| Literature DB >> 25652134 |
Bin-Bin Xie1,2,3, Dan Li4,5, Wei-Ling Shi6,7, Qi-Long Qin8,9,10, Xiao-Wei Wang11,12, Jin-Cheng Rong13,14, Cai-Yun Sun15,16, Feng Huang17, Xi-Ying Zhang18,19,20, Xiao-Wei Dong21, Xiu-Lan Chen22,23,24, Bai-Cheng Zhou25, Yu-Zhong Zhang26,27,28, Xiao-Yan Song29,30,31.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alternative splicing is crucial for proteome diversity and functional complexity in higher organisms. However, the alternative splicing landscape in fungi is still elusive.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25652134 PMCID: PMC4324775 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-1251-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Figure 1Statistics of RNA-Seq. (A) Mapping of RNA-Seq reads to the reference genome. (B) Venn diagrams of transcript units (TUs) predicted from PDB library, MSM library, and pooled PDB + MSM libraries. (C) Comparison of PDB + MSM TUs with fggw set of gene models. (D and E) Length distribution of new gene models (D) and new proteins (E) predicted based on RNA-Seq.
Figure 2Comparison of numbers of genes transcribed in different media. (A) All genes. (B) Glycoside hydrolases (GH). (C) Glycosyltransferases (GT). (D) Carbohydrate esterases (CE). (E) Polysaccharide lyases (PL). (F) Chitinases. (G) β-1,3/1,6-glucanses. Numbers were presented as numbers of β-1,3-glucanses / numbers of β-1,6-glucanses. (H) Cellulolytic enzymes. (I) Hemicellulolytic enzymes. (J) Non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS) and/or polyketide synthases (PKS). “P” indicates genes transcribed in PDB and “M” indicates genes transcribed in MSM.
Figure 3Comparison of transcription levels of genes transcribed in both media. (A) Transcription levels of glycoside hydrolases (GH, red squares), glycosyltransferases (GT, blue circles), carbohydrate esterases (CE, green triangles), and non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS) and/or polyketide synthases (PKS) (cyan diamonds). All the other genes were indicated with grey dots. (B) Transcription levels of chitinases (red squares), β-1,3-glucanses (blue circles), cellulolytic enzymes (green triangles), and hemicellulolytic enzymes (cyan diamonds). All the other genes were indicated with grey dots. (C) Transcription of genes involved within glycolysis, the citrate cycle and glyoxylate cycle. The numbers in box indicate the log2(fold change) of transcription levels of genes when cultured in MSM compared with in PDB. Positive numbers indicate an increase of transcription levels (numbers ≥1 shown in red) and negative numbers indicate a decrease of transcription levels (numbers ≤ -1 shown in blue) in MSM than in PDB.
Figure 4Characteristics of predicted splicing junctions (SJs). (A) Venn diagrams of SJs predicted based on PDB library, MSM library, and pooled PDB + MSM libraries. (B) Venn diagrams of SJs based on the fggw set of gene models and those based on RNA-Seq. (C) Sequence logos of 5’ splice site (left), branch site (middle), and 3’ splice site (right) sequence of introns. Logos were created using WebLogo 3 [30]. (D) Distribution of lengths of introns based on RNA-Seq. (E) The relation between the branch point A offset from 5’ splice site and the intron length.
Figure 5Schematic diagrams of major types of alternative splicing events detected in transcriptome.
Figure 6Features of alternative spliced introns. (A-E) Length (A), GC content (B), 5’ss score (C), 3’ss score (D), and branching site score (E) distribution of different types of introns. IC, constitutive introns; IR, retained introns; IA-IR, alternatively spliced introns except retained introns. (F) Number of constitutive introns (IC) and retained introns (IR) in each intron retention ratio bin. (G-K) Length (G), GC content (H), 5’ss score (IC), 3’ss score (J), and branching site score (K) distribution of constitutive introns (IC) and retained introns (IR) in each intron retention ratio bin. Scores of 5’ss, 3’ss, and branching site sequences were calculated according Sheth et al. [36] and raw scores are presented here.
Figure 7The relation between splice site scores and isoform relative frequencies. (A) The relation between isoform relative frequencies in PDB and that in MSM. Filled squares, A5SS; open circles, A3SS. (B) The relation between the difference in 5’ss scores and the relative frequencies of A5SS isoforms. (C) The relation between the difference in 3’ss scores and the relative frequencies of A3SS isoforms. (D) The relation between the difference in the sum of 5’ss and 3’ss scores and the relative frequencies of “A5SS and A3SS” (filled squares) and “A5SS or A3SS” (open circles) isoforms.