Literature DB >> 25663395

The evaluation of different forest structural indices to predict the stand aboveground biomass of even-aged Scotch pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) forests in Kunduz, Northern Turkey.

İlker Ercanli1, Aydın Kahriman.   

Abstract

We assessed the effect of stand structural diversity, including the Shannon, improved Shannon, Simpson, McIntosh, Margelef, and Berger-Parker indices, on stand aboveground biomass (AGB) and developed statistical prediction models for the stand AGB values, including stand structural diversity indices and some stand attributes. The AGB prediction model, including only stand attributes, accounted for 85 % of the total variance in AGB (R (2)) with an Akaike's information criterion (AIC) of 807.2407, Bayesian information criterion (BIC) of 809.5397, Schwarz Bayesian criterion (SBC) of 818.0426, and root mean square error (RMSE) of 38.529 Mg. After inclusion of the stand structural diversity into the model structure, considerable improvement was observed in statistical accuracy, including 97.5 % of the total variance in AGB, with an AIC of 614.1819, BIC of 617.1242, SBC of 633.0853, and RMSE of 15.8153 Mg. The predictive fitting results indicate that some indices describing the stand structural diversity can be employed as significant independent variables to predict the AGB production of the Scotch pine stand. Further, including the stand diversity indices in the AGB prediction model with the stand attributes provided important predictive contributions in estimating the total variance in AGB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25663395     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-014-4248-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  6 in total

1.  Plant diversity and productivity experiments in european grasslands

Authors:  A Hector; B Schmid; C Beierkuhnlein; M C Caldeira; M Diemer; P G Dimitrakopoulos; J A Finn; H Freitas; P S Giller; J Good; R Harris; P Hogberg; K Huss-Danell; J Joshi; A Jumpponen; C Korner; P W Leadley; M Loreau; A Minns; C P Mulder; G O'Donovan; S J Otway; J S Pereira; A Prinz; D J Read; M Scherer-Lorenzen; E D Schulze; A S D Siamantziouras; E M Spehn; A C Terry; A Y Troumbis; F I Woodward; S Yachi; J H Lawton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-11-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services.

Authors:  Patricia Balvanera; Andrea B Pfisterer; Nina Buchmann; Jing-Shen He; Tohru Nakashizuka; David Raffaelli; Bernhard Schmid
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  Impacts of plant diversity on biomass production increase through time because of species complementarity.

Authors:  Bradley J Cardinale; Justin P Wright; Marc W Cadotte; Ian T Carroll; Andy Hector; Diane S Srivastava; Michel Loreau; Jerome J Weis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Woody species diversity influences productivity and soil nutrient availability in tropical plantations.

Authors:  Jennifer Firn; Peter D Erskine; David Lamb
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Diversity of planktonic foraminifera in deep-sea sediments.

Authors:  W H Berger; F L Parker
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-06-12       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Does tree diversity increase wood production in pine forests?

Authors:  Montserrat Vilà; Jordi Vayreda; Carles Gracia; Joan Josep Ibáñez
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 3.225

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.