Literature DB >> 31776267

Polymorphisms in the Most Oncolytic Reovirus Strain Confer Enhanced Cell Attachment, Transcription, and Single-Step Replication Kinetics.

Adil Mohamed1, James R Smiley1, Maya Shmulevitz2.   

Abstract

Reovirus serotype 3 Dearing (T3D) replicates preferentially in transformed cells and is in clinical trials as a cancer therapy. Laboratory strains of T3D, however, exhibit differences in plaque size on cancer cells and differences in oncolytic activity in vivo This study aimed to determine why the most oncolytic T3D reovirus lab strain, the Patrick Lee laboratory strain (T3DPL), replicates more efficiently in cancer cells than other commonly used laboratory strains, the Kevin Coombs laboratory strain (T3DKC) and Terence Dermody laboratory (T3DTD) strain. In single-step growth curves, T3DPL titers increased at higher rates and produced ∼9-fold higher burst size. Furthermore, the number of reovirus antigen-positive cells increased more rapidly for T3DPL than for T3DTD In conclusion, the most oncolytic T3DPL possesses replication advantages in a single round of infection. Two specific mechanisms for enhanced infection by T3DPL were identified. First, T3DPL exhibited higher cell attachment, which was attributed to a higher proportion of virus particles with insufficient (≤3) σ1 cell attachment proteins. Second, T3DPL transcribed RNA at rates superior to those of the less oncolytic T3D strains, which is attributed to polymorphisms in M1-encoding μ2 protein, as confirmed in an in vitro transcription assay, and which thus demonstrates that T3DPL has an inherent transcription advantage that is cell type independent. Accordingly, T3DPL established rapid onset of viral RNA and protein synthesis, leading to more rapid kinetics of progeny virus production, larger virus burst size, and higher levels of cell death. Together, these results emphasize the importance of paying close attention to genomic divergence between virus laboratory strains and, mechanistically, reveal the importance of the rapid onset of infection for reovirus oncolysis.IMPORTANCE Reovirus serotype 3 Dearing (T3D) is in clinical trials for cancer therapy. Recently, it was discovered that highly related laboratory strains of T3D exhibit large differences in their abilities to replicate in cancer cells in vitro, which correlates with oncolytic activity in a murine model of melanoma. The current study reveals two mechanisms for the enhanced efficiency of T3DPL in cancer cells. Due to polymorphisms in two viral genes, within the first round of reovirus infection, T3DPL binds to cells more efficiency and more rapidly produces viral RNAs; this increased rate of infection relative to that of the less oncolytic strains gives T3DPL a strong inherent advantage that culminates in higher virus production, more cell death, and higher virus spread.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  T3D; attachment; genetic polymorphisms; oncolysis; reovirus; strain diversity; transcription; μ2; σ1

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31776267      PMCID: PMC6997772          DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01937-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol        ISSN: 0022-538X            Impact factor:   5.103


  52 in total

1.  Exploring host factors that impact reovirus replication, dissemination, and reovirus-induced cell death in cancer versus normal cells in culture.

Authors:  Maya Shmulevitz; Patrick W K Lee
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

2.  Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering.

Authors:  F Corpet
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1988-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Junction adhesion molecule is a receptor for reovirus.

Authors:  E S Barton; J C Forrest; J L Connolly; J D Chappell; Y Liu; F J Schnell; A Nusrat; C A Parkos; T S Dermody
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-02-09       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Studies on the in vitro transcription of reovirus RNA catalyzed by reovirus cores.

Authors:  J J Skehel; W K Joklik
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 3.616

5.  Involvement of the interferon-regulated antiviral proteins PKR and RNase L in reovirus-induced shutoff of cellular translation.

Authors:  Jennifer A Smith; Stephen C Schmechel; Bryan R G Williams; Robert H Silverman; Leslie A Schiff
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Reovirus lambda 1 protein: affinity for double-stranded nucleic acids by a small amino-terminal region of the protein independent from the zinc finger motif.

Authors:  G Lemay; C Danis
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.891

7.  Reovirus mu2 protein inhibits interferon signaling through a novel mechanism involving nuclear accumulation of interferon regulatory factor 9.

Authors:  Jennifer Zurney; Takeshi Kobayashi; Geoffrey H Holm; Terence S Dermody; Barbara Sherry
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Reovirus therapy of tumors with activated Ras pathway.

Authors:  M C Coffey; J E Strong; P A Forsyth; P W Lee
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-11-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Junctional adhesion molecule-A is required for hematogenous dissemination of reovirus.

Authors:  Annukka A R Antar; Jennifer L Konopka; Jacquelyn A Campbell; Rachel A Henry; Ana L Perdigoto; Bruce D Carter; Ambra Pozzi; Ty W Abel; Terence S Dermody
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 21.023

10.  Dissection of mammalian orthoreovirus µ2 reveals a self-associative domain required for binding to microtubules but not to factory matrix protein µNS.

Authors:  Catherine Eichwald; Jonghwa Kim; Max L Nibert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Generation of Genetically RGD σ1-Modified Oncolytic Reovirus That Enhances JAM-A-Independent Infection of Tumor Cells.

Authors:  Takahiro Kawagishi; Yuta Kanai; Ryotaro Nouda; Ichika Fukui; Jeffery A Nurdin; Yoshiharu Matsuura; Takeshi Kobayashi
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  The reovirus μ2 C-terminal loop inversely regulates NTPase and transcription functions versus binding to factory-forming μNS and promotes replication in tumorigenic cells.

Authors:  Wan Kong Wynton Yip; Francisca Cristi; Georgi Trifonov; Nashae Narayan; Mark Kubanski; Maya Shmulevitz
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  The M2 Gene Is a Determinant of Reovirus-Induced Myocarditis.

Authors:  Marcelle Dina Zita; Matthew B Phillips; Johnasha D Stuart; Asangi R Kumarapeli; Anthony J Snyder; Amairani Paredes; Vijayalakshmi Sridharan; Marjan Boerma; Pranav Danthi; Karl W Boehme
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 6.549

Review 4.  Captivating Perplexities of Spinareovirinae 5' RNA Caps.

Authors:  Justine Kniert; Qi Feng Lin; Maya Shmulevitz
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 5.  Genetic Modifications That Expand Oncolytic Virus Potency.

Authors:  Francisca Cristi; Tomás Gutiérrez; Mary M Hitt; Maya Shmulevitz
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-01-26

6.  Reovirus uses temporospatial compartmentalization to orchestrate core versus outercapsid assembly.

Authors:  Justine Kniert; Theodore Dos Santos; Heather E Eaton; Woo Jung Cho; Greg Plummer; Maya Shmulevitz
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 7.464

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.