| Literature DB >> 25656484 |
Florian Bönner1, Niko Janzarik, Christoph Jacoby, Maximilian Spieker, Bernhard Schnackenburg, Felix Range, Britta Butzbach, Sebastian Haberkorn, Ralf Westenfeld, Mirja Neizel-Wittke, Ulrich Flögel, Malte Kelm.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: T2 mapping indicates to be a sensitive method for detection of tissue oedema hidden beyond the detection limits of T2-weighted Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR). However, due to variability of baseline T2 values in volunteers, reference values need to be defined. Therefore, the aim of the study was to investigate the effects of age and sex on quantitative T2 mapping with a turbo gradient-spin-echo (GRASE) sequence at 1.5 T. For that reason, we studied sensitivity issues as well as technical and biological effects on GRASE-derived myocardial T2 maps. Furthermore, intra- and interobserver variability were calculated using data from a large volunteer group.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25656484 PMCID: PMC4318191 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-015-0118-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson ISSN: 1097-6647 Impact factor: 5.364
Volunteer characteristics
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
| Age (Y) | 27.5 ± 7.4 | 63.8 ± 9.9 | <0.01 |
| Female | 35.6% | 39% | n.s. |
| Cardiovascular risk factors | |||
| Hyoertension | 2.6% | 63.6% | <0.01 |
| Diabetes | 0% | 12% | <0.01 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 5.1% | 39.4% | <0.01 |
| Current smokers | 20.5% | 15.6% | <0.05 |
| Presentation characteristics | |||
| Recent infection | 0% | 0% | n.s. |
| TnT (pg/ml) | <14 | <14 | n.s. |
| ECG abnormalities | 0% | 0% | n.s. |
| NYHA class | n.a. | n.a. | n.s. |
| cMRI parameters | |||
| Myocardial weight index (Heart mass/body surface area; g/m2) | 62.2 ± 16.4 | 61.9 ± 17.2 | n.s. |
| Ejection fraction (%) | 62.8 ± 11.4 | 66.7 ± 10.2 | n.s. |
| LGE | no | no | n.s. |
| T2w MRI | no | no | n.s. |
Figure 1Principle of T2 map calculation. (A) Example of 6 GRASE-derived echo images with echo times given in the figures. Note, there is only very little cardiac motion between 10 and 150 ms. (B) An exponential fit was performed for each image pixel (exemplarily for the blue circle in the anterior wall of A) with amplitude (h) and damping (1/T2) as fit parameters (fixed bias, y0). T2 value calculation in myocardial tissue was performed for 5, 10 and 15 echoes with 10 ms interecho time. T2 maps are illustrated by a colour-coded map, assigning 0 ms to black and 150 ms to red.
Figure 2GRASE-derived T2 values show low inter- and intra-observer variability. (A) Interobserver variability for global median myocardial T2 values in volunteers for two experienced observers given in a scatter plot. The coefficient of variation was 2.2%. (B) Bland-Altman plot with limits of agreement in blue (1.96 × standard deviation). (C) Intra-observer variability for global median myocardial T2 values between 2 measurements. The coefficient of variation was 2.9%. (D) Bland-Altman plot with limits of agreement in blue (1.96 × standard deviation).
Figure 3Myocardial T2 values acquired are dependent on slice region, sex, and age in volunteers. (A) Three myocardial short axis slices were acquired for analysis of median T2 time (B) Median T2 values of young volunteers as defined in Table 1 in apical, midventricular, and basal short axis slices. Male volunteers are indicated in black and female in grey. (C) The same analysis was performed for older volunteers as defined in Table 1. Values are given as mean ± SD. * = p < 0.01, male compared to female in the same short axis slice and between apical and basal short axis slices within the same sex.
Figure 4Age correlates with global median T2 time in absence of known cardiovascular disease. (A) Typical examples of two volunteers of different age (25 and 75 years) receiving T2 mapping and Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE). While there is no sign of a structural heart disease (LGE), T2 maps display differences in distribution of myocardial T2 values already upon visual inspection. Note the increased pericardial fat in the older volunteer (arrow). (B) Mean global T2 values increase with age (R = 0.77 with n = 69).
Figure 5GRASE-derived T2 values are not influenced by local myocardial strain or heart rate in volunteers. Regression analysis of segmental T2 values and segmental strain in male (black) and female (grey) volunteers. No correlation was found between (A) peak systolic strain (%) or (B) peak diastolic strain (%) with mean T2 values (R < 0.1 for each sex and strain analysis). No correlation was also found between heart rate and global T2 time (C).
Figure 6Early diastolic strain rate is diminished in older volunteers. Both groups of volunteers were analysed with respect to early diastolic strain rate (Ecc/sec) which showed significantly diminished values in older volunteers. Values are mean standard deviation. * p > 0.01.