| Literature DB >> 25663893 |
Sheng Li1, Sheng Jiang2, Wei Jiang1, Yue Zhou1, Xiu-Yin Shen1, Tao Luo1, Ling-Ping Kong1, Hua-Qiao Wang1.
Abstract
Crocetin is the main pharmacologically-active component of saffron and has been considered as a promising candidate for cancer chemoprevention. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the anticancer effects of crocetin and the possible mechanisms of these properties in the esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell line KYSE-150. The KYSE-150 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and incubated with 0, 12.5, 25, 50, 100 or 200 μmol/l crocetin for 48 h. Cell proliferation was measured using an MTT assay. Hoechst 33258 staining and observation under fluorescent microscopy were used to analyze the proapoptotic effects of crocetin. The migration rate was assessed by a wound-healing assay. The cell cycle distribution was analyzed using flow cytometry analysis subsequent to propidium iodide staining. The expression of B-cell lymphoma-2-associated X protein (Bax) and cleaved caspase 3 was determined by western blot analysis. It was found that treatment of KYSE-150 cells with crocetin for 48 h significantly inhibited the proliferation of the cells in a concentration-dependent manner, and the inhibition of proliferation was associated with S phase arrest. Crocetin was also found to induce morphological changes and cell apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner through increased expression of proapoptotic Bax and activated caspase 3. In addition, crocetin suppressed the migration of KYSE-150 cells. The present study provides evidence that crocetin exerts a prominent chemopreventive effect against esophageal cancer through the inhibition of cell proliferation, migration and induction of apoptosis. These findings reveal that crocetin may be considered to be a promising future chemotherapeutic agent for esophageal cancer therapy.Entities:
Keywords: KYSE-150 cells; apoptosis; cell cycle; crocetin; esophageal cancer
Year: 2015 PMID: 25663893 PMCID: PMC4315057 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.2869
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Figure 1Inhibition of cell proliferation effect of crocetin on KYSE-150 cells detected by an MTT assay. The cells were untreated (control) or treated with 12.5, 25, 50, 100 or 200 μmol/l crocetin for 48 h. Assessment of absorbance at 570 nm revealed a significant decrease in the cell viability of crocetin-treated cells compared with control cells (*P<0.05).
Figure 2Morphological changes in KYSE-150 cells. The cells were untreated (control) or treated with 100 or 200 μmol/l crocetin for 48 h, followed by incubation with Hoechst 33258 for 10 min to detect apoptosis. The unstained (A) control group and (B) 100 and (C) 200 μmol/l crocetin-treated cells were viewed using light microscopy. The (D) control group and (E) 100 and (F) 200 μmol/l crocetin-treated cells stained with Hoechst 33258 were viewed using a fluorescent microscope. Scale bar, 100 μm.
Figure 3Migration of KYSE-150 cells was determined by a wound-healing assay. (A) Images of the wounded monolayer of KYSE-150 cells captured immediately subsequent to wounding, and after 24 and 48 h. The cells were untreated (control) or treated with 100 or 200 μmol/l crocetin. (B) Cell migration rate of the three groups, calculated as follows: Migration rate (%) = (original width / closure width) - original width × 100%. *P<0.05 vs. untreated group. Scale bar, 100 μm.
Effect of different concentrations of crocetin on the cell cycle distribution of KYSE-150 cells.
| Distribution of cells, % | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Groups | Crocetin, μmol/l | G0/G1 phase | S phase | G2/M phase |
| Control | 0 | 78.23±1.32 | 12.93±0.41 | 7.03±0.31 |
| Crocetin | 100 | 77.33±0.62 | 17.73±0.56 | 4.10±0.29 |
| 200 | 70.00±0.87 | 23.33±0.88 | 6.52±0.20 | |
Cells were untreated (control) or treated with 100 or 200 μmol/l crocetin for 48 h. The cells were then harvested and stained with propidium iodide for flow cytometric analysis. There was a significantly increased number of KYSE-150 cells in the S phase in the groups treated with crocetin compared with the control cells.
P<0.05 vs. control.
Figure 4The effect of crocetin on (A) B-cell lymphoma-2-associated X protein (Bax) and (B) cleaved caspase 3 protein expression in KYSE-150 cells was detected by western blot analysis. A statistical comparison was made using analysis of variance followed by a least significant difference test. The gray value demonstrated that treating cells with 200 μmol/l crocetin increased the expression of cleaved caspase 3 and Bax. *P<0.05 vs. untreated group.