Literature DB >> 25664935

The misinformation effect is unrelated to the DRM effect with and without a DRM warning.

Dustin P Calvillo1, Jocelyn A Parong1.   

Abstract

The misinformation and Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigms are used to study forms of false memories. Despite the abundance of research using these two paradigms, few studies have examined the relationship between the errors that arise from them. In the present study, 160 participants completed a misinformation task and two DRM tasks, receiving a warning about the effect before the second DRM task. Participants demonstrated misinformation and DRM effects (with and without the warning), but susceptibility to these forms of false memory were not significantly related across individuals. The DRM warning reduced the DRM effect, and signal detection analysis revealed that the DRM warning reduced a liberal response bias in this task. Sensitivity and response bias in both DRM tasks were not significantly related to these measures in the misinformation task. These findings suggest that these two forms of false memories are not interchangeable and they appear to be the result of different cognitive processes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DRM effect; False memory; Misinformation effect

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25664935     DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1005633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  7 in total

1.  Do lateral eye movements increase susceptibility to misinformation? A registered replication.

Authors:  Dustin P Calvillo; Ashley S Emami
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-12

2.  The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory.

Authors:  Enmanuelle Pardilla-Delgado; Jessica D Payne
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Attentional responses on an auditory oddball predict false memory susceptibility.

Authors:  John E Kiat; Dianna Long; Robert F Belli
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 4.  False memories with age: Neural and cognitive underpinnings.

Authors:  Aleea L Devitt; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  False (or biased) memory: Emotion and working memory capacity effects in the DRM paradigm.

Authors:  Elif Yüvrük; Aycan Kapucu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-03-15

6.  Can confidence help account for and redress the effects of reading inaccurate information?

Authors:  Nikita A Salovich; Amalia M Donovan; Scott R Hinze; David N Rapp
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-09-22

Review 7.  What Drives False Memories in Psychopathology? A Case for Associative Activation.

Authors:  Henry Otgaar; Peter Muris; Mark L Howe; Harald Merckelbach
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-09-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.