| Literature DB >> 25652388 |
Ricardo C Ferreira1, Henry Z Simons, Whitney S Thompson, Antony J Cutler, Xaquin Castro Dopico, Deborah J Smyth, Meghavi Mashar, Helen Schuilenburg, Neil M Walker, David B Dunger, Chris Wallace, John A Todd, Linda S Wicker, Marcin L Pekalski.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Type 1 diabetes results from the autoimmune destruction of insulin-secreting pancreatic beta cells by T cells. Despite the established role of T cells in the pathogenesis of the disease, to date, with the exception of the identification of islet-specific T effector (Teff) cells, studies have mostly failed to identify reproducible alterations in the frequency or function of T cell subsets in peripheral blood from patients with type 1 diabetes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25652388 PMCID: PMC4351433 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-015-3509-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetologia ISSN: 0012-186X Impact factor: 10.122
Baseline characteristics of study participants
| Cohort |
| Age (years) | Male | Duration of disease (months) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | Range | Median | Range | |||
| Cytokine production in T1D patients and healthy controls (PBMCs) | ||||||
| T1D (D-GAP)a | 49 | 13 | 6–34 | 32 (65.3%) | 11 | 2–42 |
| T1D (CBR)b | 20 | 32 | 22–42 | 8 (40.0%) | 198 | 6–276 |
| T1D (combined) | 69 | 14 | 6–42 | 40 (58.0%) | 22 | 2–276 |
| Unaffected relatives (D-GAP) | 40 | 13 | 6–31 | 21 (52.5%) | N/A | N/A |
| Healthy controls (CBR) | 21 | 27 | 18–37 | 7 (33.3%) | N/A | N/A |
| Healthy controls (combined) | 61 | 15 | 6–37 | 28 (45.9%) | N/A | N/A |
| T follicular helper cell immunophenotyping (whole blood)c | ||||||
| T1D (CBR) | 30 | 32 | 22–47 | 9 (30.0%) | 204 | 24–240 |
| Healthy controls (CBR) | 32 | 32 | 17–52 | 9 (28.1%) | N/A | N/A |
Baseline characteristics for the study participants stratified by the study cohorts
aNewly diagnosed T1D patients (duration of disease ≤3 years) enrolled in the D-GAP study
bLong-standing adult type 1 diabetes patients enrolled from the CBR
cTwenty-three of the 62 CBR donors selected for Tfh cell immunophenotyping were also assessed for the cytokine production phenotypes
N/A, not applicable; T1D, type 1 diabetes
Antibodies and immunostaining panels used for flow cytometry
| Immunostaining panel | Antibody | Fluorochrome | Clone | Manufacturer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL-21 | CD4 | AF700 | RPA-T4 | BioLegend |
| CD25a | APC | M-A251 + 2A3 | BD Biosciences | |
| CD127 | PE-Cy7 | eBioRDR5 | eBioscience | |
| CD45RA | AF488 | HI100 | BioLegend | |
| IL-21 (IC) | PE | 3A3-N2 (MOPC-21) | BioLegend | |
| FOXP3 | PB | 259D | BioLegend | |
| Viability dye | eFluor780 | – | eBioscience | |
| IFN-γ/IL-17 | CD4 | AF700 | RPA-T4 | BioLegend |
| CD25a | APC | M-A251 + 2A3 | BD Biosciences | |
| CD127 | PE-Cy7 | eBioRDR5 | eBioscience | |
| CD45RA | BV785 | HI100 | BioLegend | |
| CCR6 | BV605 | G034E3 | BioLegend | |
| FOXP3 | PB | 259D | BioLegend | |
| HELIOS | FITC | 22F6 | BioLegend | |
| IFN-γ | PE | B27 | BD Biosciences | |
| IL-17 | PerCP Cy5.5 | BL168 | BioLegend | |
| Viability dye | eFluor780 | – | eBioscience | |
| Tfh cell immuno-phenotyping (whole blood) | PD-1 | PE | MIH4 | BD Biosciences |
| CD4 | AF700 | RPA-T4 | BioLegend | |
| CD45RA | PE-Cy7 | HI100 | BioLegend | |
| CD25a | APC | M-A251 + 2A3 | BD Biosciences | |
| CCR6 | AF488 | G034E3 | BioLegend | |
| CD3 | eFluor780 | SK7 | eBioscience |
Anti-human monoclonal antibodies used for the T-cell immunophenotyping
aTwo clones of anti-CD25 that bind to different epitopes were used simultaneously to enhance CD25 staining
AF, Alexa Fluor; APC, allophycocyanin; BV, Brilliant Violet; Cy, cyanine; IC, isotype control; PB, Pacific Blue; PE, phycoerythrin; PerCP, peridinin-chlorophyll proteins
Fig. 1IL-21 production is increased in type 1 diabetes patients. (a) Gating strategy for the delineation of IL-21+ CD45RA−, IFN-γ+ CD45RA− and IL-17+ CD45RA− CCR6+ CD4+ memory effector T cell subsets. (b) Scatter plot depicts the distribution (geometric mean ± 95% CI) of IL-21+ cells among memory CD45RA− CD4+ T cells. The frequency of IL-21+ cells was compared between 61 type 1 diabetes patients and 53 healthy donors (p = 3.9 × 10−3). (c, d) Scatter plots depict the frequency of IFN-γ+ (c) and IL-17+ (d) cells in a sample of 62 type 1 diabetes patients and 54 healthy donors following in vitro stimulation with 100 ng/ml PMA and ionomycin. (e, f) Frequency of IFN-γ+ (e) and IL-17+ (f) cells was also assessed in a subset of 24 type 1 diabetes patients and 15 healthy controls following in vitro stimulation with a higher concentration (500 ng/ml) of ionomycin. The p values were calculated by linear regression of the log-transformed data, including batch as a covariate. Horizontal bars represent the geometric mean (±95% CI) obtained from the transformation of the log-transformed data: (Y = exp[Y]) of each group. Additional data from the statistical analysis are provided in Table 3. HC, healthy control; T1D, type 1 diabetic patient. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
Association analysis of the peripheral CD4+ T-cell compartment with T1D
| Phenotype (gating strategy) |
| Healthy donors | Type 1 diabetes patients | % change (95% CI)a |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Mean frequency (95% CI) |
| Mean frequency (95% CI) | ||||
| Cytokine productionb | |||||||
IL-21+ memory T cells (% of CD4+) (CD4+ CD45RA− IL21−) | 114 | 53 | 4.88% (4.33, 5.50) | 61 | 5.92% (5.44, 6.44) | 21.9% (5.8, 40.2) | 3.9 × 10−3 |
IFN-γ+ memory T cells (% of CD4+) (CD4+ CD45RA− IFN-γ+) | 116 | 54 | 20.12% (17.52, 23.11) | 62 | 16.93% (14.67, 19.52) | −12.1% (−24.0, 1.7) | 0.07 |
IL-17+ CCR6+ memory T cells (% of CD4+) (CD4+ CD45RA− CCR6+ IL17+) | 66 | 29 | 3.61% (2.68, 4.86) | 37 | 4.26% (3.25, 5.58) | 28.7% (−0.7, 65.9) | 0.04 |
| CD4+ T follicular helper cell (Tfh) frequencyc | |||||||
Tfh (% of CD4+ CD45RA− CXCR5+) (PD-1+ CCR6−) | 62 | 32 | 26.02% (23.86, 28.15) | 30 | 29.89% (27.53, 32.25) | 14.9% (2.9, 26.9) | 0.016 |
The p values for the cytokine production phenotypes were calculated by linear regression, including batch as a covariate, comparing the mean frequency of the assessed cytokine production phenotypes in type 1 diabetes patients and healthy donors matched as closely as possible for age, sex and time of sample preparation
aPercent change and 95% CI of the respective T cell phenotype in type 1 diabetes patients relative to healthy donors
bStatistical tests for the cytokine production phenotypes were performed on log-transformed data because some phenotypes showed a strong right skew. Mean frequencies represent the geometric means obtained from the transformation (Y = exp[Y]) of the log-transformed data (natural log)
cThe p value for the Tfh cell immunophenotyping was calculated using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test
Fig. 2Frequency of IFN-γ+ HELIOS− CD45RA− FOXP3+ CD4+ Tregs is not altered in type 1 diabetes patients. (a) Gating strategy for the HELIOS− CD45RA− FOXP3+ CD4+ Treg subset. FACS gating plots depict data from one illustrative donor. (b) Scatter plot depicts the distribution (geometric mean ± 95% CI) of IFN-γ+ cells in the HELIOS−CD45RA− FOXP3+ CD4+ Treg subset. The frequency of IFN-γ+ cells was compared between type 1 diabetes patients (n = 62) and healthy donors (n = 54; p = 0.79). The p values were calculated by linear regression of the log-transformed data, including batch as a covariate. HC, healthy control; T1D, type 1 diabetic patient
Fig. 3Increased frequency of Tfh cells within the CXCR5+ CD4+ memory cell subset of type 1 diabetes patients as compared with healthy controls. (a) Gating strategy for the delineation the Tfh memory effector T cell subset defined as the frequency of PD-1+ CCR6− cells out of CD45RA− CXCR5+ CD4+ T cells. (b) Scatter plot depicts the distribution (geometric mean ± 95% CI) of Tfh cells (defined as % PD-1+ of CCR6− CXCR5+) in a cohort of type 1 diabetes patients (n = 30) and healthy controls (n = 32; p = 0.016). Frequency of circulating Tfh cells was assessed using fresh whole blood from type 1 diabetes patients and healthy donors enrolled from the CBR, matched for sex and 5 year age bands. The p value was calculated using an unpaired two-tailed t test. HC, healthy control; T1D, type 1 diabetic patient. *p < 0.05