| Literature DB >> 25663883 |
Xin-Xin Li1, Shu-Yan Gao2, Ping-Yu Wang1, Xue Zhou2, You-Jie Li1, Yuan Yu1, Yun-Fei Yan1, Han-Han Zhang1, Chang-Jun Lv2, Hui-Hui Zhou3, Shu-Yang Xie1.
Abstract
Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) are important in the diagnosis of a number of diseases, since serum or plasma miRNAs are more stable compared with miRNA isolated from blood samples. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between the expression levels of serum let-7c miRNA and the clinical diagnosis of breast cancer (BC). The circulating let-7c levels of 90 BC patients and 64 healthy controls were determined by performing a reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay. The results demonstrated that let-7c expression was downregulated in the BC tissues compared with the paracarcinoma control tissues. In addition, the let-7c expression in the serum of BC patients was significantly lower compared with the healthy controls (P<0.01). Using a cutoff value of 0.374×103 copies/ml, the serum expression levels of let-7c exhibited 87.5% sensitivity and 78.9% specificity for distinguishing BC patients from healthy controls (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.848; 95% confidence interval, 0.785-0.911). Furthermore, the results demonstrated that the serum expression levels of let-7c were significantly higher in premenopausal compared with postmenopausal patients (P<0.05), supporting the hypothesis that postmenopausal status may affect the serum expression levels of let-7c. However, no statistically significant differences were detected in the serum levels of let-7c between ER (or PR)-positive and -negative patients. Therefore, the current study hypothesized that serum let-7c may be used as a novel and valuable biomarker for the diagnosis of BC.Entities:
Keywords: breast cancer; circulating miRNA; let-7c; predictive factor; receiver operating characteristic analysis
Year: 2015 PMID: 25663883 PMCID: PMC4315068 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.2877
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study samples.
| Parameter | Healthy controls (n=64) | Patients (n=90) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 43.781±15.831 | 47.900±9.882 | 0.068 |
| Weight, kg | 62.638±8.844 | 65.408±8.238 | 0.090 |
| Height, cm | 160.500±6.414 | 158.551±4.619 | 0.075 |
| Estrogen receptor-positive/negative, n | - | 64/26 | - |
| Progesterone receptor-positive/negative, n | - | 60/30 | - |
| Premenopausal/postmenopausal, n | 35/29 | 48/42 | 0.998 |
| Median let-7c, ×103 copies/ml | 2.300 | 0.035 | <0.01 |
P-values were determined by performing a Student’s t test or a Wilcoxon rank-sum test to compare the patient samples with the control samples.
Values represented as the mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 1Immunohistochemical analysis of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression levels in breast cancer tissues. Using a limit of >10% nuclear staining to define positive ER and PR status, 64 patients were determine as ER-positive and 60 patients as PR-positive. Scale bar, 150 μm.
Figure 2Detection of let-7c expression levels in (A) tissue samples, using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and (B) serum samples from breast cancer (BC) patients and heathy controls. let-7c expression was significantly lower in the BC tissues compared with the paracarcinoma tissues (n=4; *P<0.01 vs. carcinoma; control, 5S ribosomal RNA). In addition, the serum let-7c expression levels were lower in BC patients (n=90) compared with the healthy controls (n=64; P=0.000). Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation.
Association of ER, PR and menopausal status with let-7c.
| Parameter | Median let-7c, ×103 copies/ml | P-value |
|---|---|---|
| ER | 0.541 | |
| Positive (n=64) | 0.033 | |
| Negative (n=26) | 0.036 | |
| PR | 0.986 | |
| Positive (n=60) | 0.035 | |
| Negative (n=30) | 0.033 | |
| Menopausal status | 0.040 | |
| Premenopausal (n=48) | 0.036 | |
| Postmenopausal (n=42) | 0.032 |
P-values were determined using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to compare premenopausal samples with postmenopausal samples.
ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor.
Figure 3Correlation between serum let-7c expression levels and ER-positive expression in breast cancer (BC) patients. The serum let-7c levels in ER-positive BC patients (n=64) were not significantly different when compared with the ER-negative BC patients (n=26; P=0.541). ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor.
Figure 4Correlation between serum let-7c expression levels and PR-positive expression in breast cancer (BC) patients. No significant difference was identified between the serum let-7c expression levels of the PR-positive (n=60) and PR-negative BC patients (n=30; P=0.986). PR, progesterone receptor; ER, estrogen receptor.
Figure 5Correlation between serum let-7c levels and menopausal status of breast cancer patients. The serum let-7c levels in premenopausal status patients (n=48) were evidently higher compared with those in postmenopausal status patients (n=42; P=0.040).
Figure 6ROC curves for serum let-7c expression levels in breast cancer (BC) patients, indicating an AUC with the diagnostic power to distinguish BC patients from healthy controls. ROC, receiver operating characteristic; AUC, area under the ROC curve; CI, confidence interval.