Literature DB >> 17991772

Impacts of plant diversity on biomass production increase through time because of species complementarity.

Bradley J Cardinale1, Justin P Wright, Marc W Cadotte, Ian T Carroll, Andy Hector, Diane S Srivastava, Michel Loreau, Jerome J Weis.   

Abstract

Accelerating rates of species extinction have prompted a growing number of researchers to manipulate the richness of various groups of organisms and examine how this aspect of diversity impacts ecological processes that control the functioning of ecosystems. We summarize the results of 44 experiments that have manipulated the richness of plants to examine how plant diversity affects the production of biomass. We show that mixtures of species produce an average of 1.7 times more biomass than species monocultures and are more productive than the average monoculture in 79% of all experiments. However, in only 12% of all experiments do diverse polycultures achieve greater biomass than their single most productive species. Previously, a positive net effect of diversity that is no greater than the most productive species has been interpreted as evidence for selection effects, which occur when diversity maximizes the chance that highly productive species will be included in and ultimately dominate the biomass of polycultures. Contrary to this, we show that although productive species do indeed contribute to diversity effects, these contributions are equaled or exceeded by species complementarity, where biomass is augmented by biological processes that involve multiple species. Importantly, both the net effect of diversity and the probability of polycultures being more productive than their most productive species increases through time, because the magnitude of complementarity increases as experiments are run longer. Our results suggest that experiments to date have, if anything, underestimated the impacts of species extinction on the productivity of ecosystems.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17991772      PMCID: PMC2084307          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0709069104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  17 in total

Review 1.  Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100.

Authors:  O E Sala; F S Chapin; J J Armesto; E Berlow; J Bloomfield; R Dirzo; E Huber-Sanwald; L F Huenneke; R B Jackson; A Kinzig; R Leemans; D M Lodge; H A Mooney; M Oesterheld; N L Poff; M T Sykes; B H Walker; M Walker; D H Wall
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations.

Authors:  D Tilman; C L Lehman; K T Thomson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-03-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Species diversity enhances ecosystem functioning through interspecific facilitation.

Authors:  Bradley J Cardinale; Margaret A Palmer; Scott L Collins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment.

Authors:  D Tilman; P B Reich; J Knops; D Wedin; T Mielke; C Lehman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges.

Authors:  M Loreau; S Naeem; P Inchausti; J Bengtsson; J P Grime; A Hector; D U Hooper; M A Huston; D Raffaelli; B Schmid; D Tilman; D A Wardle
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments.

Authors:  M Loreau; A Hector
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Effects of macrophyte species richness on wetland ecosystem functioning and services.

Authors:  K A Engelhardt; M E Ritchie
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-06-07       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Physical stress and diversity-productivity relationships: the role of positive interactions.

Authors:  C P Mulder; D D Uliassi; D F Doak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Plant diversity and productivity experiments in european grasslands

Authors:  A Hector; B Schmid; C Beierkuhnlein; M C Caldeira; M Diemer; P G Dimitrakopoulos; J A Finn; H Freitas; P S Giller; J Good; R Harris; P Hogberg; K Huss-Danell; J Joshi; A Jumpponen; C Korner; P W Leadley; M Loreau; A Minns; C P Mulder; G O'Donovan; S J Otway; J S Pereira; A Prinz; D J Read; M Scherer-Lorenzen; E D Schulze; A S D Siamantziouras; E M Spehn; A C Terry; A Y Troumbis; F I Woodward; S Yachi; J H Lawton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-11-05       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Diversity-productivity relationships: initial effects, long-term patterns, and underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  Jasper van Ruijven; Frank Berendse
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  180 in total

1.  Complementarity in root architecture for nutrient uptake in ancient maize/bean and maize/bean/squash polycultures.

Authors:  Johannes A Postma; Jonathan P Lynch
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Plant-soil feedbacks provide an additional explanation for diversity-productivity relationships.

Authors:  Andrew Kulmatiski; Karen H Beard; Justin Heavilin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The Sabah Biodiversity Experiment: a long-term test of the role of tree diversity in restoring tropical forest structure and functioning.

Authors:  Andy Hector; Christopher Philipson; Philippe Saner; Juliette Chamagne; Dzaeman Dzulkifli; Michael O'Brien; Jake L Snaddon; Philip Ulok; Maja Weilenmann; Glen Reynolds; H Charles J Godfray
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Ecological succession in long-term experimentally evolved biofilms produces synergistic communities.

Authors:  Steffen R Poltak; Vaughn S Cooper
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Legume species differ in the responses of their functional traits to plant diversity.

Authors:  Christiane Roscher; Bernhard Schmid; Nina Buchmann; Alexandra Weigelt; Ernst-Detlef Schulze
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Experimental niche evolution alters the strength of the diversity–productivity relationship.

Authors:  Dominique Gravel; Thomas Bell; Claire Barbera; Thierry Bouvier; Thomas Pommier; Patrick Venail; Nicolas Mouquet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The extent of functional redundancy changes as species' roles shift in different environments.

Authors:  Ingo Fetzer; Karin Johst; Robert Schäwe; Thomas Banitz; Hauke Harms; Antonis Chatzinotas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Relationships between arthropod richness, evenness, and diversity are altered by complementarity among plant genotypes.

Authors:  Scott H McArt; Susan C Cook-Patton; Jennifer S Thaler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  The evaluation of different forest structural indices to predict the stand aboveground biomass of even-aged Scotch pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) forests in Kunduz, Northern Turkey.

Authors:  İlker Ercanli; Aydın Kahriman
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.513

10.  Effects of genotypic diversity of Phragmites australis on primary productivity and water quality in an experimental wetland.

Authors:  Hiroshi Tomimatsu; Kazunori Nakano; Nozomi Yamamoto; Yoshihisa Suyama
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.