Literature DB >> 25653367

Disruption of activity in the ventral premotor but not the anterior intraparietal area interferes with on-line correction to a haptic perturbation during grasping.

Luis F Schettino1, Sergei V Adamovich2, Hamid Bagce3, Mathew Yarossi4, Eugene Tunik5.   

Abstract

Replanning ongoing movements following perturbations requires the accurate and immediate estimation of the motor response based on sensory input. Previous studies have used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in humans to demonstrate the participation of the anterior intraparietal sulcus (aIPS) and ventral premotor cortex (PMv) in visually mediated state estimation for grasping. Here, we test the role of parietofrontal circuits in processing the corrective responses to haptic perturbations of the finger during prehension. Subjects reached to grasp an object while having to compensate for a novel and unpredictable haptic perturbation of finger extension. TMS-based transient disruptions to the PMv and aIPS were delivered 0, 50, or 100 ms after the perturbation. TMS to the PMv delivered 50 ms after the perturbation (but not 0 or 100 ms, or in unperturbed trials) led to an overestimation of grasp aperture. No effects on grasp aperture were noted for the aIPS. Our results indicate that the PMv (but not aIPS) is involved in the deployment of the compensatory response in the presence of haptic perturbations during prehension. Our data also identify the time window of neural processing in the PMv when reprogramming occurs to be 50-100 ms following the perturbation onset.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/352112-06$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TMS; frontoparietal; grasping; haptic perturbation; on-line control; updating

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25653367      PMCID: PMC4315837          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3000-14.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  25 in total

1.  A parieto-premotor network for object manipulation: evidence from neuroimaging.

Authors:  F Binkofski; G Buccino; K M Stephan; G Rizzolatti; R J Seitz; H J Freund
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on functional brain activity: a combined event-related TMS and evoked potential study.

Authors:  G Thut; G Northoff; J R Ives; Y Kamitani; A Pfennig; F Kampmann; D L Schomer; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Virtual lesions of the anterior intraparietal area disrupt goal-dependent on-line adjustments of grasp.

Authors:  Eugene Tunik; Scott H Frey; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Ipsilateral cortical connections of dorsal and ventral premotor areas in New World owl monkeys.

Authors:  Iwona Stepniewska; Todd M Preuss; Jon H Kaas
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  The anterior intraparietal sulcus mediates grasp execution, independent of requirement to update: new insights from transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Nichola J Rice; Eugene Tunik; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Functional anatomy of pointing and grasping in humans.

Authors:  S T Grafton; A H Fagg; R P Woods; M A Arbib
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Delay in the execution of voluntary movement by electrical or magnetic brain stimulation in intact man. Evidence for the storage of motor programs in the brain.

Authors:  B L Day; J C Rothwell; P D Thompson; A Maertens de Noordhout; K Nakashima; K Shannon; C D Marsden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Programmed and triggered actions to rapid load changes during precision grip.

Authors:  R S Johansson; G Westling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. II. Area F5 and the control of distal movements.

Authors:  G Rizzolatti; R Camarda; L Fogassi; M Gentilucci; G Luppino; M Matelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Cortical topography of human anterior intraparietal cortex active during visually guided grasping.

Authors:  Scott H Frey; Deborah Vinton; Roger Norlund; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-22
View more
  3 in total

1.  Coordination of pincer grasp and transport after mechanical perturbation of the index finger.

Authors:  Luis F Schettino; Sergei V Adamovich; Eugene Tunik
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Dexterous Object Manipulation Requires Context-Dependent Sensorimotor Cortical Interactions in Humans.

Authors:  Pranav J Parikh; Justin M Fine; Marco Santello
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  The left ventral premotor cortex is involved in hand shaping for intransitive gestures: evidence from a two-person imitation experiment.

Authors:  Arran T Reader; Nicholas P Holmes
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.963

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.