Literature DB >> 25665583

Verbal suppression and strategy use: a role for the right lateral prefrontal cortex?

Gail A Robinson1, Lisa Cipolotti2, David G Walker3, Vivien Biggs3, Marco Bozzali4, Tim Shallice5.   

Abstract

Verbal initiation, suppression and strategy generation/use are cognitive processes widely held to be supported by the frontal cortex. The Hayling Test was designed to tap these cognitive processes within the same sentence completion task. There are few studies specifically investigating the neural correlates of the Hayling Test but it has been primarily used to detect frontal lobe damage. This study investigates the components of the Hayling Test in a large sample of patients with unselected focal frontal (n = 60) and posterior (n = 30) lesions. Patients and controls (n = 40) matched for education, age and sex were administered the Hayling Test as well as background cognitive tests. The standard Hayling Test clinical measures (initiation response time, suppression response time, suppression errors and overall score), composite errors scores and strategy-based responses were calculated. Lesions were analysed by classical frontal/posterior subdivisions as well as a finer-grained frontal localization method and a specific contrast method that is somewhat analogous to voxel-based lesion mapping methods. Thus, patients with right lateral, left lateral and superior medial lesions were compared to controls and patients with right lateral lesions were compared to all other patients. The results show that all four standard Hayling Test clinical measures are sensitive to frontal lobe damage although only the suppression error and overall scores were specific to the frontal region. Although all frontal patients produced blatant suppression errors, a specific right lateral frontal effect was revealed for producing errors that were subtly wrong. In addition, frontal patients overall produced fewer correct responses indicative of developing an appropriate strategy but only the right lateral group showed a significant deficit. This problem in strategy attainment and implementation could explain, at least in part, the suppression error impairment. Contrary to previous studies there was no specific frontal effect for verbal initiation. Overall, our results support a role for the right lateral frontal region in verbal suppression and, for the first time, in strategy generation/use.
© The Author (2015). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hayling Test; frontal cortex, neuropsychology; inhibitory processes; strategy generation and use; verbal suppression

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25665583     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awv003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  15 in total

1.  Reply: Strategy and suppression impairments after right lateral and orbito-frontal lesions.

Authors:  Michael Hornberger; Maxime Bertoux
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  An Approach to Neuroimaging Interpersonal Interactions in Mental Health Interventions.

Authors:  James Crum; Xian Zhang; Adam Noah; Antonia Hamilton; Ilias Tachtsidis; Paul W Burgess; Joy Hirsch
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2022-02-07

3.  Verbal inhibition declines among older women with high FMR1 premutation expansions: A prospective study.

Authors:  Nell Maltman; Jessica Klusek; Leann DaWalt; Jinkuk Hong; Audra Sterling; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Marsha R Mailick
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 2.682

4.  The effect of age on cognitive performance of frontal patients.

Authors:  Lisa Cipolotti; Colm Healy; Edgar Chan; Sarah E MacPherson; Mark White; Katherine Woollett; Martha Turner; Gail Robinson; Barbara Spanò; Marco Bozzali; Tim Shallice
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Cognitive screening in brain tumors: short but sensitive enough?

Authors:  Gail A Robinson; Vivien Biggs; David G Walker
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Addressing the selective role of distinct prefrontal areas in response suppression: A study with brain tumor patients.

Authors:  Sandra Arbula; Valentina Pacella; Serena De Pellegrin; Marta Rossetto; Luca Denaro; Domenico D'Avella; Alessandro Della Puppa; Antonino Vallesi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Cognitive reserve and cognitive performance of patients with focal frontal lesions.

Authors:  Sarah E MacPherson; Colm Healy; Michael Allerhand; Barbara Spanò; Carina Tudor-Sfetea; Mark White; Daniela Smirni; Tim Shallice; Edgar Chan; Marco Bozzali; Lisa Cipolotti
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 8.  Changes in Cognition and Decision Making Capacity Following Brain Tumour Resection: Illustrated with Two Cases.

Authors:  Katie Veretennikoff; David Walker; Vivien Biggs; Gail Robinson
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2017-09-24

9.  The role of the right hemisphere in semantic control: A case-series comparison of right and left hemisphere stroke.

Authors:  Hannah E Thompson; Lauren Henshall; Elizabeth Jefferies
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Strategy and suppression impairments after right lateral prefrontal and orbito-frontal lesions.

Authors:  Lisa Cipolotti; Colm Healy; Barbara Spanò; Francesca Lecce; Francesca Biondo; Gail Robinson; Edgar Chan; John Duncan; Tim Shallice; Marco Bozzali
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 13.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.