Tsugumi Takayama1, Yuji Okura2, Yoshinobu Okada3, Keiichi Honma4, Atsushi Nashimoto5, Nobuaki Sato6, Akira Yokoyama7, Tohru Minamino8. 1. Department of Cardiology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Chu-o-ku Kawagishicho 2-15-3, Niigata, 951-8560, Japan. 2. Department of Cardiology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Chu-o-ku Kawagishicho 2-15-3, Niigata, 951-8560, Japan. okuray@niigata-cc.jp. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, Kamo Hospital, Niigata, Japan. 4. Department of Pathology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan. 5. Department of Digestive Surgery, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan. 6. Department of Breast Surgery, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan. 7. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan. 8. Department of Cardiovascular Biology and Medicine, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neoplastic cardiac tamponade (NCT) is a life-threatening complication of cancer. The interval between cancer diagnosis and NCT onset and the prognosis after pericardiocentesis may differ according to cancer type. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective study of 113 patients (54 % male) with NCT who underwent pericardiocentesis at Niigata Cancer Center Hospital between 1992 and 2013. Mean age at NCT was 61.2 years (range 15.9-94.8 years). The most common underlying cancers were lung cancer (59.2 %), breast cancer (21.2 %), lymphoma/leukemia (5.3 %), and gastric/esophageal cancer (5.3 %). The median time from cancer diagnosis to NCT onset was 9.0, 60.4, 5.6, and 8.0 months for lung cancer, breast cancer, lymphoma/leukemia, and gastric/esophageal cancer, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were worse for breast cancer patients with NCT than for matched breast cancer patients without NCT (P < 0.0001). Median survival time after pericardiocentesis was 2.9, 4.2, 2.3, and 0.6 months for lung cancer, breast cancer, lymphoma/leukemia, and gastric/esophageal cancer, respectively; one-year survival after pericardiocentesis was 6.0, 16.7, 33.3, and 0 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The interval between cancer diagnosis and NCT onset, the impact of NCT on prognosis, and the prognosis after pericardiocentesis differed according to cancer type. Healthcare practitioners caring for patients with NCT should recognize the differences between cancer types and customize their care accordingly.
BACKGROUND:Neoplastic cardiac tamponade (NCT) is a life-threatening complication of cancer. The interval between cancer diagnosis and NCT onset and the prognosis after pericardiocentesis may differ according to cancer type. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective study of 113 patients (54 % male) with NCT who underwent pericardiocentesis at Niigata Cancer Center Hospital between 1992 and 2013. Mean age at NCT was 61.2 years (range 15.9-94.8 years). The most common underlying cancers were lung cancer (59.2 %), breast cancer (21.2 %), lymphoma/leukemia (5.3 %), and gastric/esophageal cancer (5.3 %). The median time from cancer diagnosis to NCT onset was 9.0, 60.4, 5.6, and 8.0 months for lung cancer, breast cancer, lymphoma/leukemia, and gastric/esophageal cancer, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were worse for breast cancerpatients with NCT than for matched breast cancerpatients without NCT (P < 0.0001). Median survival time after pericardiocentesis was 2.9, 4.2, 2.3, and 0.6 months for lung cancer, breast cancer, lymphoma/leukemia, and gastric/esophageal cancer, respectively; one-year survival after pericardiocentesis was 6.0, 16.7, 33.3, and 0 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The interval between cancer diagnosis and NCT onset, the impact of NCT on prognosis, and the prognosis after pericardiocentesis differed according to cancer type. Healthcare practitioners caring for patients with NCT should recognize the differences between cancer types and customize their care accordingly.
Authors: J Guillermo Paez; Pasi A Jänne; Jeffrey C Lee; Sean Tracy; Heidi Greulich; Stacey Gabriel; Paula Herman; Frederic J Kaye; Neal Lindeman; Titus J Boggon; Katsuhiko Naoki; Hidefumi Sasaki; Yoshitaka Fujii; Michael J Eck; William R Sellers; Bruce E Johnson; Matthew Meyerson Journal: Science Date: 2004-04-29 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Thomas J Lynch; Daphne W Bell; Raffaella Sordella; Sarada Gurubhagavatula; Ross A Okimoto; Brian W Brannigan; Patricia L Harris; Sara M Haserlat; Jeffrey G Supko; Frank G Haluska; David N Louis; David C Christiani; Jeff Settleman; Daniel A Haber Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-04-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Shaheenah Dawood; Kristine Broglio; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Aman U Buzdar; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Sharon H Giordano Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-08-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Thomas J Smith; Sarah Temin; Erin R Alesi; Amy P Abernethy; Tracy A Balboni; Ethan M Basch; Betty R Ferrell; Matt Loscalzo; Diane E Meier; Judith A Paice; Jeffrey M Peppercorn; Mark Somerfield; Ellen Stovall; Jamie H Von Roenn Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-02-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: H Kunitoh; T Tamura; T Shibata; M Imai; Y Nishiwaki; M Nishio; A Yokoyama; K Watanabe; K Noda; N Saijo Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-01-20 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Casey M Chai; Kenneth Seier; Kay See Tan; Iris Chu; James M Isbell; Gregory W Fischer; Anoushka M Afonso Journal: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth Date: 2020-08-26 Impact factor: 2.628