Literature DB >> 25661116

Which phacoemulsification modalities are the best? Comparing apples to apples.

Nick Mamalis.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25661116     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Prospective study of Centurion® versus Infiniti® phacoemulsification systems: surgical and visual outcomes.

Authors:  Lawrence J Oh; Chu Luan Nguyen; Eugene Wong; Samuel S Y Wang; Ian C Francis
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  A novel method to compare phacoemulsification parameters in vivo: two halves of one nucleus.

Authors:  Elena Tomilova; Sergey Shukhaev
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Effect of IOP based infusion system with and without balanced phaco tip on cumulative dissipated energy and estimated fluid usage in comparison to gravity fed infusion in torsional phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Praveen K Malik; Taru Dewan; Arun Kr Patidar; Ekta Sain
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2017-09-17

4.  Clinical Performance and Surgeon Acceptability of a New Dual Mode Phacoemulsification System.

Authors:  Gabriel Quesada; Daniel H Chang; Kevin L Waltz; Andrew A Kao; Rodrigo Quesada; Ying Wang; Leilei Ji; Dari Parizadeh; Luis Atiles
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-06

5.  Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy between the Infiniti and Centurion phacoemulsification systems.

Authors:  Ming Chen; Erik Anderson; Geoffrey Hill; John J Chen; Thomas Patrianakos
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.