Literature DB >> 25653434

Reduction of virion-associated σ1 fibers on oncolytic reovirus variants promotes adaptation toward tumorigenic cells.

Adil Mohamed1, Carmit Teicher1, Sarah Haefliger1, Maya Shmulevitz2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Wild-type mammalian orthoreovirus serotype 3 Dearing (T3wt) is nonpathogenic in humans but preferentially infects and kills cancer cells in culture and demonstrates promising antitumor activity in vivo. Using forward genetics, we previously isolated two variants of reovirus, T3v1 and T3v2, with increased infectivity toward a panel of cancer cell lines and improved in vivo oncolysis in a murine melanoma model relative to that of T3wt. Our current study explored how mutations in T3v1 and T3v2 promote infectivity. Reovirions contain trimers of σ1, the reovirus cell attachment protein, at icosahedral capsid vertices. Quantitative Western blot analysis showed that purified T3v1 and T3v2 virions had ∼ 2- and 4-fold-lower levels of σ1 fiber than did T3wt virions. Importantly, using RNA interference to reduce σ1 levels during T3wt production, we were able to generate wild-type reovirus with reduced levels of σ1 per virion. As σ1 levels were reduced, virion infectivity increased by 2- to 5-fold per cell-bound particle, demonstrating a causal relationship between virion σ1 levels and the infectivity of incoming virions. During infection of tumorigenic L929 cells, T3wt, T3v1, and T3v2 uncoated the outer capsid proteins σ3 and μ1C at similar rates. However, having started with fewer σ1 molecules, a complete loss of σ1 was achieved sooner for T3v1 and T3v2. Distinct from intracellular uncoating, chymotrypsin digestion, as a mimic of natural enteric infection, resulted in more rapid σ3 and μ1C removal, unique disassembly intermediates, and a rapid loss of infectivity for T3v1 and T3v2 compared to T3wt. Optimal infectivity toward natural versus therapeutic niches may therefore require distinct reovirus structures and σ1 levels. IMPORTANCE: Wild-type reovirus is currently in clinical trials as a potential cancer therapy. Our molecular studies on variants of reovirus with enhanced oncolytic activity in vitro and in vivo now show that distinct reovirus structures promote adaptation toward cancer cells and away from conditions that mimic natural routes of infection. Specifically, we found that reovirus particles with fewer molecules of the cell attachment protein σ1 became more infectious toward transformed cells. Reduced σ1 levels conferred a benefit to incoming particles only, resulting in an earlier depletion of σ1 and a higher probability of establishing productive infection. Conversely, reovirus variants with fewer σ1 molecules showed reduced stability and infectivity and distinct disassembly when exposed to conditions that mimic natural intestinal proteolysis. These findings support a model where the mode of infection dictates the precise optimum of reovirus structure and provide a molecular rationale for considering alternative reovirus structures during oncolytic therapy.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25653434      PMCID: PMC4442378          DOI: 10.1128/JVI.03651-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol        ISSN: 0022-538X            Impact factor:   5.103


  71 in total

1.  Conformational changes accompany activation of reovirus RNA-dependent RNA transcription.

Authors:  Israel I Mendez; Scott G Weiner; Yi-Min She; Mark Yeager; Kevin M Coombs
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 2.867

2.  Reovirus serotype 1 intestinal infection: a novel replicative cycle with ileal disease.

Authors:  D H Rubin; M J Kornstein; A O Anderson
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Polypeptide components of virions, top component and cores of reovirus type 3.

Authors:  R E Smith; H J Zweerink; W K Joklik
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 3.616

4.  Transcription in vitro by reovirus-associated ribonucleic acid-dependent polymerase.

Authors:  A K Banerjee; A J Shatkin
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Sensitization to apoptosis underlies KrasD12-dependent oncolysis of murine C26 colorectal carcinoma cells by reovirus T3D.

Authors:  Niels Smakman; Diana J M van den Wollenberg; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Rob C Hoeben; Onno Kranenburg
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Ras transformation mediates reovirus oncolysis by enhancing virus uncoating, particle infectivity, and apoptosis-dependent release.

Authors:  Paola Marcato; Maya Shmulevitz; Da Pan; Don Stoltz; Patrick Wk Lee
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 11.454

7.  Cathepsin S supports acid-independent infection by some reoviruses.

Authors:  Joseph W Golden; Jessica A Bahe; William T Lucas; Max L Nibert; Leslie A Schiff
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Characterization of the adaptive and innate immune response to intravenous oncolytic reovirus (Dearing type 3) during a phase I clinical trial.

Authors:  C L White; K R Twigger; L Vidal; J S De Bono; M Coffey; L Heinemann; R Morgan; A Merrick; F Errington; R G Vile; A A Melcher; H S Pandha; K J Harrington
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 5.250

9.  A phase I trial of intratumoral administration of reovirus in patients with histologically confirmed recurrent malignant gliomas.

Authors:  Peter Forsyth; Gloria Roldán; David George; Carla Wallace; Cheryl Ann Palmer; Don Morris; Gregory Cairncross; Maureen Vallee Matthews; James Markert; Yancey Gillespie; Matt Coffey; Brad Thompson; Mark Hamilton
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 11.454

10.  Proteolytic disassembly is a critical determinant for reovirus oncolysis.

Authors:  Tommy Alain; Tom Sy Kim; Xueqing Lun; Adelhamid Liacini; Leslie A Schiff; Donna L Senger; Peter A Forsyth
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 11.454

View more
  14 in total

1.  Breast Tumor-Associated Metalloproteases Restrict Reovirus Oncolysis by Cleaving the σ1 Cell Attachment Protein and Can Be Overcome by Mutation of σ1.

Authors:  Jason P Fernandes; Francisca Cristi; Heather E Eaton; Patricia Chen; Sarah Haeflinger; Isabelle Bernard; Mary M Hitt; Maya Shmulevitz
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Protein Mismatches Caused by Reassortment Influence Functions of the Reovirus Capsid.

Authors:  Deepti Thete; Pranav Danthi
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Polymorphisms in the Most Oncolytic Reovirus Strain Confer Enhanced Cell Attachment, Transcription, and Single-Step Replication Kinetics.

Authors:  Adil Mohamed; James R Smiley; Maya Shmulevitz
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  African Swine Fever Virus NP868R Capping Enzyme Promotes Reovirus Rescue during Reverse Genetics by Promoting Reovirus Protein Expression, Virion Assembly, and RNA Incorporation into Infectious Virions.

Authors:  Heather E Eaton; Takeshi Kobayashi; Terence S Dermody; Randal N Johnston; Philippe H Jais; Maya Shmulevitz
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  The reovirus μ2 C-terminal loop inversely regulates NTPase and transcription functions versus binding to factory-forming μNS and promotes replication in tumorigenic cells.

Authors:  Wan Kong Wynton Yip; Francisca Cristi; Georgi Trifonov; Nashae Narayan; Mark Kubanski; Maya Shmulevitz
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Single Amino Acid Differences between Closely Related Reovirus T3D Lab Strains Alter Oncolytic Potency In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Adil Mohamed; Derek R Clements; Shashi A Gujar; Patrick W Lee; James R Smiley; Maya Shmulevitz
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Reovirus μ1 Protein Affects Infectivity by Altering Virus-Receptor Interactions.

Authors:  Deepti Thete; Anthony J Snyder; Bernardo A Mainou; Pranav Danthi
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Structural and Functional Features of the Reovirus σ1 Tail.

Authors:  Melanie H Dietrich; Kristen M Ogden; Jacob M Long; Rebecca Ebenhoch; Alexandra Thor; Terence S Dermody; Thilo Stehle
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Novel High-throughput Approach for Purification of Infectious Virions.

Authors:  Kevin T James; Brad Cooney; Kate Agopsowicz; Mary Ann Trevors; Adil Mohamed; Don Stoltz; Mary Hitt; Maya Shmulevitz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Potential for Improving Potency and Specificity of Reovirus Oncolysis with Next-Generation Reovirus Variants.

Authors:  Adil Mohamed; Randal N Johnston; Maya Shmulevitz
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 5.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.