Literature DB >> 25656749

Use of the theoretical domains framework to further understanding of what influences application of fluoride varnish to children's teeth: a national survey of general dental practitioners in Scotland.

Wendy Gnich1, Debbie Bonetti, Andrea Sherriff, Shilpi Sharma, David I Conway, Lorna M D Macpherson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Despite recent improvements in the oral health of Scotland's population, the persistence of childhood dental caries underscores a need to reduce the disease burden experienced by children living in Scotland. Application of fluoride varnish (FV) to children's teeth provides an evidence-based approach to achieving this goal. Despite policy, health service targets and professional recommendations supporting application, not all children receive FV in line with guidance. The objective of this study was to use the theoretical domains framework (TDF) to further an understanding of what may influence fluoride varnish application (FVA) in General Dental Practice in Scotland.
METHODS: A postal questionnaire assessing current behaviour (frequency of FVA) and theoretical domains (TDs) was sent to all General Dental Practitioners (GDPs) in Scotland. Correlations and linear regression models were used to examine the association between FVA and the TDs.
RESULTS: One thousand and ninety (53.6%) eligible GDPs responded. Respondents reported applying FV more frequently to increased risk and younger children (aged 2-5 years). Higher scores in eight TDs (Knowledge, Social/professional role and identity, Beliefs about consequences, Motivation and goals, Environmental context and resources, Social influences, Emotion and Behavioural regulation) were associated with greater frequency of FVA. Four beliefs in particular appear to be driving GDPs' decision to apply FV (recognizing that FVA is a guideline recommended behaviour (Knowledge), that FVA is perceived as an important part of the GDPs' professional role (Professional role/identity), that FV is something parents want for their children (Social influences) and that FV is something GDPs really wanted to do (Emotion).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study support the use of the TDF as a tool to understand GDPs application of FV and suggest that a multifaceted intervention, targeting dental professionals and families, and more specifically those domains and items associated with FVA may have the greatest likelihood of influencing the evidence-based behaviour.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Childsmile; Scotland; behaviour change; dental caries; evidence-based dentistry; evidence-based practice; fluoride varnish; oral health; theoretical domains framework; theory-based intervention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25656749     DOI: 10.1111/cdoe.12151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol        ISSN: 0301-5661            Impact factor:   3.383


  10 in total

Review 1.  Learning from good practice: a review of current oral health promotion materials for parents of young children.

Authors:  K A Gray-Burrows; J Owen; P F Day
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Fissure seal or fluoride varnish?

Authors:  Christopher Deery
Journal:  Evid Based Dent       Date:  2016-09

3.  Parents' Experiences of Toothbrushing with Children: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Z Marshman; S M Ahern; R R C McEachan; H J Rogers; K A Gray-Burrows; P F Day
Journal:  JDR Clin Trans Res       Date:  2016-04-26

4.  Patient-, organization-, and system-level barriers and facilitators to preventive oral health care: a convergent mixed-methods study in primary dental care.

Authors:  Anna Rose Templeton; Linda Young; Alison Bish; Wendy Gnich; Heather Cassie; Shaun Treweek; Debbie Bonetti; Douglas Stirling; Lorna Macpherson; Sharon McCann; Jan Clarkson; Craig Ramsay
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  A systems approach using the functional resonance analysis method to support fluoride varnish application for children attending general dental practice.

Authors:  Al Ross; Andrea Sherriff; Jamie Kidd; Wendy Gnich; Janet Anderson; Leigh Deas; Lorna Macpherson
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 3.661

6.  To fill or not to fill: a qualitative cross-country study on dentists' decisions in managing non-cavitated proximal caries lesions.

Authors:  F Schwendicke; L A Foster Page; L A Smith; M Fontana; W M Thomson; S R Baker
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Whose Responsibility Is It Anyway? Exploring Barriers to Prevention of Oral Diseases across Europe.

Authors:  H Leggett; J Csikar; K Vinall-Collier; G V A Douglas
Journal:  JDR Clin Trans Res       Date:  2020-05-21

8.  Important aspects of conducting an interdisciplinary public preventive oral health project for children in areas with low socioeconomic status: staff perspective.

Authors:  C Blomma; B Krevers
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 9.  Adopting the COM-B model and TDF framework in oral and dental research: A narrative review.

Authors:  Heather Buchanan; Jonathon Timothy Newton; Sarah R Baker; Koula Asimakopoulou
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.489

10.  The effect of introducing a financial incentive to promote application of fluoride varnish in dental practice in Scotland: a natural experiment.

Authors:  Wendy Gnich; Andrea Sherriff; Debbie Bonetti; David I Conway; Lorna M D Macpherson
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 7.327

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.