Literature DB >> 25658476

Low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer in a clinical setting: essential elements of a screening program.

Brady J McKee1, Andrea B McKee, Andrea Borondy Kitts, Shawn M Regis, Christoph Wald.   

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to review clinical computed tomography (CT) lung screening program elements essential to safely and effectively manage the millions of Americans at high risk for lung cancer expected to enroll in lung cancer screening programs over the next 3 to 5 years. To optimize the potential net benefit of CT lung screening and facilitate medical audits benchmarked to national quality standards, radiologists should interpret these examinations using a validated structured reporting system such as Lung-RADS. Patient and physician educational outreach should be enacted to support an informed and shared decision-making process without creating barriers to screening access. Programs must integrate smoking cessation interventions to maximize the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of screening. At an institutional level, budgets should account for the necessary expense of hiring and/or training qualified support staff and equipping them with information technology resources adequate to enroll and track patients accurately over decades of future screening evaluation. At a national level, planning should begin on ways to accommodate the upcoming increased demand for physician services in fields critical to the success of CT lung screening such as diagnostic radiology and thoracic surgery. Institutions with programs that follow these specifications will be well equipped to meet the significant oncoming demand for CT lung screening services and bestow clinical benefits on their patients equal to or beyond what was observed in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25658476     DOI: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Imaging        ISSN: 0883-5993            Impact factor:   3.000


  9 in total

1.  Controlled settings for lung cancer screening: why do they matter? Considerations for referring clinicians.

Authors:  A Bharmal; A Crosskill; S Lam; H Bryant
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Implementing lung cancer screening in the real world: opportunity, challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Robert J Optican; Caroline Chiles
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

Review 3.  Risk factors assessment and risk prediction models in lung cancer screening candidates.

Authors:  Mariusz Adamek; Ewa Wachuła; Sylwia Szabłowska-Siwik; Agnieszka Boratyn-Nowicka; Damian Czyżewski
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04

4.  Automatic Lung-RADS™ classification with a natural language processing system.

Authors:  Sebastian E Beyer; Brady J McKee; Shawn M Regis; Andrea B McKee; Sebastian Flacke; Gilan El Saadawi; Christoph Wald
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Qualitative coronary artery calcium assessment on CT lung screening exam helps predict first cardiac events.

Authors:  Katherine B Malcolm; Danya L Dinwoodey; Michael C Cundiff; Shawn M Regis; Andrea K Borondy Kitts; Christoph Wald; Miranda L Lynch; Wael Al-Husami; Andrea B McKee; Brady J McKee
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  National Lung Cancer Screening Utilization Trends in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Jennifer A Lewis; Lauren R Samuels; Jason Denton; Gretchen C Edwards; Michael E Matheny; Amelia Maiga; Christopher G Slatore; Eric Grogan; Jane Kim; Robert H Sherrier; Robert S Dittus; Pierre P Massion; Laura Keohane; Sayeh Nikpay; Christianne L Roumie
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2020-06-13

7.  Organizational Readiness for Lung Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

Authors:  Lucy B Spalluto; Jennifer A Lewis; Deonni Stolldorf; Vivian M Yeh; Carol Callaway-Lane; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Christopher G Slatore; David F Yankelevitz; Claudia I Henschke; Timothy J Vogus; Pierre P Massion; Drew Moghanaki; Christianne L Roumie
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 6.240

8.  Outcomes of Positive and Suspicious Findings in Clinical Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening and the Road Ahead.

Authors:  Shawn M Regis; Andrea Borondy-Kitts; Andrea B McKee; Kimberly Rieger-Christ; Jacob Sands; Jalil Afnan; Brady J McKee
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2022-08

9.  Association of a Lung Screening Program Coordinator With Adherence to Annual CT Lung Screening at a Large Academic Institution.

Authors:  Lucy B Spalluto; Jennifer A Lewis; Sageline LaBaze; Kim L Sandler; Alexis B Paulson; Carol Callaway-Lane; Eric L Grogan; Pierre P Massion; Christianne L Roumie
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 5.532

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.