Literature DB >> 25663048

Pseudotumor formation and serum ions after large head metal-on-metal stemmed total hip replacement. Risk factors, time course and revisions in 706 hips.

B H Bosker1, H B Ettema, M van Rossum, M F Boomsma, B J Kollen, M Maas, C C P M Verheyen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The incidence and natural course of pseudotumors in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties is largely unknown. The objective of this study was to identify the true incidence and risk factors of pseudotumor formation in large head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Incidence, time course and risk factors for pseudotumor formation were analysed after large femoral head MoM-THA. We defined a pseudotumor as a (semi-)solid or cystic peri-prosthetic soft-tissue mass with a diameter ≥2 cm that could not be attributed to infection, malignancy, bursa or scar tissue. All patients treated in our clinic with MoM-THA's were contacted. CT scan, metal ions and X-rays were obtained. Symptoms were recorded.
RESULTS: After median follow-up of 3 years, 706 hips were screened in 626 patients. There were 228 pseudotumors (32.3 %) in 219 patients (35.0 %). Pseudotumor formation significantly increased after prolonged follow-up. Seventy-six hips (10.8 %) were revised in 73 patients (11.7 %), independent risk factors were identified. Best cutoff point for cobalt and chromium was 4 μg/l (68 and 77 nmol/l).
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms a high incidence of pseudotumors, dramatically increasing after prolonged follow-up. Risk factors for pseudotumors are of limited importance. Pain was the strongest predictor for pseudotumor presence; cobalt chromium and swelling were considered poor predictors. Cross-sectional imaging is the main screening tool during follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25663048     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-015-2165-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  15 in total

1.  CORR Insights(®): do patients with a failed metal-on-metal hip implant with a pseudotumor present differences in their peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations?

Authors:  Nadim James Hallab
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Development and first validation of a simplified CT-based classification system of soft tissue changes in large-head metal-on-metal total hip replacement: intra- and interrater reliability and association with revision rates in a uniform cohort of 664 arthroplasties.

Authors:  Martijn F Boomsma; Mireille A Edens; Christiaan P Van Lingen; Niek Warringa; Harmen B Ettema; Cees C P M Verheyen; Mario Maas
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  What Is the Clinical Presentation of Adverse Local Tissue Reaction in Metal-on-metal Hip Arthroplasty? An MRI Study.

Authors:  Vincent P Galea; Inari Laaksonen; James W Connelly; Sean J Matuszak; Marc Nortje; Rami Madanat; Orhun Muratoglu; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Long-term survival analysis of cementless large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Elli Holappa; Jukka Kettunen; Hannu Miettinen; Heikki Kröger; Simo Miettinen
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 2.928

5.  Metallosis with pseudotumour formation: Long-term complication following cementless total hip replacement in a dog.

Authors:  Nicola J Volstad; Susan L Schaefer; Laura A Snyder; Jeffrey B Meinen; Susannah J Sample
Journal:  Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 1.358

6.  Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: is there still a role in 2016?

Authors:  Edward J Silverman; Blair Ashley; Neil P Sheth
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

Review 7.  Systemic and local toxicity of metal debris released from hip prostheses: A review of experimental approaches.

Authors:  Divya Rani Bijukumar; Abhijith Segu; Júlio C M Souza; XueJun Li; Mark Barba; Louis G Mercuri; Joshua J Jacobs; Mathew Thoppil Mathew
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 5.307

Review 8.  Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty: A Review of Adverse Reactions and Patient Management.

Authors:  James Drummond; Phong Tran; Camdon Fary
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2015-06-26

9.  Quantitative analysis of orthopedic metal artefact reduction in 64-slice computed tomography scans in large head metal-on-metal total hip replacement, a phantom study.

Authors:  Martijn F Boomsma; Niek Warringa; Mireille A Edens; Dirk Mueller; Harmen B Ettema; Cees C P M Verheyen; Mario Maas
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-04-02

10.  Cobalt Alloy Implant Debris Induces Inflammation and Bone Loss Primarily through Danger Signaling, Not TLR4 Activation: Implications for DAMP-ening Implant Related Inflammation.

Authors:  Lauryn Samelko; Stefan Landgraeber; Kyron McAllister; Joshua Jacobs; Nadim James Hallab
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.