| Literature DB >> 24482532 |
Bin-Bin Xie1, Qi-Long Qin, Mei Shi, Lei-Lei Chen, Yan-Li Shu, Yan Luo, Xiao-Wei Wang, Jin-Cheng Rong, Zhi-Ting Gong, Dan Li, Cai-Yun Sun, Gui-Ming Liu, Xiao-Wei Dong, Xiu-Hua Pang, Feng Huang, Weifeng Liu, Xiu-Lan Chen, Bai-Cheng Zhou, Yu-Zhong Zhang, Xiao-Yan Song.
Abstract
Saprotrophy on plant biomass is a recently developed nutrition strategy for Trichoderma. However, the physiology and evolution of this new nutrition strategy is still elusive. We report the deep sequencing and analysis of the genome of Trichoderma longibrachiatum, an efficient cellulase producer. The 31.7-Mb genome, smallest among the sequenced Trichoderma species, encodes fewer nutrition-related genes than saprotrophic T. reesei (Tr), including glycoside hydrolases and nonribosomal peptide synthetase-polyketide synthase. Homology and phylogenetic analyses suggest that a large number of nutrition-related genes, including GH18 chitinases, β-1,3/1,6-glucanases, cellulolytic enzymes, and hemicellulolytic enzymes, were lost in the common ancestor of T. longibrachiatum (Tl) and Tr. dN/dS (ω) calculation indicates that all the nutrition-related genes analyzed are under purifying selection. Cellulolytic enzymes, the key enzymes for saprotrophy on plant biomass, are under stronger purifying selection pressure in Tl and Tr than in mycoparasitic species, suggesting that development of the nutrition strategy of saprotrophy on plant biomass has increased the selection pressure. In addition, aspartic proteases, serine proteases, and metalloproteases are subject to stronger purifying selection pressure in Tl and Tr, suggesting that these enzymes may also play important roles in the nutrition. This study provides insights into the physiology and evolution of the nutrition strategy of Trichoderma.Entities:
Keywords: Trichoderma longibrachiatum; carbohydrate-active enzymes; cellulolytic enzymes; dN/dS; proteases; purifying selection
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24482532 PMCID: PMC3942035 DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evu018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Biol Evol ISSN: 1759-6653 Impact factor: 3.416
FA consensus neighbor-joining tree for Tl and close relatives. The tree was created based on 2,143,124 sites in 5,145 orthologous proteins using JTT matrix and 500 bootstrap replications. Bootstrap percentages were shown on the branches. The bar represents 0.05 substitutions per site.
FGains and losses of genes for chitinases (A), β-1,3/1,6-glucanases (B), cellulolytic enzymes (C), and hemicellulolytic enzymes (D). Numbers in boxes indicate the numbers of genes in the extent and ancestral species. Numbers with plus and minus signs on branches indicate gene gains and losses. For chitinases (A), gene gains and losses were estimated based on the sequences of chitinases and the closely related homologs (see Materials and Methods). Two gene numbers were presented for the extent species, with the left one indicating the numbers of chitinases plus the closely related homologs and the right one indicating the numbers of chitinases.
Comparison of CAZymes of Trichoderma
| Species | GH | GT | PL | CE | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 165 | 93 | 4 | 19 | 281 | |
| 174 | 94 | 4 | 19 | 291 | |
| 218 | 97 | 8 | 26 | 349 | |
| 233 | 101 | 7 | 26 | 367 |
Comparison of Major Nutrition-Related CAZymes of Trichoderma
| Species | Fungal Cell Wall Polysaccharides-Degrading Enzymes | Plant Cell Wall Polysaccharides-Degrading Enzymes | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chitinases | β-1,3/1,6-Glucanases | Cellulolytic Enzymes | Hemicellulolytic Enzymes | |
| 17 | 13 | 17 | 10 | |
| 19 | 13 | 17 | 10 | |
| 26 | 15 | 21 | 18 | |
| 31 | 18 | 24 | 18 | |
Comparison of Trichoderma Genomes
| Species | Size | Coverage | Gaps | Scaf. Num. | GC% | Gene Num. | Gene Len. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31.7 | 69× | 0.01 | 185 | 54.0 | 9,409 | 1,654 | |
| 33.9 | 9.0× | 0.05 | 89 | 52.8 | 9,143 | 1,793 | |
| 36.1 | 8.3× | 0.1 | 50 | 49.7 | 11,865 | 1,747 | |
| 39.0 | 8.1× | 0.2 | 135 | 49.2 | 12,518 | 1,710 |
aData for Tr, Ta, and Tv were adopted from Kubicek et al. (2011).
bData for Tr, Ta, and Tv were calculated based on sequence data obtained from DOE JGI (http://genome.jgi-psf.org/, last accessed February 11, 2014).
FBayesian phylogenetic tree based on the concatenated alignments of tef1, cal1, and chi18-5 genes. Posterior probability (>0.5) are shown as percentages.
FVenn diagrams of homologous genes in four Trichoderma species. Numbers in circles indicate the numbers of homologous protein families.
Comparison of NRPS, PKS, and NRPS/PKS of Trichoderma
| Species | NRPS | PKS | NRPS/PKS | NRPS-Like | PKS-Like | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 22 | |
| 8 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 27 | |
| 12 | 18 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 41 | |
| 19 | 20 | 2 | 14 | 1 | 56 |
Comparison of Proteases of Trichoderma
| Species | A | C | G | M | S | T | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 36 | 4 | 64 | 98 | 21 | 238 | |
| 14 | 38 | 4 | 62 | 101 | 20 | 239 | |
| 18 | 39 | 6 | 75 | 176 | 21 | 335 | |
| 16 | 42 | 4 | 74 | 162 | 20 | 318 |
Note.—A, aspartic proteases; C, cysteine proteases; G, glutamic proteases; M, metalloproteases, S, serine proteases; T, threonine proteases.
FComparison of selection pressure in Tl–Tr and Ta − Tv. (A) ω values for GH18 chitinases (blue squares), β-1,3/1,6-glucanases (red circles), cellulolytic enzymes (green up triangles), hemicellulolytic enzymes (cyan down triangles), and GH75 chitosanases (purple diamonds). (B) ω values for GH (red circles), GT (blue squares), CE (green up triangles), and PL (cyan down triangles). (C) ω values for aspartic proteases (blue squares), cysteine proteases (red circles), metalloproteases (green up triangles), serine proteases (cyan down triangles), and threonine proteases (purple diamonds). One data point for metalloproteases with ω(Ta − Tv) 0.107 and ω(Tl–Tr) 0.347 was omitted for clarity. Lower ω values indicate stronger selection pressure.