Literature DB >> 25660739

Single-step genomic evaluation using multitrait random regression model and test-day data.

M Koivula1, I Strandén2, J Pösö3, G P Aamand4, E A Mäntysaari2.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the feasibility of use of the test-day (TD) single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) using phenotypic records of Nordic Red Dairy cows. The critical point in ssGBLUP is how genomically derived relationships (G) are integrated with population-based pedigree relationships (A) into a combined relationship matrix (H). Therefore, we also tested how different weights for genomic and pedigree relationships affect ssGBLUP, validation reliability, and validation regression coefficients. Deregressed proofs for 305-d milk, protein, and fat yields were used for a posteriori validation. The results showed that the use of phenotypic TD records in ssGBLUP is feasible. Moreover, the TD ssGBLUP model gave considerably higher validation reliabilities and validation regression coefficients than the TD model without genomic information. No significant differences were found in validation reliability between the different TD ssGBLUP models according to bootstrap confidence intervals. However, the degree of inflation in genomic enhanced breeding values is affected by the method used in construction of the H matrix. The results showed that ssGBLUP provides a good alternative to the currently used multi-step approach but there is a great need to find the best option to combine pedigree and genomic information in the genomic matrix.
Copyright © 2015 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nordic Red Dairy cow; genomic evaluation; single step; single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP); test-day model

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25660739     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-8975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  11 in total

1.  Incorporating the single-step strategy into a random regression model to enhance genomic prediction of longitudinal traits.

Authors:  H Kang; L Zhou; R Mrode; Q Zhang; J-F Liu
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  The impact of selective genotyping on the response to selection using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.

Authors:  Jeremy T Howard; Tom A Rathje; Caitlyn E Bruns; Danielle F Wilson-Wells; Stephen D Kachman; Matthew L Spangler
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Single-step SNP-BLUP with on-the-fly imputed genotypes and residual polygenic effects.

Authors:  Matti Taskinen; Esa A Mäntysaari; Ismo Strandén
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  Genomic Estimated Breeding Value of Milk Performance and Fertility Traits in the Russian Black-and-White Cattle Population.

Authors:  F S Sharko; A Khatib; E B Prokhortchouk
Journal:  Acta Naturae       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.204

5.  The effect of the H-1 scaling factors τ and ω on the structure of H in the single-step procedure.

Authors:  Johannes W R Martini; Matias F Schrauf; Carolina A Garcia-Baccino; Eduardo C G Pimentel; Sebastian Munilla; Andres Rogberg-Muñoz; Rodolfo J C Cantet; Christian Reimer; Ning Gao; Valentin Wimmer; Henner Simianer
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 4.297

Review 6.  Integrating High-Throughput Phenotyping and Statistical Genomic Methods to Genetically Improve Longitudinal Traits in Crops.

Authors:  Fabiana F Moreira; Hinayah R Oliveira; Jeffrey J Volenec; Katy M Rainey; Luiz F Brito
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Using Different Single-Step Strategies to Improve the Efficiency of Genomic Prediction on Body Measurement Traits in Pig.

Authors:  Hailiang Song; Jinxin Zhang; Qin Zhang; Xiangdong Ding
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Application of single-step genomic evaluation using social genetic effect model for growth in pig.

Authors:  Joon Ki Hong; Young Sin Kim; Kyu Ho Cho; Deuk Hwan Lee; Ye Jin Min; Eun Seok Cho
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.509

9.  Genetic analysis of egg production traits in turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) using a single-step genomic random regression model.

Authors:  Hakimeh Emamgholi Begli; Lawrence R Schaeffer; Emhimad Abdalla; Emmanuel A Lozada-Soto; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek; Benjamin J Wood; Christine F Baes
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Genetic Parameter Estimation and Genomic Prediction of Duroc Boars' Sperm Morphology Abnormalities.

Authors:  Yunxiang Zhao; Ning Gao; Jian Cheng; Saeed El-Ashram; Lin Zhu; Conglin Zhang; Zhili Li
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.