Literature DB >> 25661325

Uncertainty quantification of fast sodium current steady-state inactivation for multi-scale models of cardiac electrophysiology.

Pras Pathmanathan1, Matthew S Shotwell2, David J Gavaghan3, Jonathan M Cordeiro4, Richard A Gray5.   

Abstract

Perhaps the most mature area of multi-scale systems biology is the modelling of the heart. Current models are grounded in over fifty years of research in the development of biophysically detailed models of the electrophysiology (EP) of cardiac cells, but one aspect which is inadequately addressed is the incorporation of uncertainty and physiological variability. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is the identification and characterisation of the uncertainty in model parameters derived from experimental data, and the computation of the resultant uncertainty in model outputs. It is a necessary tool for establishing the credibility of computational models, and will likely be expected of EP models for future safety-critical clinical applications. The focus of this paper is formal UQ of one major sub-component of cardiac EP models, the steady-state inactivation of the fast sodium current, INa. To better capture average behaviour and quantify variability across cells, we have applied for the first time an 'individual-based' statistical methodology to assess voltage clamp data. Advantages of this approach over a more traditional 'population-averaged' approach are highlighted. The method was used to characterise variability amongst cells isolated from canine epi and endocardium, and this variability was then 'propagated forward' through a canine model to determine the resultant uncertainty in model predictions at different scales, such as of upstroke velocity and spiral wave dynamics. Statistically significant differences between epi and endocardial cells (greater half-inactivation and less steep slope of steady state inactivation curve for endo) was observed, and the forward propagation revealed a lack of robustness of the model to underlying variability, but also surprising robustness to variability at the tissue scale. Overall, the methodology can be used to: (i) better analyse voltage clamp data; (ii) characterise underlying population variability; (iii) investigate consequences of variability; and (iv) improve the ability to validate a model. To our knowledge this article is the first to quantify population variability in membrane dynamics in this manner, and the first to perform formal UQ for a component of a cardiac model. The approach is likely to find much wider applicability across systems biology as current application domains reach greater levels of maturity. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac modelling; Nonlinear mixed effects modelling; Population variability; Uncertainty quantification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25661325      PMCID: PMC4472478          DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2015.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol        ISSN: 0079-6107            Impact factor:   3.667


  28 in total

Review 1.  Exploiting mathematical models to illuminate electrophysiological variability between individuals.

Authors:  Amrita X Sarkar; David J Christini; Eric A Sobie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Rate dependence and regulation of action potential and calcium transient in a canine cardiac ventricular cell model.

Authors:  Thomas J Hund; Yoram Rudy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-10-25       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  A meta-analysis of cardiac electrophysiology computational models.

Authors:  S A Niederer; M Fink; D Noble; N P Smith
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 2.969

4.  Functionally distinct sodium channels in ventricular epicardial and endocardial cells contribute to a greater sensitivity of the epicardium to electrical depression.

Authors:  J M Cordeiro; M Mazza; R Goodrow; N Ulahannan; C Antzelevitch; J M Di Diego
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 4.733

5.  Mechanisms of atrial-selective block of Na⁺ channels by ranolazine: II. Insights from a mathematical model.

Authors:  Vladislav V Nesterenko; Andrew C Zygmunt; Sridharan Rajamani; Luiz Belardinelli; Charles Antzelevitch
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 4.733

6.  Extracellular proton depression of peak and late Na⁺ current in the canine left ventricle.

Authors:  Lisa Murphy; Danielle Renodin; Charles Antzelevitch; José M Di Diego; Jonathan M Cordeiro
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 4.733

7.  Variability in high-throughput ion-channel screening data and consequences for cardiac safety assessment.

Authors:  Ryan C Elkins; Mark R Davies; Stephen J Brough; David J Gavaghan; Yi Cui; Najah Abi-Gerges; Gary R Mirams
Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 1.950

8.  Development of an anatomically detailed MRI-derived rabbit ventricular model and assessment of its impact on simulations of electrophysiological function.

Authors:  Martin J Bishop; Gernot Plank; Rebecca A B Burton; Jürgen E Schneider; David J Gavaghan; Vicente Grau; Peter Kohl
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 4.733

9.  Computational cardiology: the heart of the matter.

Authors:  Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  ISRN Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-14

10.  Chaste: an open source C++ library for computational physiology and biology.

Authors:  Gary R Mirams; Christopher J Arthurs; Miguel O Bernabeu; Rafel Bordas; Jonathan Cooper; Alberto Corrias; Yohan Davit; Sara-Jane Dunn; Alexander G Fletcher; Daniel G Harvey; Megan E Marsh; James M Osborne; Pras Pathmanathan; Joe Pitt-Francis; James Southern; Nejib Zemzemi; David J Gavaghan
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  24 in total

1.  Sensitivity analysis of an electrophysiology model for the left ventricle.

Authors:  Giulio Del Corso; Roberto Verzicco; Francesco Viola
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  An audit of uncertainty in multi-scale cardiac electrophysiology models.

Authors:  Richard H Clayton; Yasser Aboelkassem; Chris D Cantwell; Cesare Corrado; Tammo Delhaas; Wouter Huberts; Chon Lok Lei; Haibo Ni; Alexander V Panfilov; Caroline Roney; Rodrigo Weber Dos Santos
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Sensitivity of a data-assimilation system for reconstructing three-dimensional cardiac electrical dynamics.

Authors:  Matthew J Hoffman; Elizabeth M Cherry
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Potassium currents in the heart: functional roles in repolarization, arrhythmia and therapeutics.

Authors:  Nipavan Chiamvimonvat; Ye Chen-Izu; Colleen E Clancy; Isabelle Deschenes; Dobromir Dobrev; Jordi Heijman; Leighton Izu; Zhilin Qu; Crystal M Ripplinger; Jamie I Vandenberg; James N Weiss; Gideon Koren; Tamas Banyasz; Eleonora Grandi; Michael C Sanguinetti; Donald M Bers; Jeanne M Nerbonne
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Using physiologically based models for clinical translation: predictive modelling, data interpretation or something in-between?

Authors:  Steven A Niederer; Nic P Smith
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-07-03       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 6.  Calibration of ionic and cellular cardiac electrophysiology models.

Authors:  Dominic G Whittaker; Michael Clerx; Chon Lok Lei; David J Christini; Gary R Mirams
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2020-02-21

Review 7.  Multiphysics and multiscale modelling, data-model fusion and integration of organ physiology in the clinic: ventricular cardiac mechanics.

Authors:  Radomir Chabiniok; Vicky Y Wang; Myrianthi Hadjicharalambous; Liya Asner; Jack Lee; Maxime Sermesant; Ellen Kuhl; Alistair A Young; Philippe Moireau; Martyn P Nash; Dominique Chapelle; David A Nordsletten
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  Hierarchical Bayesian inference for ion channel screening dose-response data.

Authors:  Ross H Johnstone; Rémi Bardenet; David J Gavaghan; Gary R Mirams
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2016-11-15

9.  Uncertainty and variability in models of the cardiac action potential: Can we build trustworthy models?

Authors:  Ross H Johnstone; Eugene T Y Chang; Rémi Bardenet; Teun P de Boer; David J Gavaghan; Pras Pathmanathan; Richard H Clayton; Gary R Mirams
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 5.000

10.  Uncertainty and variability in computational and mathematical models of cardiac physiology.

Authors:  Gary R Mirams; Pras Pathmanathan; Richard A Gray; Peter Challenor; Richard H Clayton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.