Literature DB >> 25663605

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: outcomes in primary versus incisional hernias: no effect of defect closure.

J R Lambrecht1, A Vaktskjold, E Trondsen, O M Øyen, O Reiertsen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Supposing divergent aetiology, we found it interesting to investigate outcomes between primary (PH) versus incisional (IH) hernias. In addition, we wanted to analyse the effect of defect closure and mesh fixation techniques.
METHODS: 37 patients with PH and 70 with IH were enrolled in a prospective cohort-study, treated with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) and randomised to ± transfascial sutures. In addition, we analysed results from a retrospective study with 36 PH and 51 IH patients. Mean follow-up time was 38 months in the prospective study and 27 months in the retrospective study.
RESULTS: 35 % of PH's and 10 % of IH's were recurrences after previous suture repair. No late infections or mesh removals occurred. Recurrence rates in the prospective study were 0 vs. 4.3 % (p = 0.55) and the complication rates were 16 vs. 27 % (p = 0.24) in favour of the PH cohort. The IH group had a mesh protrusion rate of 13 vs. 5 % in the PH group (p = 0.32), and significantly (p < 0.01) larger hernias and adhesion score, longer operating time (100 vs. 79 min) and admission time (2.8 vs. 1.6 days). Closure of the hernia defect did not influence rate of seroma, pain at 2 months, protrusion or recurrence. An overall increased complication rate was seen after defect closure (OR 3.42; CI 1.25-9.33).
CONCLUSIONS: With PH, in comparison to IH treated with LVHR, no differences were observed regarding recurrence, protrusion or complication rates. Defect closure (raphe), when using absorbable suture, did not benefit long-term outcomes and caused a higher overall complication rate. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00455299).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25663605     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-015-1345-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  29 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up after elective adult umbilical hernia repair: low recurrence rates also after non-mesh repairs.

Authors:  J Dalenbäck; C Andersson; D Ribokas; G Rimbäck
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 2.  Hernia disease and collagen gene regulation: are there clues for intervention?

Authors:  Petra Lynen Jansen; Uwe Klinge; Peter R Mertens
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Lower reoperation rate for recurrence after mesh versus sutured elective repair in small umbilical and epigastric hernias. A nationwide register study.

Authors:  M W Christoffersen; F Helgstrand; J Rosenberg; H Kehlet; T Bisgaard
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Connective tissue alteration in abdominal wall hernia.

Authors:  N A Henriksen; D H Yadete; L T Sorensen; M S Agren; L N Jorgensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Analysis of collagen-interacting proteins in patients with incisional hernias.

Authors:  R Rosch; K Junge; M Knops; P Lynen; U Klinge; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Chronic complaints after simple sutured repair for umbilical or epigastric hernias may be related to recurrence.

Authors:  Mikkel Westen; Mette W Christoffersen; Lars N Jorgensen; Trine Stigaard; Thue Bisgaard
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Surgical options in lumbar hernia: laparoscopic versus open repair. A long-term prospective study.

Authors:  Alfredo Moreno-Egea; Andres C Alcaraz; Marian C Cuervo
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.058

8.  Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: primary versus secondary hernias.

Authors:  Anuradha Subramanian; Marissa L Clapp; Stephanie C Hicks; Samir S Awad; Mike K Liang
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  Laparoscopic repair of suprapubic incisional hernias: suturing and intraperitoneal composite mesh onlay. A retrospective study.

Authors:  C Palanivelu; M Rangarajan; R Parthasarathi; M V Madankumar; K Senthilkumar
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)-part 1.

Authors:  R Bittner; J Bingener-Casey; U Dietz; M Fabian; G S Ferzli; R H Fortelny; F Köckerling; J Kukleta; K Leblanc; D Lomanto; M C Misra; V K Bansal; S Morales-Conde; B Ramshaw; W Reinpold; S Rim; M Rohr; R Schrittwieser; Th Simon; M Smietanski; B Stechemesser; M Timoney; P Chowbey
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  13 in total

1.  Polypropelene-mesh properties and type of anchoring do not influence strength of parietal ingrowth.

Authors:  S Harsløf; N Zinther; T Harsløf; C Danielsen; P Wara; H Friis-Andersen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Pooled data analysis of primary ventral (PVH) and incisional hernia (IH) repair is no more acceptable: results of a systematic review and metanalysis of current literature.

Authors:  C Stabilini; G Cavallaro; P Dolce; S Capoccia Giovannini; F Corcione; M Frascio; M Sodo; G Merola; U Bracale
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Primary non-complicated midline ventral hernia: is laparoscopic IPOM still a reasonable approach?

Authors:  S Van Hoef; T Tollens
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 4.  Closure versus non-closure of fascial defects in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repairs: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Katsuhito Suwa; Tomoyoshi Okamoto; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Risk-adjusted procedure tailoring leads to uniformly low complication rates in ventral and incisional hernia repair: a propensity score analysis and internal validation of classification criteria.

Authors:  U A Dietz; A Fleischhacker; S Menzel; U Klinge; C Jurowich; K Haas; P Heuschmann; C-T Germer; A Wiegering
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Decreased re-operation rate for recurrence after defect closure in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with a permanent tack fixated mesh: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  J J Baker; S Öberg; K Andresen; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Continuous Laparoscopic Closure of the Linea Alba with Barbed Sutures Combined with Laparoscopic Mesh Implantation (IPOM Plus Repair) As a New Technique for Treatment of Abdominal Hernias.

Authors:  Reiko Wiessner; Thomas Vorwerk; Claudia Tolla-Jensen; Alexander Gehring
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2017-11-02

8.  Retrorectus sublay mesh repair using polypropylene mesh: Cost-effective approach for laparoscopic treatment of ventral abdominal wall hernias.

Authors:  Kalpesh Jani; Samir Contractor
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.407

9.  A systematic review of outcome reporting in incisional hernia surgery.

Authors:  D Harji; C Thomas; S A Antoniou; H Chandraratan; B Griffiths; B T Henniford; L Horgan; F Köckerling; M López-Cano; L Massey; M Miserez; A Montgomery; F Muysoms; B K Poulose; W Reinpold; N Smart
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-03-05

10.  Identifying predictors of ventral hernia recurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S G Parker; S Mallett; L Quinn; C P J Wood; R W Boulton; S Jamshaid; M Erotocritou; S Gowda; W Collier; A A O Plumb; A C J Windsor; L Archer; S Halligan
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-03-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.