| Literature DB >> 25652581 |
Mario Alberto Leyva-Peralta1, Ramón Enrique Robles-Zepeda2, Adriana Garibay-Escobar3, Eduardo Ruiz-Bustos4, Laura Patricia Alvarez-Berber5, Juan Carlos Gálvez-Ruiz6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Natural products have been regarded as important sources of potential chemotherapeutic agents. In this study, we evaluated the anti-proliferative activity of Argemone gracilenta's methanol extract and its fractions. We identified those compounds of the most active fractions that displayed anti-proliferative activity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25652581 PMCID: PMC4321710 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-015-0532-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Anti-proliferative activity (IC values) of the methanol extract and fractions of on selected cancer cell lines
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| M12.C3F6 | 46.20 ± 8.41ª | 20.40 ± 2.30c | 32.60 ± 1.10b | 21.08 ± 0.84c | 40.60 ± 10.08a |
| RAW 264.7 | 64.45 ± 8.97ª | 36.06 ± 6.55d | 41.27 ± 4.27c | 55.18 ± 8.80b | 64.65 ± 5.36ª |
| HeLa | 78.87 ± 8.52b | 70.62 ± 5.80c | 126.28 ± 5.73ª | > 200* | > 200* |
| L-929 | 160.60 ± 2.15b | 131.30 ± 3.39c | 180.61 ± 4.37ª | > 200* | > 200* |
Data are shown as the mean ± SD from three independent repeats after a 48-h exposure to the test extract and fractions. Significant differences (p < 0.05) are indicated by different letters (a-d). The asterisk (*) represents the maximum concentration tested that did not reach IC50 values.
Anti-proliferative activity (IC values) of the most active subfractions from the ethyl acetate fraction on selected cancer cell lines
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| M12.C3F6 | 16.81 ± 4.0b | 24.9 ± 2.2a | 2.8 ± 0.3c | 2.4 ± 0.4c |
| RAW 264.7 | 34.1 ± 5.8b | 35.4 ± 10.14b | 2.5 ± 0.5b | 2.7 ± 0.1b |
| HeLa | 91.8 ± 7.6a | 67.61 ± 5.6c | 12.1 ± 1.7d | 79.5 ± 11.5b |
| L-929 | 151.7 ± 1.5a | 85.1 ± 2.3b | > 100* | > 100* |
Data are shown as the mean ± SD from three independent repeats after a 48-h exposure to the test subfractions. Significant differences (p < 0.05) are indicated by different letters (a-d). The asterisk (*) represents the maximum concentration tested that did not reach IC50 values.
Figure 1Anti-proliferative activity of the Fag-7A (argemonine) fraction on cell lines. A) M12.C3F6 and B) HeLa, at a concentration of 50 μg/mL. Observation at 48 h in inverted microscope. Morphological changes: condensed nucleus (CN), apoptotic bodies (AB), autophagic vacuoles (AV), condensed cytoplasm (CC). All images are magnified at 40×. Images shown are representative of at least four such fields of view per sample and three independent trials.
Composition of Fag-4A and Fag-5B fractions (GC-MS)
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| FAg-4A | Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester | 18.62 | 33.39 |
| Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester | 19.28 | 14.98 | |
| 7-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester | 20.34 | 40.83 | |
| Linoleic acid ethyl ester | 20.95 | 10.78 | |
| FAg-5B | Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester | 18.62 | 1.01 |
| Hexadecanoic acid | 19.3 | 9.05 | |
| 7-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester | 20.31 | 8.39 | |
| 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid | 21.11 | 81.63 |
Figure 2Structure of the main component in Fag-7A fraction, argemonine: H NMR ( C NMR) data.
Figure 3Structure of the main component in Fag-7B fraction, berberine: H NMR ( C NMR) data.