| Literature DB >> 25657614 |
Hadia M Abdelaal1, Hyeon O Kim2, Reece Wagstaff2, Ryoko Sawahata2, Peter J Southern3, Pamela J Skinner2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: For decades, the Vibratome served as a standard laboratory resource for sectioning fresh and fixed tissues. In skilled hands, high quality and consistent fresh unfixed tissue sections can be produced using a Vibratome but the sectioning procedure is extremely time consuming. In this study, we conducted a systematic comparison between the Vibratome and a new approach to section fresh unfixed tissues using a Compresstome. We used a Vibratome and a Compresstome to cut fresh unfixed lymphoid and genital non-human primate tissues then used in situ tetramer staining to label virus-specific CD8 T cells and immunofluorescent counter-staining to label B and T cells. We compared the Vibratome and Compresstome in five different sectioning parameters: speed of cutting, chilling capability, specimen stabilization, size of section, and section/staining quality.Entities:
Keywords: Cervix; Compresstome; Immunohistochemistry; Lymph node; Spleen; Unfixed fresh tissue sectioning; Uterus; Vagina; Vibratome; in situ tetramer staining
Year: 2015 PMID: 25657614 PMCID: PMC4318225 DOI: 10.1186/s12575-014-0012-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Proced Online ISSN: 1480-9222 Impact factor: 3.244
Figure 1Fresh tissue sectioning using a Compresstome and a Vibratome. Cutting and chilling of fresh tissue with a Compresstome (A-B) and a Vibratome (C-D).
Comparison between the Compresstome VF-300 and the Vibratome 3000
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| Presence of light source | No | Yes |
| Construction | Flimsy | Solid |
| Cutting speed | Fast ~5 sections/minute | Slow ~0.8 sections/minute |
| Number of blocks that can be cut at the same time | One | Four |
| Chilling capability | Frozen buffer cubes added to the buffer tank | Dry ice or ice placed in the outer chamber |
| Sectioning difficulties due to blade dislodging embedded tissue | Rare | Frequent |
| Maximum section size | ~0.64 cm2 | ~0.25 cm2 |
Figure 2Comparison of fresh lymphoid tissue sections cut with a Compresstome or Vibratome. Fresh unfixed lymph node (A-B) and spleen (C-D) tissue sections were generated with either a Compresstome (left panels) or Vibratome (right panels) and processed for in situ tetramer staining combined with immunohistochemistry. Tissue sections were stained with Mamu-A1/Gag (CM9) MHC-tetramers to label SIV-specific CD8 T cells (red to pinkish color), anti-CD20 antibodies to detect B cells (green), and anti-CD3 antibodies to detect T cells (Blue). Confocal mages were collected using a 20 X objective and 3 um z-steps. The upper left panel of each image shows a montage of several projected confocal z-series fields. Scale bars = 100 microns. We used the curves tool in Photoshop to increase the contrast of each image, and each image was adjusted similarly.
Figure 3Comparison of fresh genital tissue sections cut with a Compresstome or Vibratome. Fresh vagina (A-B), cervix (C-D) and uterus (E-F) tissue sections generated with either a Compresstome (left panels) or Vibratome (right panels) and processed for in situ tetramer staining combined with immunohistochemistry. Tissue sections were stained with Mamu-A1/Gag (CM9) MHC-tetramers to label SIV-specific CD8 T cells (red to pinkish color), anti-CD20 antibodies to detect B cells (green), and anti-CD3 antibodies to detect T cells (Blue). Confocal mages were collected using a 20 X objective and 3 um z-steps. The upper left panel of each image shows montage of several projected confocal z-series fields. Scale bars = 100 microns. We used the curves tool in Photoshop to increase contrast of each image, and each image was adjusted similarly.