PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to validate the Mexican version of the Short-Form Supportive Care Needs survey (SCNS-SFM). METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from June to December 2013 at the Oncology Hospital of the Mexican Institute of Social Security in Mexico City. The study included 825 subsequent cancer patients >20 years of age with all forms of solid cancer. Patients had prior surgical removal of histologically confirmed cancer and attended outpatient consultations. Validation of SCNS-SFM included the following: (1) content validity through a group of experts; (2) construct validity through an exploratory factor analysis based on the polychoric correlation matrix; (3) internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha; (4) convergent validity between SCNS-SFM and quality of life, anxiety, and depression scales by calculating Pearson's correlation coefficient; (5) discriminative validity through analysis of MANOVAs; and (6) test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient calculations. RESULTS: SCNS-SFM has 33 items with five factors accounting for 59 % of total variance. Cronbach's alpha values ranged from 0.78 to 0.90 among factors. SCNS-SFM has good convergent validity compared with quality of life and depression and anxiety scales and good discriminative validity, revealing great information, psychological support, and physical daily living needs for women, patients <60 years, and high physical daily living needs for those with <1 year since cancer diagnosis, with advanced disease stages and current chemo- or radiotherapy. Intraclass correlation coefficient between SCNS-SFM measurements was 0.9. CONCLUSION: SCNS-SFM has acceptable psychometric properties and is suitable to evaluate supportive care needs of cancer patients.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to validate the Mexican version of the Short-Form Supportive Care Needs survey (SCNS-SFM). METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from June to December 2013 at the Oncology Hospital of the Mexican Institute of Social Security in Mexico City. The study included 825 subsequent cancerpatients >20 years of age with all forms of solid cancer. Patients had prior surgical removal of histologically confirmed cancer and attended outpatient consultations. Validation of SCNS-SFM included the following: (1) content validity through a group of experts; (2) construct validity through an exploratory factor analysis based on the polychoric correlation matrix; (3) internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha; (4) convergent validity between SCNS-SFM and quality of life, anxiety, and depression scales by calculating Pearson's correlation coefficient; (5) discriminative validity through analysis of MANOVAs; and (6) test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient calculations. RESULTS: SCNS-SFM has 33 items with five factors accounting for 59 % of total variance. Cronbach's alpha values ranged from 0.78 to 0.90 among factors. SCNS-SFM has good convergent validity compared with quality of life and depression and anxiety scales and good discriminative validity, revealing great information, psychological support, and physical daily living needs for women, patients <60 years, and high physical daily living needs for those with <1 year since cancer diagnosis, with advanced disease stages and current chemo- or radiotherapy. Intraclass correlation coefficient between SCNS-SFM measurements was 0.9. CONCLUSION: SCNS-SFM has acceptable psychometric properties and is suitable to evaluate supportive care needs of cancerpatients.
Authors: A Au; W W T Lam; A Kwong; D Suen; J Tsang; W Yeo; J Suen; W M Ho; T K Yau; I Soong; K Y Wong; W K Sze; A Ng; A Girgis; R Fielding Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2010-09-29 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Joseph Vaglio; Mark Conard; Walker S Poston; James O'Keefe; C Keith Haddock; John House; John A Spertus Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2004-05-13 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Alix G Sleight; Kathleen Doyle Lyons; Cheryl Vigen; Heather Macdonald; Florence Clark Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-05-16 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Femke Jansen; Birgit I Witte; Cornelia F van Uden-Kraan; Anna M Braspenning; C René Leemans; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-06-18 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Adriana Pérez-Fortis; Joke Fleer; Juan José Sánchez-Sosa; María Guadalupe Veloz-Martínez; Patricia Alanís-López; Maya J Schroevers; Adelita V Ranchor Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-05-17 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Edmond Pui Hang Choi; Qiuyan Liao; Inda Soong; Karen Kar Loen Chan; Conrad C Y Lee; Alice Ng; Wing Kin Sze; Janice Wing Hang Tsang; Victor Ho Fun Lee; Wendy Wing Tak Lam Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2020-02-17 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Svetlana V Doubova; Ingrid Patricia Martinez-Vega; Marcos Gutiérrez-De-la-Barrera; Claudia Infante-Castañeda; Carlos E Aranda-Flores; Adriana Monroy; Laura Gómez-Laguna; Felicia Marie Knaul; Ricardo Pérez-Cuevas Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-03-16 Impact factor: 2.692