| Literature DB >> 25651858 |
Ying Zhu1, Yu Zhang2,3, Guosheng Shi4, Jinrong Yang5,6, Jichao Zhang7, Wenxin Li8, Aiguo Li9, Renzhong Tai10, Haiping Fang11, Chunhai Fan12,13, Qing Huang14.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nanomaterials hold great promise for applications in the delivery of various molecules with poor cell penetration, yet its potential for delivery of metal ions is rarely considered. Particularly, there is limited insight about the cytotoxicity triggered by nanoparticle-ion interactions. Oxidative stress is one of the major toxicological mechanisms for nanomaterials, and we propose that it may also contribute to nanoparticle-ion complexes induced cytotoxicity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25651858 PMCID: PMC4374301 DOI: 10.1186/s12989-014-0075-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Part Fibre Toxicol ISSN: 1743-8977 Impact factor: 9.400
Figure 1Interactions of NDs with metal ions trigger cytotoxicity. a: Scheme of adsorption of metal ions on NDs leads to cellular responses. b: The adsorption amounts (blue) and adsorption energies (red) of metal ions on NDs obtained by ICP-MS measurements and theoretical computation, respectively. c: The IC50 values of metal ions and ND-ion mixture and the differences between them. d: Optical images of L929 cells after incubation with NDs, Cu2+ and NDs-Cu2+ mixture for 24 h.
Figure 2Cu vectorized by NDs induced more remarkable cytotoxicity than by other nanoparticles. Trypan blue exclusion test of cell viability after incubation with various kinds of nanoparticle-Cu2+ mixture for 24 h.
Figure 3Interactions between NDs and Cu determine their internalization fate. a: STXM images of copper distribution in a typical control L929 cell (top left), cell after incubation with NDs (top right), Cu2+ (bottom left), and NDs-Cu2+ mixture (bottom right) for 24 h. The range of quantities noted by the color bar is from 3.2 × 10−6 to 7.0 × 10−6 in (top left), from 3.9 × 10−6 to 7.2 × 10−6 in (top right), from 2.4 × 10−6 to 7.2 × 10−6 in (bottom left) and from 6.5 × 10−6 to 5.0 × 10−5 in (bottom right). The scanning step was 50 nm. b: Imaging of intracellular copper distribution by microXRF. Elemental maps of copper (upper) and zinc (lower) are drawn. The size of a pixel is 3 μm × 3 μm. c: Intracellular Cu2+ concentration determined by ICP-MS (**p < 0.01, one-way ANOVA for comparison).
Figure 4Release profile of Cu from ND-Cu complex at different pH values. a: Desorption amount of Cu2+ from ND-Cu2+ complexes in different pH values: pH 7.4 and pH 5.5 within 24 h. b: The most stable structures of the ND-Cu2+ complex at high and low pH (denoted by ND-Cu2+ and NDH-Cu2+, respectively) obtained by theoretical computation. c: Molecular modeling illustrations for the adsorption of Cu2+ on ND aggregates at high pH and low pH.
Figure 5Enhancement of bioeffects by ND-vectorized Cu . a and b: Enhancement of Cellular ROS level by ND-vectorized Cu2+. a: ROS generation, b: NAC protection (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, one-way ANOVA for comparison). c: TEM images of a typical L929 cell after incubation with NDs, Cu2+ and NDs-Cu2+ mixture for 24 h. Arrows indicate NDs (Scale bars = 2 μm). d: Flow cytometric analysis of L929 cells after incubation with NDs, Cu2+ and NDs-Cu2+ mixture for 24 h.