Literature DB >> 25651406

Electrochemically and bioelectrochemically induced ammonium recovery.

Sylvia Gildemyn1, Amanda K Luther2, Stephen J Andersen1, Joachim Desloover1, Korneel Rabaey3.   

Abstract

Streams such as urine and manure can contain high levels of ammonium, which could be recovered for reuse in agriculture or chemistry. The extraction of ammonium from an ammonium-rich stream is demonstrated using an electrochemical and a bioelectrochemical system. Both systems are controlled by a potentiostat to either fix the current (for the electrochemical cell) or fix the potential of the working electrode (for the bioelectrochemical cell). In the bioelectrochemical cell, electroactive bacteria catalyze the anodic reaction, whereas in the electrochemical cell the potentiostat applies a higher voltage to produce a current. The current and consequent restoration of the charge balance across the cell allow the transport of cations, such as ammonium, across a cation exchange membrane from the anolyte to the catholyte. The high pH of the catholyte leads to formation of ammonia, which can be stripped from the medium and captured in an acid solution, thus enabling the recovery of a valuable nutrient. The flux of ammonium across the membrane is characterized at different anolyte ammonium concentrations and currents for both the abiotic and biotic reactor systems. Both systems are compared based on current and removal efficiencies for ammonium, as well as the energy input required to drive ammonium transfer across the cation exchange membrane. Finally, a comparative analysis considering key aspects such as reliability, electrode cost, and rate is made. This video article and protocol provide the necessary information to conduct electrochemical and bioelectrochemical ammonia recovery experiments. The reactor setup for the two cases is explained, as well as the reactor operation. We elaborate on data analysis for both reactor types and on the advantages and disadvantages of bioelectrochemical and electrochemical systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25651406      PMCID: PMC4354552          DOI: 10.3791/52405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  13 in total

1.  Ammonium recovery and energy production from urine by a microbial fuel cell.

Authors:  P Kuntke; K M Smiech; H Bruning; G Zeeman; M Saakes; T H J A Sleutels; H V M Hamelers; C J N Buisman
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  Power generation in fed-batch microbial fuel cells as a function of ionic strength, temperature, and reactor configuration.

Authors:  Hong Liu; Shaoan Cheng; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Pretreatment of anaerobic digestion effluent with ammonia stripping and biogas purification.

Authors:  Xiaohui Lei; Norio Sugiura; Chuanping Feng; Takaaki Maekawa
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2006-11-19       Impact factor: 10.588

4.  Application of resazurin for estimating abundance of contaminant-degrading micro-organisms.

Authors:  T F Guerin; M Mondido; B McClenn; B Peasley
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.858

5.  The anode potential regulates bacterial activity in microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Peter Aelterman; Stefano Freguia; Jurg Keller; Willy Verstraete; Korneel Rabaey
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  Minimizing losses in bio-electrochemical systems: the road to applications.

Authors:  Peter Clauwaert; Peter Aelterman; The Hai Pham; Liesje De Schamphelaire; Marta Carballa; Korneel Rabaey; Willy Verstraete
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Electrolytic membrane extraction enables production of fine chemicals from biorefinery sidestreams.

Authors:  Stephen J Andersen; Tom Hennebel; Sylvia Gildemyn; Marta Coma; Joachim Desloover; Jan Berton; Junko Tsukamoto; Christian Stevens; Korneel Rabaey
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Electrochemical resource recovery from digestate to prevent ammonia toxicity during anaerobic digestion.

Authors:  Joachim Desloover; Andualem Abate Woldeyohannis; Willy Verstraete; Nico Boon; Korneel Rabaey
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Analysis of ammonia loss mechanisms in microbial fuel cells treating animal wastewater.

Authors:  Jung Rae Kim; Yi Zuo; John M Regan; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Waste water derived electroactive microbial biofilms: growth, maintenance, and basic characterization.

Authors:  Carla Gimkiewicz; Falk Harnisch
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-12-29       Impact factor: 1.355

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  (Bio)electrochemical ammonia recovery: progress and perspectives.

Authors:  P Kuntke; T H J A Sleutels; M Rodríguez Arredondo; S Georg; S G Barbosa; A Ter Heijne; Hubertus V M Hamelers; C J N Buisman
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  A tartrate-EDTA-Fe complex mediates electron transfer and enhances ammonia recovery in a bioelectrochemical-stripping system.

Authors:  De-Xin Zhang; Si-Yuan Zhai; Ran Zeng; Cheng-Yan Liu; Bo Zhang; Zhe Yu; Li-Hui Yang; Xi-Qi Li; Ya-Nan Hou; Ai-Jie Wang; Hao-Yi Cheng
Journal:  Environ Sci Ecotechnol       Date:  2022-05-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.