Literature DB >> 25663329

Does the stoichiometric carbon:phosphorus knife edge apply for predaceous copepods?

Cecilia Laspoumaderes1, Beatriz Modenutti, James J Elser, Esteban Balseiro.   

Abstract

Recent work has indicated that stoichiometric food quality in terms of the carbon:phosphorus (C:P) ratio affects consumers whether the imbalance involves a deficit or an excess of nutrients; hence, organisms exist on a "stoichiometric knife edge". While previous studies have focused primarily on autotroph-herbivore trophic transfer, nutritional imbalances may also affect the interactions between species at higher trophic levels. Since the foods of carnivores are normally stoichiometrically similar to the body compositions of those carnivores, they may be more severely affected than herbivores if imbalances become pronounced. We analysed the response of the predatory copepod Parabroteas sarsi to monospecific diet treatments consisting of high and low C:P prey items. These dietary treatments strongly affected the predator's elemental composition and growth, although prey selection, excretion, egestion, and respiration rates were not affected. We suggest that, due to their low threshold elemental ratio and a narrow C:P stoichiometric knife edge, these predators are highly vulnerable to stoichiometric imbalances, whether an excess or a deficit of nutrients is involved. Our results demonstrating this high sensitivity to prey C:P ratio show that the stoichiometric knife edge may apply to not only herbivores but also higher trophic levels. Thus, predators such as P. sarsi, with a much narrower range of food quality, may also be strongly affected by fluctuations in the quality of their prey, with negative consequences for their secondary production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25663329     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-014-3155-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  16 in total

1.  Optimal foraging for specific nutrients in predatory beetles.

Authors:  Kim Jensen; David Mayntz; Søren Toft; Fiona J Clissold; John Hunt; David Raubenheimer; Stephen J Simpson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Nutrient-specific foraging in invertebrate predators.

Authors:  David Mayntz; David Raubenheimer; Mor Salomon; Søren Toft; Stephen J Simpson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Threshold elemental ratios of carbon and phosphorus in aquatic consumers.

Authors:  Paul C Frost; Jonathan P Benstead; Wyatt F Cross; Helmut Hillebrand; James H Larson; Marguerite A Xenopoulos; Takehito Yoshida
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 4.  Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry.

Authors:  David I Warton; Ian J Wright; Daniel S Falster; Mark Westoby
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2006-03-30

Review 5.  Modelling nutritional interactions: from individuals to communities.

Authors:  Stephen J Simpson; David Raubenheimer; Michael A Charleston; Fiona J Clissold
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Glacier melting and stoichiometric implications for lake community structure: zooplankton species distributions across a natural light gradient.

Authors:  Cecilia Laspoumaderes; Beatriz Modenutti; María Sol Souza; Marcela Bastidas Navarro; Florencia Cuassolo; Esteban Balseiro
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 10.863

7.  Geometric analysis of macronutrient selection in the adult domestic cat, Felis catus.

Authors:  Adrian K Hewson-Hughes; Victoria L Hewson-Hughes; Andrew T Miller; Simon R Hall; Stephen J Simpson; David Raubenheimer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  How Daphnia copes with excess carbon in its food.

Authors:  François Darchambeau; Per J Faerøvig; Dag O Hessen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  The nutritional content of prey affects the foraging of a generalist arthropod predator.

Authors:  Jason M Schmidt; Peter Sebastian; Shawn M Wilder; Ann L Rypstra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Food quality affects secondary consumers even at low quantities: an experimental test with larval European lobster.

Authors:  Katherina L Schoo; Nicole Aberle; Arne M Malzahn; Maarten Boersma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Herbivore consumers face different challenges along opposite sides of the stoichiometric knife-edge.

Authors:  Libin Zhou; Steven A J Declerck
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 9.492

2.  Caught in the web: Spider web architecture affects prey specialization and spider-prey stoichiometric relationships.

Authors:  Lorraine Ludwig; Matthew A Barbour; Jennifer Guevara; Leticia Avilés; Angélica L González
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.912

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.