das
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-01-23       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  An image-based approach for designing and manufacturing craniofacial scaffolds.

Authors:  S J Hollister; R A Levy; T M Chu; J W Halloran; S E Feinberg
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.789

10.  Treatment of severe porcine tracheomalacia with a 3-dimensionally printed, bioresorbable, external airway splint.

Authors:  David A Zopf; Colleen L Flanagan; Matthew Wheeler; Scott J Hollister; Glenn E Green
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.223

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Recent Advances in Tissue Engineering Strategies for the Treatment of Joint Damage.

Authors:  Makeda K Stephenson; Ashley L Farris; Warren L Grayson
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  3D-printed porous titanium changed femoral head repair growth patterns: osteogenesis and vascularisation in porous titanium.

Authors:  Wei Zhu; Yan Zhao; Qi Ma; Yingjie Wang; Zhihong Wu; Xisheng Weng
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Three-dimensional printing of external airway splints for tracheomalacia.

Authors:  Hester F Shieh; Russell W Jennings
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  The importance of loading the periphery of the vertebral endplate.

Authors:  Joseph Cadman; Chester Sutterlin; Danè Dabirrahmani; Richard Appleyard
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09

5.  A synergistic approach to the design, fabrication and evaluation of 3D printed micro and nano featured scaffolds for vascularized bone tissue repair.

Authors:  Benjamin Holmes; Kartik Bulusu; Michael Plesniak; Lijie Grace Zhang
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.874

6.  Print Me an Organ? Ethical and Regulatory Issues Emerging from 3D Bioprinting in Medicine.

Authors:  Frederic Gilbert; Cathal D O'Connell; Tajanka Mladenovska; Susan Dodds
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Three dimensionally printed bioactive ceramic scaffold osseoconduction across critical-sized mandibular defects.

Authors:  Christopher D Lopez; J Rodrigo Diaz-Siso; Lukasz Witek; Jonathan M Bekisz; Bruce N Cronstein; Andrea Torroni; Roberto L Flores; Eduardo D Rodriguez; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Mitigation of tracheobronchomalacia with 3D-printed personalized medical devices in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Robert J Morrison; Scott J Hollister; Matthew F Niedner; Maryam Ghadimi Mahani; Albert H Park; Deepak K Mehta; Richard G Ohye; Glenn E Green
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 9.  Recent Advances in Extrusion-Based 3D Printing for Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Jesse K Placone; Adam J Engler
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 10.  The role of 3D printing in treating craniomaxillofacial congenital anomalies.

Authors:  Christopher D Lopez; Lukasz Witek; Andrea Torroni; Roberto L Flores; David B Demissie; Simon Young; Bruce N Cronstein; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2018-05-20       Impact factor: 2.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.