Literature DB >> 25651892

Transcriptome profiling of Bacillus subtilis OKB105 in response to rice seedlings.

Shanshan Xie1, Huijun Wu2, Lina Chen3, Haoyu Zang4, Yongli Xie5, Xuewen Gao6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are soil beneficial microorganisms that colonize plant roots for nutritional purposes and accordingly benefit plants by increasing plant growth or reducing disease. However, the mechanisms and pathways involved in the interactions between PGPR and plants remain unclear. In order to better understand these complex plant-PGPR interactions, changes in the transcriptome of the typical PGPR Bacillus subtilis in response to rice seedlings were analyzed.
RESULTS: Microarray technology was used to study the global transcriptionl response of B. subtilis OKB105 to rice seedlings after an interaction period of 2 h. A total of 176 genes representing 3.8% of the B. subtilis strain OKB105 transcriptome showed significantly altered expression levels in response to rice seedlings. Among these, 52 were upregulated, the majority of which are involved in metabolism and transport of nutrients, and stress responses, including araA, ywkA, yfls, mtlA, ydgG et al. The 124 genes that were downregulated included cheV, fliL, spmA and tua, and these are involved in chemotaxis, motility, sporulation and teichuronic acid biosynthesis, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: We present a transcriptome analysis of the bacteria Bacillus subtilis OKB105 in response to rice seedings. Many of the 176 differentially expressed genes are likely to be involved in the interaction between Gram-positive bacteria and plants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25651892      PMCID: PMC4326333          DOI: 10.1186/s12866-015-0353-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Microbiol        ISSN: 1471-2180            Impact factor:   3.605


Background

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are soil microorganisms that colonize plant roots, obtaining nutritional benefits from the plant in exchange for stimulating plant growth and reducing plant disease. These benefical plant-microbe interactions are complex. Plants release chemicals such as malic acid that attract rhizobacteria, causing migration of microorganisms towards and along the roots [1-4]. After colonization, rhizobacteria consume carbohydrates and amino acids released by the plant. Simultaneously, PGPR produce substances affecting plant growth and development such as the plant hormones indole-3-acetic acid [5], cytokinins [6], and gibberellins [7]. PGPR also produce volatiles that promote plant growth [8], and they protect plants against soil-borne diseases by predation and parasitism of plant-hostile organisms, outcompeting plant pathogens for niches or specific substances such as nutrients or ferric iron. Furthermore, PGPR also produce antibiotics that work against plant pathogens, and can induce plant resistance directly [9,10]. Despite advances, it remains unclear exactly which mechanisms or pathways are involved in the interactions between PGPR and plants. Recently, transcription microarray technology and comparative proteomic analysis have been applied to improve our understanding of plant-microbe interactions. To date, the focus has largely been on plant responses to benefical bacteria. A study in Arabidopsis showed that some putative auxin-regulated genes and nodulin-like genes were up-regulated, and some ethylene-responsive genes were down-regulated, following exposure to Pseudomonas fluorescens FPT9601-T5 [11]. In another study, rice proteins involved in plant growth and defence were induced after exposure to Bacillus cereus NMSL88 [12]. Proteins reported to be directly or indirectly involved in growth promotion were differentially expressed in rice following inoculation with P. fluorescens KH-1 [13]. Relatively fewer studies have focused on the transcriptional changes that occur in benefical bacteria when interacting with plants. A number of P. aeruginosa genes involved in metabolism, chemotaxis, and type III secretion were upregulated in response to sugar beet exudates [14]. Amino acids and aromatic compounds in root exudates were shown to induce P. putida to colonize the rhizosphere [15]. In another study, several groups of genes from B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 were strongly induced by maize root exudates, most of which were involved in nutrient utilization, bacterial chemotaxis and motility, and non-ribosomal synthesis of antimicrobial peptides and polyketides [16]. These and other studies all investigated the effects of root exudates on PGPR, but studies on the effects of living plants on PGPR are needed if we are to understand the complex nature of plant-PGPR interactions. B. subtilis OKB105 is a derivative of B. subtilis 168 that contains an sfp gene that encodes a phosphopantetheinyl transferase involved in surfactin production and that renders this strain with the ability to produce high levels of surfactin [17]. B. subtilis OKB105 has shown great potential as a growth-promoting and biocontrol agent. The microbe significantly enhanced plant height and fresh weight, lowered the severity of disease caused by tobacco mosaic virus, and exhibited nematicidal activity against Aphelenchoides besseyi, Ditylenchus destructor, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus and Meloidogyne javanica [18,19]. The mechanism by which OKB105 promotes plant growth and reduces disease are not fully understood. To address this question, we performed transcriptomics experiments to identify B. subtilis OKB105 genes that are differentially expressed in response to rice seedlings, and investigated their roles in plant-microbe interactions. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the transcriptomic responses of Bacillus spp. upon interaction with living plants.

Results

Effects of B. subtilis on rice growth

The effects of B. subtilis OKB105 on rice growth was evaluated in this study. After surface sterilization, rice seeds were soaked in B. subtilis OKB105 cell suspensions, dried and incubated at 28°C. Shoot and root lengths of rice seedlings were measured after 10 days, and bacteria increased the shoot length by 25.2%, whereas discrepant analysis of root length showed no difference (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Effect of OKB105 on rice (cultivar 9311) growth. Rice seeds (cultivar 9311) were soaked in B. subtilis OKB105 suspensions at cell densities of 106 cfu ml-1 for 2 h, blotted dry and then placed in wet blotters and incubated in a growth chamber. The shoot and root lengths of rice seedlings were measured after 10 days.

Effect of OKB105 on rice (cultivar 9311) growth. Rice seeds (cultivar 9311) were soaked in B. subtilis OKB105 suspensions at cell densities of 106 cfu ml-1 for 2 h, blotted dry and then placed in wet blotters and incubated in a growth chamber. The shoot and root lengths of rice seedlings were measured after 10 days.

Selection of appropriate interaction time

Plant-microbe interactions are a complex phenomenon and involve recognition, movement, colonization and production of metabolites from both organisms that influence the other. During the initiation phase of the interaction, plants release signals that attract bacteria via a chemotactic response [20], and that are consumed by the bacteria as an energy source. Plant root exudates affect many aspects of bacterial biochemistry and physiology including cell density, the types of bacteria present in the community, and migration towards and colonization of plant roots [21,22]. However, bacteria not in physical contact with rice seedlings can also have a great influence on plants. For example, volatiles produced by Bacillus subtilis promote growth and induce systemic resistance in Arabidopsis [8]. Communication without physical contact is therefore a type of interaction, and whole cell suspensions were collected and tested using realtime PCR analysis for this reason. In order to identify the onset of this early phase, expression levels of genes involved in biofilm formation and nutrient degradation were measured at different timepoints during the incubations. The chosen genes were as follows: galE encoding UDP-glucose-4-epimerase, ywkA encoding malate dehydrogenase, and araA encoding L-arabinose isomerase that are all involved in carbohydrate degradation; tasA encoding a major biofilm matrix component, srfAA encoding surfactin synthetase, and sinI encoding an antagonist of SinR that are all involved in biofilm formation. The results showed that the expression of srfAA and sinI were significantly altered after interacting with rice for only 15 min, part of cells may colonized on rice seedlings and biofilm involvement in response to rice seedlings. In contrast, genes involved in carbohydrate degradation did not undergo significant changes in expression until 2 h, indicating that most of the bacterial population had been exposed to the root exudates by this point (Figure 2). These results suggest that bacteria quickly become established in roots and begin utilizing plant carbohydrates after 2 h, therefore 2 h was chosen as an appropriate interaction time.
Figure 2

Real-time PCR analysis of genes involved in biofilm formation and degradation of nutrients. B. subtilis OKB105 cells were harvested at different times during interaction with rice seedlings (15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h and 12 h) for extracting total RNA. The gene galE encoding UDP-glucose-4-epimerase, ywkA encoding malate dehydrogenase and araA encoding L-arabinose isomerase were identified, and are known to be involved in nutrient degradation. TasA encoding major a biofilm matrix component, srfAA encoding surfactin synthetase, and sinI encoding antagonist of SinR were also identified, and are involved in biofilm formation.

Real-time PCR analysis of genes involved in biofilm formation and degradation of nutrients. B. subtilis OKB105 cells were harvested at different times during interaction with rice seedlings (15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h and 12 h) for extracting total RNA. The gene galE encoding UDP-glucose-4-epimerase, ywkA encoding malate dehydrogenase and araA encoding L-arabinose isomerase were identified, and are known to be involved in nutrient degradation. TasA encoding major a biofilm matrix component, srfAA encoding surfactin synthetase, and sinI encoding antagonist of SinR were also identified, and are involved in biofilm formation.

Microarray analysis of B. subtilis OKB105 gene expression in response to rice

To investigate the molecular mechanisms involved in plant-microbe interactions, three independent experiments were carried out. To evaluate sample consistency, microarray data were analysed using cluster 3.0 software, and hierarchical analysis showed clearly defined groups for the three replicated experimental rice seedling samples and the three replicated control samples (Figure 3), indicating consistency.
Figure 3

Cluster analysis of microarray data. CK, B. subtilis OKB105 without contact with rice seedlings; T, B. subtilis OKB105 after interaction with rice seedlings. The cluster analysis was performed using Cluster 3.0 software. Red and green indicate higher (>2.0) and lower (<0.5) ratios, respectively. Each treatment was repeated three times.

Cluster analysis of microarray data. CK, B. subtilis OKB105 without contact with rice seedlings; T, B. subtilis OKB105 after interaction with rice seedlings. The cluster analysis was performed using Cluster 3.0 software. Red and green indicate higher (>2.0) and lower (<0.5) ratios, respectively. Each treatment was repeated three times. Differentially expressed genes were identified by the following selection criteria: (1) changes in gene expression occurred in the same direction in all three microarray analyses, (2) the average change in expression level was greater than 2-fold for up- and downregulated genes, (3) the q value was less than 0.05. When this criterion was applied, a total of 176 genes representing 3.8% of the transcriptome were significantly altered in response to rice seedlings. Among these differentially expressed genes, 52 were upregulated and 124 were downregulated (Table 1). In addition, a significant proportion (~30%) of the differentially expressed genes encoded proteins with putative functions or were described as ‘hypothetical proteins’ in the databases. The majority of the differentially expressed genes belonged to the following functional categories: Transport/binding proteins and lipoproteins (15.38% of upregulated genes, 8.87% of downregulated genes); RNA synthesis (13.46% of upregulated genes, 4.84% of downregulated genes); Metabolism of carbohydrates and related molecules (11.54% of upregulated genes, 9.68% of downregulated genes); Metabolism of amino acids and related molecules (9.62% of upregulated genes, 9.68% of downregulated genes); sporulation (8.06% of downregulated genes); Mobility and chemotaxis (6.45% of downregulated genes) (Figure 4). The majority were related to transport and metabolism, and this may be due to the importance of material and energy exchange between plant and Bacillus. Genes related to sporulation were downregulated. This may be because without nutrition provided by plant root exudates, nutrient deprivation and general stress triggers differentiation into dormant spores. In addition, it is viable cells rather than dormant spores that interact with rice seedlings.
Table 1

OKB105 genes differentially expressed in response to rice seedlings

Gene Annotation Fold-change ratio q-value (%)
Up-regulated genes
Cell wall (3.85%)
yngB UTP-glucose-1-phosphate uridylytransferase2.631 0
dacA Penicillin-binding protein 52.26470
Transport/binding and lipoproteins (15.38%)
ydgH Putative drug exporter of the RND superfamily16.14820
mtlA PTS mannitol-specific enzyme II CB component5.77770
yhcA Multidrug resistance protein5.2704 0
ykoY Transporter3.84490
yxkD Efflux transporter2.79770
yflA Amino acid carrier protein2.10640
ydfM Cation efflux system2.0830
yflS 2-Oxoglutarate/malate translocator2.08060
Sensors (signal transduction) (3.85%)
yclJ Two-component response regulator YclK2.40040
yclK Two-component sensor histidine kinase2.33070
Sporulation (1.92%)
rapF Response regulator aspartate phosphatase2.4080
Metabolism of carbohydrates and related molecules (11.54%)
mtlD Mannitol-1-phosphate dehydrogenase5.57070
ywkA Malate dehydrogenase4.120
araA L-arabinose isomerase2.71490
galE UDP-glucose 4-epimerase2.63840
yngB UTP-glucose-1-phosphate uridylytransfarase2.6310
mmgD Citrate synthase III2.0082
Metabolism of amino acids and related molecules (9.62%)
proB Glutamate-5-kinase2.54090
ald L-alanine dehydrogenase2.35220
speA Arginine decarboxylase2.26310
yrpC Glutamate racemase2.0801 0
hutH histidase2.01540
Metabolism of lipids (1.92%)
yngG Hydroxymethylglutary-COA lyase2.2458 0
RNA regulation (13.46%)
ydgG MarR family transcriptional regulator13.5150
yhbI Transcriptional regulator (MarR family)7.90160
yhgD Transcriptional regulator (TerR/AcrR family)7.5195
yhcB Trp repressor binding protein2.53660
fruR Transcriptional repressor of the fructose operon2.41640
yugG Lrp/Asnc family transcriptional regulator2.24580
yusO MarR family transcriptional regulator2.19940
Protein synthesis (1.92%)
pheS Phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase2.03560
Protein modification (1.92%)
yxaL Serine/threonine protein kinase2.32340
Adaptation to atypical conditions (1.92%)
rsbX Serine phosphatase2.18210
Detoxification (1.92%)
ykoY Toxic anion resistance protein3.44380
Phage-related functions (1.92%)
yhgE Phage infection protein5.07030
Unknown (28.85%)
ydfK Putative integral inner membrane protein3.84490
yvpB Putative hydrolase3.52120
yneF Hypothetical protein3.08630
yrkO Putative integral inner membrane protein2.67020
yngA Putative conserved membrane protein2.47750
yhaJ Putative bacteriocin2.42610
yfkA Putative Fe-S oxidoreductase2.41640
yfhE Hypothetical protein2.38040
ykcB Putative integral inner membrane protein2.29930
ywkB Putative transporter2.26290
yaaT Hypothetical protein2.24970
ykaA Putative Pit accessory protein2.09010
ydhB Putative integral inner membrane protein2.04050
ykyB Hypothetical protein2.02190
Down-regulated
Cell wall (8.06%)
tuaD Biosynthesis of teichuronic acid0.45360
tuaA Biosynthesis of teichuronic acid0.43820
lytD N-Acetylglucosaminidase0.43710
tuaC Biosynthesis of teichuronic acid0.435
tuaF Biosynthesis of teichuronic acid0.39490
tuaG Biosynthesis of teichuronic acid0.39220
tuaB Biosynthesis of teichuronic acid0.38550
pbpE Penicillin-binding protein 40.32190
tuaH Biosynthesis of teichuronic acid0.3190
tuaE Biosynthesis of teichuronic acid0.28410
Transport/binding proteins and lipoproteins (8.87%)
opuD Glycine betaine transporter0.4910
gabP γ-Aminobutyrate permease0.48970
ydhF Lipoproteins0.48920
iolF Inositol transport protein0.46870
yxlG ABC transporter permease0.45360
yxlF ABC transporter0.35790
glpF Glycerol uptake facilitor0.33930
yteP Transmembrane lipoprotein0.30540
ytcQ Lipoprotein0.2210
ytcP ABC transporter0.20210
yybF Antibotic resistance protein0.18470
Mobility and chemotaixs (6.45%)
fliL Flagellar protein required for flagellar formation
yvyG Flagellar protein0.48860
flgK Flagellar hook-associated protein 1 (HAP1)0.43950
hag Flagellin protein0.39630
fliK Flagellar hook-length control0.36920
flgL Flagellar hook-associated protein # (HAP3)0.3610
cheV Modulation of cheA activity in response to attractants0.34040
fliJ Flagellar protein required for formation of basal body0.21750
Sporulation (8.06%)
spmA Spore maturation protein0.49810
phrC Phosphatase regulator0.49760
cgeD Matyration of the outermost layer of the spore0.49220
usd Required for translation of spoIII D0.48930
rapG Response regulator aspartate phosphatase0.48440
tlp Small acid-soluble spore protein0.43540
phrE Phosphatase regulator0.42160
phrG Response regulator aspartate phosphatase0.35950
ywcE Protein required for proper spore morphogenesis and germination0.15610
csfB Forespore-specific protein0.23530
Metabolism of carbohydrates and related molecules (9.68%)
abnA Arabinan-endo-1,5-α-L-arabinase0.48330
pdhB Pyruvate dehydrogenase0.47660
bglH β-Glucosidase0.42390
iolH Myo-inositol catabolism0.40760
iolG Myo-inositol catabolism0.38850
glpK Glycerol kinase0.34780
yteT Rhamnogalacturonyl dehydrogenase0.2990
iolE Myo-inositol catabolism0.29720
iolD Myo-inositol catabolism0.27120
iolB Myo-inositol catabolism0.26340
iolC Myo-inositol catabolism0.26090
yteR Unsaturated rhamnogalacturonyl hydrolase0.22210
Metabolism of amino acids and related molecules (9.68%)
argG Argininosuccinate synthase0.490
leuA 2-Isopropylmalate synthase0.47950
yuxL Acylaminoacyl-peptidase0.47180
vpr Minor extracellular serine protease0.46610
leuD 3-Isopropylmalate dehydratase0.4620
ymfH Processing protease0.46120
leuB 3-Inospropylmalate dehydratase0.44760
epr Minor extracellular serine protease0.4290
argC N-Acetylornithine aminotransferase0.3940
racX Amino acid racemase0.36080
ilvC Ketol-acid dehydratase0.35240
yaaO Lysine decarboxylase0.25530
Metabolism of nucleotides and nucleic acids (4.03%)
purF Glutamine phosphoribosylpyrophosphate aminotransferase0.45320
purM Phosphoribosylglycinamidezole synthetase0.43130
purD Phosphoribosylglycinamide synthetase0.41580
purH Phosphoribosylglycinamide carboxy formyl formyltransferase0.40080
purN Phosphoribosylglycinamide formyltransferase0.32430
Metabolism of lipids (2.42%)
yusK Acetyl-CoA C-acyltransferase0.49730
glpQ Glycerophosphoryl diester phosphodiesterase0.47210
yvaG 3-Oxoacyl-acyl-carrier protein reductase0.44240
Metabolism of coenzymes and prosthetic groups (0.81%)
folC Folyl-polyglutamate synthetase0.39520
RNA synthesis (4.84%)
spo0A Two-component response regulator central for the initiation of sporulation0.49240
sigA RNA polymerase major sigma factor0.43320
abh Transcriptional regulator of transition state genes0.42660
yozG Transcriptional regulator0.31540
sigY RNA polymerase ECF-type sigma factor0.25520
ykoM Transcriptional regulator0.25170
Protein synthesis (2.42%)
yxlE Negative regulator of sigma-Y antivity0.27270
yxlD Sigma-Y antisigma factor component0.26290
yxlC Sigma-Y antisigma factor0.22760
Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (1.61%)
ileS Isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase0.44350
valS Valy-tRNA synthetase0.34970
Detoxification (1.61%)
ybfO Erythromycin esterase0.47840
yndN Fosfomycin resistance protein0.47110
Unknown (31.45%)
yisT Hypothetical protein0.48270
yukJ Hypothetical protein0.47660
ysdB Hypothetical protein0.4740
ylxF Putative kinesin-like protein0.4730
yrzF Putative serine/threonine-protein kinase0.47230
ywqH Hypothetical protein0.47150
ykpC Hypothetical protein0.47110
ypiB Hypothetical protein0.46470
yitR Hypothetical protein0.46270
yvfG Hypothetical protein0.46020
yhfM Hypothetical protein0.45220
yvaG Putative oxidoreductase0.44240
yqhO Hypothetical protein0.44060
ytzD Hypothetical protein0.43490
ywnF Hypothetical protein0.43160
yfmB Hypothetical protein0.42970
ypiF Hypothetical protein0.42390
yqhL Hypothetical protein0.42050
yjfB Hypothetical protein0.41650
yocB Hypothetical protein0.40420
yyaB Putative integral inner membrane protein0.40360
ytbQ Putative nucleoside-diphosphate-sugar epimerase0.38510
ybgB Hypothetical protein0.37870
yxbC Hypothetical protein0.35980
yrzL Hypothetical protein0.35650
yuiB Hypothetical protein0.35570
ykrP Putative integral inner membrane protein0.33940
yhzC Hypothetical protein0.32910
yyaO Hypothetical protein0.25530
yxbB Putative S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methyltransferase0.23250
yuiA Hypothetical protein0.20910
yxnB Hypothetical protein0.16040
Figure 4

Functional categories of OKB105 genes exhibiting altered transcription after interaction with rice seedlings. 122 genes were of known function and classified accordingly, while 54 were of unknown function.

OKB105 genes differentially expressed in response to rice seedlings Functional categories of OKB105 genes exhibiting altered transcription after interaction with rice seedlings. 122 genes were of known function and classified accordingly, while 54 were of unknown function.

Validation of microarray results by real-time PCR

Seven up-regulated and two down-regulated genes were chosen for evaluation by real-time PCR. All nine genes were confirmed as being differentially expressed in response to rice seedlings (Figure 5), which confirmed the reliability of the microarray data.
Figure 5

Real-time PCR validation of differentially expressed genes. Expression levels of randomly selected genes were measured using a 7500 Fast real-time PCR System. Statistically significant differences were determined using Fisher’s test (P ≤0.05).

Real-time PCR validation of differentially expressed genes. Expression levels of randomly selected genes were measured using a 7500 Fast real-time PCR System. Statistically significant differences were determined using Fisher’s test (P ≤0.05).

Differentially expressed genes with known function

Among the 176 differentially expressed genes, 122 had known functions such as involvement in aspects of metabolism, transport, mobility, and chemotaxis. Of these, four groups of genes were particularly strongly affected by rice seedlings (Figure 6).
Figure 6

A subset of OKB105 genes exhibiting altered expression in response to rice seedlings. I, genes involved in metabolism or transport of carbohydrates and amino acids; II, genes associated with RNA synthesis including transcriptional regulators associated with stress responses; III, genes involved in chemotaxis, motility and sporulation; IV, genes associated with teichuronic acid biosynthesis. Cluster analysis was performed using cluster 3.0 software. Red and green indicate higher (>2.0) and lower (<0.5) ratios, respectively. Each treatment was repeated three times.

A subset of OKB105 genes exhibiting altered expression in response to rice seedlings. I, genes involved in metabolism or transport of carbohydrates and amino acids; II, genes associated with RNA synthesis including transcriptional regulators associated with stress responses; III, genes involved in chemotaxis, motility and sporulation; IV, genes associated with teichuronic acid biosynthesis. Cluster analysis was performed using cluster 3.0 software. Red and green indicate higher (>2.0) and lower (<0.5) ratios, respectively. Each treatment was repeated three times. (1) 43 genes involved in metabolism or transport of carbohydrates or amino acids were significantly altered in response to rice seedlings. Of these, galE and yngB (galactose metabolism), araA (arabinose utilization) and mtlD (mannose metabolism) were upregulated in response to rice seedlings. Genes proB, ald, hutH, involved in proline, alanine, and histidine metabolism respectively, were also upregulated, while genes involved in leucine (leuA, leuB, leuD) and arginine (argC, argG) biosynthesis were downregulated. Genes encoding proteins involved in carbohydrate and amino acid transport such as yfls, yflA, and mtlA were also stimulated. This finding is perhaps not surprising because malate, glucose, arabinose, mannose, glucuronic acid, histidine, proline, leucine, alanine and arginine are all present in rice root exudates cultured in hydroponic conditions [23,24]. In this study, ywkA involved in malate metabolism, was upregulated. Malate has been reported to specifically attract B. subtilis in an isomer- and dose-dependent manner [22], suggesting that root exudates serve as energy sources and attractants in the interaction between roots and rhizobacteria. On the other hand, B. subtilis OKB105 cells not exposed to rice seedlings may be induced to sporulate due to a lack of energy that would otherwise be provided by the rice seedlings. Correspondingly, bacterial metabolism may remain low, and genes involved in the metabolism of carbohydrates or amino acids may be upregulated in response to rice seedlings. Genes in the B. subtilis inositol operon (iolB, iolC, iolD, iolE, iolF, iolG, iolH), involved in myo-inositol catabolism, were downregulated. Previous reports suggested glucose is the main sugar found in rice root exudates, and DNA microarray results indicated that the iol operon was repressed by glucose through catabolite repression [23,25]. In summary, the presence of glucose inhibited the expression of genes involved in inositol metabolism. (2) 13 genes associated with RNA synthesis including stress response transcriptional regulators were significantly upregulated. Among these, ydgG and yhbI showed the biggest changes (ydgG, 13.515-fold; yhbI, 7.9016-fold). These genes belong to the MarR transcriptional regulator family that has been reported to regulate expression of proteins conferring resistance to multiple antibiotics, organic components, detergents, and oxidative stress agents [26-28]. During growth, rice may produce compounds such as momilactone B and 5-resorcinol which are harmful to rhizobacteria [29,30]. Upregulation of stress-associated transcriptional regulators may assist rhizobacteria to adapt to environmental changes and confer a competitive advantage in the rhizosphere. (3) The third group of genes associated with chemotaxis, motility and sporulation were downregulated. Amino acids and sugars in root exudates act as attractants that cause microorganisms to move towards roots [31]. We might expect chemotaxis and motility-associated genes such as cheV, fliL, and flgK to be upregulated, but these were downregulated in this study. This may be due to the different detection times employed. Upon initiation of the interaction process, bacteria recognize plant signals and move towards plant roots. Bacterial motility in the rhizosphere involves several processes such as chemotaxis, flagella-driven motility, swarming, and production of surfactants [32-35]. Expression of srfAA and sinI were significantly altered after interacting with rice for only 15 min (Figure 2), indicating that the bacteria may well have finished migrating towards the roots by 2 h. In order to conserve energy, expression of genes associated with chemotaxis and motility could remain at a low level. In addition, the rapid surface motility of bacteria may be independent of flagella [36], which may also explain the downregulation of these genes. Sporulation in B. subtilis can be induced by starvation of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus. In this study, five genes (spmA, phrC, cgeD, usd, rapG) involved in sporulation were downregulated after interaction with rice. This may be explained by root exudates supplying the energy required for the dynamic B. subtilis cells. Alternatively, B. subtilis can lie dormant as if energy is in short supply or when encountering a hostile environment. During plant-microbe interactions both plants and PGPR receive mutual benefits, and it is viable microbial cells rather than dormant spores that interact with rice seedlings. This may explain why genes related to sporulation were down-regulated during the detection time in this study. (4) The fourth group of genes exhibiting altered expression levels upon interaction with rice seedlings were associated with teichuronic acid biosynthesis. Anionic polymers make up 35-60% of the entire dry weight of the vegetative cell wall in B. subtilis, of which teichoic and teichuronic acids are the main types. When phosphate is sufficient, teichoic acids are present, whereas teichuronic acids predominate under phosphate-limiting conditions [37-39]. In this study, the tua operon (tuaA, tuaB, tuaC, tuaD, tuaE, tuaF, tuaG, tuaH) involved in teichuronic acid biosynthesis was repressed in response to rice seedlings, indicating that phosphate was sufficient and non-limiting in the rice-B. subtilis OKB105 interaction.

Discussion

In the present study, a global analysis of transcription in B. subtilis OKB105 in response to rice seedlings was performed using microarray experiments. A total of 43 genes associated with metabolism or transport of carbohydrates and amino acids exhibited differential expression. Genes involved in metabolism or transport of carbohydrates and amino acids were upregulated, while genes associated with amino acid biosynthesis were downregulated. Genes involved in inositol metabolism (iolB, iolC, iolD, iolE, iolG, iolH) were also downregulated due to suppression by glucose [40]. Nearly a quarter of the genes exhibiting altered expression were involved in transport or utilization of nutrients, suggesting rhizobacteria use carbohydrates and amino acids released by plants as energy sources. Transcriptional regulators associated with stress responses were also affected. Rice seedlings not only produce nutrients but also release harmful compounds such as momilactone B and 5-resorcinol [29,30]. In response to these harmful substances, several genes belonging to the MarR family of transcriptional regulators were upregulated. MarR family proteins have been reported to regulate the expression of proteins conferring resistance to multiple antibiotics, organic components, detergents, and oxidative stress agents [26-28]. This observation may reflect the adaptability of B. subtilis, which is important among the highly competitive microbial communities vying to reside in the rhizosphere. Many Bacillus species have been reported to stimulate plant growth under different conditions [41,42]. The beneficial effects conferred by Bacillus species on plants may operate directly via enhanced provision of nutrients, phytohormones or volatiles, or indirectly through production of antibiotics and induction of plant resistance mechanisms (ISR) [8]. In the present study, B. subtilis OKB105 suspension increased shoot length by 25.2%, while genes related to plant growth were not up or downregulated. This phenomenon may be explained by at least three reasons: (1) plant-microbe interactions are highly complex. Within the time frame of the experiments conducted, B. subtilis began to utilize nutrients released by the plant and started to adapt to the changing environment, but the time for production of plant growth promoting substances may have been insufficient, (2) not all bacterial cells in contact with plants necessarily establish a productive interaction, therefore the effects may be diluted below detection levels as the cell populations are averaged, (3) the functions of some differentially expressed genes remain unknown, and this increases the difficulty of studying plant-microbe interactions. Determination of the molecular mechanisms involved in plant-rhizobacteria interactions requires much further study.

Conclusion

Global analysis of transcription in B. subtilis OKB105 in response to rice seedlings was performed using microarray experiments. A total of 176 genes representing 3.8% of the B. subtilis strain OKB105 transcriptome showed significantly altered expression levels in response to rice seedlings. Differentially expressed genes were mainly involved in metabolism and transport of nutrients, stress responses, chemotaxis, motility, sporulation and teichuronic acid biosynthesis. The results had indicated that B. subtilis OKB105 could utilize carbohydrates and amino acids released by rice as energy sources, and then OKB105 migrates towards and establishes a relationship with rice. During the interaction process, OKB105 may enhance self-adaptability and cell viability in rhizosphere by inducing the expression of some transcriptional regulators and repressing sporulation-related genes expression, respectively. However, potential genes related to plant growth were not detected. More studies are needed to illustrate the nature of the complex plant-microbe interactions.

Methods

Preparation of B. subtilis OKB105 suspension

B. subtilis OKB105 was grown in LB at 37°C for 12 h. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C, resuspended in distilled water and adjusted to a final concentration of 106 cfu ml-1. The growth-promoting activity of B. subtilis OKB105 on rice was tested according to the standard roll towel method [14]. Rice seeds (cultivar 9311) were surface sterilized with 70% (v/v) ethanol for 1 min, disinfected with 5% (w/v) sodium hypochlorite for 15 min, and washed three times with sterile distilled water. After surface sterilization, rice seeds were soaked in bacterial suspensions for 2 h, blotted dry, placed in wet blotters and incubated in a growth chamber at 28°C for 10 days. Seeds soaked in sterile water were used as the control. The shoot and root lengths of rice seedlings were measured after 10 days. Each treatment included 30 seedlings and was repeated five times, and all experiments were repeated three times.

B. subtilis-rice interactions

Surface-sterilized rice seeds were germinated in Petri dishes at 28°C for 3 days. Germinated seeds were transplanted into 10 individual sterile vessels, and each vessel containing 30 rice seedings was incubated at 28°C. After 7 days of growth, 50 ml 106 cfu/ml B. subtilis OKB105 suspension was added. To determine the most suitable interaction time for subsequent transcription microarray analysis, rice seedlings were removed at 15 min, 30 min, and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h. OKB105 cells not in physical contact with rice seedlings and cells washed from roots were collected by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 30 min at 4°C and used for RNA extraction. B. subtilis OKB105 suspensions not interacting with rice were used as a control. Expression of genes involved in biofilm formation and nutrient degradation was detected using real-time PCR. The experiment was repeated three times.

Total RNA extraction and microarray analysis

50 ml 106 cfu/ml B. subtilis OKB105 suspensions incubated with 30 rice seedlings for 2 h were harvested for microarray analysis, and OKB105 cells not interacting with rice were used as a control. Total RNA was extracted using the Bacterial RNA Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Random priming cDNA synthesis, cDNA fragmentation and terminal labeling with biotinylated GeneChip DNA labeling reagent, and hybridization to the Affymetrix Bacillus subtilis Genome Array GeneChip were carried out by CapitalBio (CapitalBio Corporation, Beijing, China). The Bacillus subtilis genome array was custom designed by Affymetrix (Santa Clara, Calif.) using the published DNA sequence (GenBank accession no. NC_000964) [43]. The array contained probe sets to interrogate approximately 4,350 ORFs and 600 intergenic regions with an additional 45 control probe sets, and detects the antisense strand of the B. subtilis transcript. This design was completed as a custom design for Genencor International, Inc. in June 1998 and made available broadly in 2002. EST data used in the experimental design was from the Bacillus subtilis Genome Sequencing Project of the Institut Pasteur 10.1, December 1997. Each treatment was repeated three times. Microarray data were collected and analyzed using the Affymetrix GeneChip Command Console software. And then further analyzed using hierarchical clustering with average linkage. Finally, tree visualization was performed with Java Treeview (Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA). Transcripts were designated as significantly differentially expressed when they exhibited at least a 2-fold change in expression level and a q value of less than 0.05.

Real-time PCR

First-strand cDNA was synthesized using reverse transcriptase (TaKaRa Bio Inc, Dalian, China) with random hexamer primers. Real-time PCR was performed using SYBR Premix Ex Taq polymerase (TaKaRa Bio Inc, Dalian, China) with an ABI 7500 Fast Real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). 16S rRNA was used to normalize RNA levels. Expression levels of galE, yywkA, araA, sinI, tasA and srfAA were measured at different timepoints during the plant-microbe interactions. Microarray results were validated by measuring the expression levels of some randomly chosen differentially expressed genes.

Microarray data accesion number

Microarray data have been deposited in the GEO database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accssion number GSE62421.

Data analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out by Fisher’s least-significant difference test (P ≤ 0.05) using SPSS software.
  31 in total

1.  Allelopathic substance in rice root exudates: rediscovery of momilactone B as an allelochemical.

Authors:  Hisashi Kato-Noguchi
Journal:  J Plant Physiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.549

2.  Analysis of Pseudomonas fluorescens F113 genes implicated in flagellar filament synthesis and their role in competitive root colonization.

Authors:  Silvia Capdevila; Francisco M Martínez-Granero; María Sánchez-Contreras; Rafael Rivilla; Marta Martín
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 3.  The many faces of the helix-turn-helix domain: transcription regulation and beyond.

Authors:  L Aravind; Vivek Anantharaman; Santhanam Balaji; M Mohan Babu; Lakshminarayan M Iyer
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 16.408

Review 4.  Bacillus lipopeptides: versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol.

Authors:  Marc Ongena; Philippe Jacques
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 17.079

5.  The purL gene of Bacillus subtilis is associated with nematicidal activity.

Authors:  Yanfei Xia; Shanshan Xie; Xin Ma; Huijun Wu; Xuan Wang; Xuewen Gao
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 2.742

6.  RNA expression analysis using an antisense Bacillus subtilis genome array.

Authors:  J M Lee; S Zhang; S Saha; S Santa Anna; C Jiang; J Perkins
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  The structure of a polymer containing galactosamine from walls of Bacillus subtilis 168.

Authors:  V N Shibaev; M Duckworth; A R Archibald; J Baddiley
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 3.857

8.  Identification of a genetic locus required for biosynthesis of the lipopeptide antibiotic surfactin in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  M M Nakano; M A Marahiel; P Zuber
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Transcriptomic profiling of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 in response to maize root exudates.

Authors:  Ben Fan; Lilia C Carvalhais; Anke Becker; Dmitri Fedoseyenko; Nicolaus von Wirén; Rainer Borriss
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Genomic analysis reveals the major driving forces of bacterial life in the rhizosphere.

Authors:  Miguel A Matilla; Manuel Espinosa-Urgel; José J Rodríguez-Herva; Juan L Ramos; María Isabel Ramos-González
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  10 in total

1.  Genome wide transcriptional profiling of Herbaspirillum seropedicae SmR1 grown in the presence of naringenin.

Authors:  Michelle Z Tadra-Sfeir; Helisson Faoro; Doumit Camilios-Neto; Liziane Brusamarello-Santos; Eduardo Balsanelli; Vinicius Weiss; Valter A Baura; Roseli Wassem; Leonardo M Cruz; Fábio De Oliveira Pedrosa; Emanuel M Souza; Rose A Monteiro
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  Comparative Transcriptomics of Bacillus mycoides Strains in Response to Potato-Root Exudates Reveals Different Genetic Adaptation of Endophytic and Soil Isolates.

Authors:  Yanglei Yi; Anne de Jong; Elrike Frenzel; Oscar P Kuipers
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Nematode neuropeptides as transgenic nematicides.

Authors:  Neil D Warnock; Leonie Wilson; Cheryl Patten; Colin C Fleming; Aaron G Maule; Johnathan J Dalzell
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 6.823

4.  Sugarcane apoplast fluid modulates the global transcriptional profile of the diazotrophic bacteria Paraburkholderia tropica strain Ppe8.

Authors:  Paula Renata Alves da Silva; Márcia Soares Vidal; Cleiton de Paula Soares; Valéria Polese; Michelle Zibetti Tadra-Sfeir; Emanuel Maltempi de Souza; Jean Luiz Simões-Araújo; José Ivo Baldani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Herbicide-tolerant endophytic bacteria of rice plants as the biopriming agents for fertility recovery and disease suppression of unhealthy rice seeds.

Authors:  Chakrapong Rangjaroen; Saisamorn Lumyong; William T Sloan; Rungroch Sungthong
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.215

6.  Interactional mechanisms of Paenibacillus polymyxa SC2 and pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) suggested by transcriptomics.

Authors:  Hu Liu; Yufei Li; Ke Ge; Binghai Du; Kai Liu; Chengqiang Wang; Yanqin Ding
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.605

7.  Comparative genomic and functional analyses of four sequenced Bacillus cereus genomes reveal conservation of genes relevant to plant-growth-promoting traits.

Authors:  Qingchao Zeng; Jianbo Xie; Yan Li; Tantan Gao; Cheng Xu; Qi Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Bacillus velezensis FZB42 in 2018: The Gram-Positive Model Strain for Plant Growth Promotion and Biocontrol.

Authors:  Ben Fan; Cong Wang; Xiaofeng Song; Xiaolei Ding; Liming Wu; Huijun Wu; Xuewen Gao; Rainer Borriss
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Contribution of the cold shock protein CspA to virulence in Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae.

Authors:  Liming Wu; Liumin Ma; Xi Li; Ziyang Huang; Xuewen Gao
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 5.663

10.  Inducible Antibacterial Activity in the Bacillales by Triphenyl Tetrazolium Chloride.

Authors:  Laura Sierra-Zapata; Javier C Álvarez; Magally Romero-Tabarez; Mark W Silby; Matthew F Traxler; Scott W Behie; Rita de Cassia Pessotti; Valeska Villegas-Escobar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.