Literature DB >> 25662894

Effectiveness of secondary prevention and treatment interventions for crack-cocaine abuse: a comprehensive narrative overview of English-language studies.

Benedikt Fischer1, Peter Blanken2, Dartiu Da Silveira3, Andrea Gallassi4, Elliot M Goldner5, Jürgen Rehm6, Mark Tyndall7, Evan Wood8.   

Abstract

There are an estimated several million crack-cocaine users globally; use is highest in the Americas. Most crack users are socio-economically marginalized (e.g., homeless), and feature elevated risks for morbidity (e.g., blood-borne viruses), mortality and crime/violence involvement, resulting in extensive burdens. No comprehensive reviews of evidence-based prevention and/or treatment interventions specifically for crack use exist. We conducted a comprehensive narrative overview of English-language studies on the efficacy of secondary prevention and treatment interventions for crack (cocaine) abuse/dependence. Literature searches (1990-2014) using pertinent keywords were conducted in main scientific databases. Titles/abstracts were reviewed for relevance, and full studies were included in the review if involving a primary prevention/treatment intervention study comprising a substantive crack user sample. Intervention outcomes considered included drug use, health risks/status (e.g., HIV or sexual risks) and select social outcome indicators. Targeted (e.g., behavioral/community-based) prevention measures show mixed and short-term effects on crack use/HIV risk outcomes. Material (e.g., safer crack use kit distribution) interventions also document modest efficacy in risk reduction; empirical assessments of environmental (e.g., drug consumption facilities) for crack smokers are not available. Diverse psycho-social treatment (including contingency management) interventions for crack abuse/dependence show some positive but also limited/short-term efficacy, yet likely constitute best currently available treatment options. Ancillary treatments show little effects but are understudied. Despite ample studies, pharmaco-therapeutic/immunotherapy treatment agents have not produced convincing evidence; select agents may hold potential combined with personalized approaches and/or psycho-social strategies. No comprehensively effective 'gold-standard' prevention/treatment interventions for crack abuse exist; concerted research towards improved interventions is urgently needed.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crack-cocaine; Dependence; Intervention; Prevention; Review; Treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25662894     DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Drug Policy        ISSN: 0955-3959


  18 in total

1.  Un Jalón, Un Volteón, y Otra Vez: High-Risk Crack Smoking Paraphernalia in México City.

Authors:  Avelardo Valdez; Kathryn M Nowotny; Nalini Negi; Eduardo Zafra Mora; Alice Cepeda
Journal:  J Psychoactive Drugs       Date:  2016-06-29

2.  Knowledge of hepatitis C and treatment willingness amongst people who inject drugs in an era of direct acting antivirals.

Authors:  Allison Mah; Mark W Hull; Kora DeBeck; Michael John Milloy; Sabina Dobrer; Ekaterina Nosova; Evan Wood; Thomas Kerr; Kanna Hayashi
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2017-03-24

3.  Oral HPV among people who use crack-cocaine: prevalence, genotypes, risk factors, and key interventions in a remote Northern Brazilian region.

Authors:  Mayara Sabrina A Rodrigues; Raquel Silva Nascimento; Ricardo Roberto S Fonseca; Gláucia C Silva-Oliveira; Luiz Fernando A Machado; Emil Kupek; Benedikt Fischer; Aldemir B Oliveira-Filho
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  More behavioral recommendations produce more change: A meta-analysis of efficacy of multibehavior recommendations to reduce nonmedical substance use.

Authors:  Wenhao Dai; Ryan Palmer; Aashna Sunderrajan; Marta Durantini; Flor Sánchez; Laura R Glasman; Fan Xuan Chen; Dolores Albarracín
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2020-04-20

5.  Intentional cannabis use to reduce crack cocaine use in a Canadian setting: A longitudinal analysis.

Authors:  M Eugenia Socías; Thomas Kerr; Evan Wood; Huiru Dong; Stephanie Lake; Kanna Hayashi; Kora DeBeck; Didier Jutras-Aswad; Julio Montaner; M-J Milloy
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 6.  The effectiveness of compulsory drug treatment: A systematic review.

Authors:  D Werb; A Kamarulzaman; M C Meacham; C Rafful; B Fischer; S A Strathdee; E Wood
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2015-12-18

7.  Intervention Reach and Sexual Risk Reduction of a Multi-level, Community-Based HIV Prevention Intervention for Crack Users in San Salvador, El Salvador.

Authors:  Julia Dickson-Gomez; Sergey Tarima; Laura R Glasman; Julia Lechuga; Gloria Bodnar; Lorena Rivas de Mendoza
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2019-05

8.  Cocaine and Marijuana Polysubstance Use and Cocaine Use Disorder: Investigating Mediated Effects through Patterns of Cocaine Use.

Authors:  Yiyang Liu; JeeWon Cheong; Barry Setlow; Linda B Cottler
Journal:  J Dual Diagn       Date:  2020-12-10

Review 9.  All-cause and cause-specific mortality among people with regular or problematic cocaine use: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amy Peacock; Lucy Thi Tran; Sarah Larney; Emily Stockings; Thomas Santo; Hayley Jones; Damian Santomauro; Louisa Degenhardt
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 6.526

10.  Evidence-Based Guidelines and Secondary Meta-Analysis for the Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders.

Authors:  Felipe Fregni; Mirret M El-Hagrassy; Kevin Pacheco-Barrios; Sandra Carvalho; Jorge Leite; Marcel Simis; Jerome Brunelin; Ester Miyuki Nakamura-Palacios; Paola Marangolo; Ganesan Venkatasubramanian; Daniel San-Juan; Wolnei Caumo; Marom Bikson; André R Brunoni
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 5.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.