Literature DB >> 25664901

Patterns and causes of geographic variation in bat echolocation pulses.

Tinglei Jiang1,2, Hui Wu1, Jiang Feng1,2.   

Abstract

Evolutionary biologists have a long-standing interest in how acoustic signals in animals vary geographically, because divergent ecology and sensory perception play an important role in speciation. Geographic comparisons are valuable in determining the factors that influence divergence of acoustic signals. Bats are social mammals and they depend mainly on echolocation pulses to locate prey, to navigate and to communicate. Mounting evidence shows that geographic variation of bat echolocation pulses is common, with a mean 5-10 kHz differences in peak frequency, and a high level of individual variation may be nested in this geographical variation. However, understanding the geographic variation of echolocation pulses in bats is very difficult, because of differences in sample and statistical analysis techniques as well as the variety of factors shaping the vocal geographic evolution. Geographic differences in echolocation pulses of bats generally lack latitudinal, longitudinal and elevational patterns, and little is known about vocal dialects. Evidence is accumulating to support the fact that geographic variation in echolocation pulses of bats may be caused by genetic drift, cultural drift, ecological selection, sexual selection and social selection. Future studies could relate geographic differences in echolocation pulses to social adaptation, vocal learning strategies and patterns of dispersal. In addition, new statistical techniques and acoustic playback experiments may help to illustrate the causes and consequences of the geographic evolution of echolocation pulse in bats.
© 2015 International Society of Zoological Sciences, Institute of Zoology/Chinese Academy of Sciences and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Keywords:  Chiroptera; drift; echolocation; geographic evolution; selection

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25664901     DOI: 10.1111/1749-4877.12129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Zool        ISSN: 1749-4869            Impact factor:   2.654


  6 in total

Review 1.  Behaviour, biology and evolution of vocal learning in bats.

Authors:  Sonja C Vernes; Gerald S Wilkinson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Testing the Sensory Drive Hypothesis: Geographic variation in echolocation frequencies of Geoffroy's horseshoe bat (Rhinolophidae: Rhinolophus clivosus).

Authors:  David S Jacobs; Sarah Catto; Gregory L Mutumi; Nikita Finger; Paul W Webala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Environmental correlates of geographic divergence in a phenotypic trait: A case study using bat echolocation.

Authors:  Tinyiko Maluleke; David S Jacobs; Henning Winker
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Using Approximate Bayesian Computation to infer sex ratios from acoustic data.

Authors:  Lisa Lehnen; Wigbert Schorcht; Inken Karst; Martin Biedermann; Gerald Kerth; Sebastien J Puechmaille
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Sensory Drive Mediated by Climatic Gradients Partially Explains Divergence in Acoustic Signals in Two Horseshoe Bat Species, Rhinolophus swinnyi and Rhinolophus simulator.

Authors:  Gregory L Mutumi; David S Jacobs; Henning Winker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Gene expression vs. sequence divergence: comparative transcriptome sequencing among natural Rhinolophus ferrumequinum populations with different acoustic phenotypes.

Authors:  Hanbo Zhao; Hui Wang; Tong Liu; Sen Liu; Longru Jin; Xiaobin Huang; Wentao Dai; Keping Sun; Jiang Feng
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.172

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.