Literature DB >> 25650939

Critical examination of the colloidal particle model of globular proteins.

Prasad S Sarangapani1, Steven D Hudson2, Ronald L Jones2, Jack F Douglas2, Jai A Pathak3.   

Abstract

Recent studies of globular protein solutions have uniformly adopted a colloidal view of proteins as particles, a perspective that neglects the polymeric primary structure of these biological macromolecules, their intrinsic flexibility, and their ability to sample a large configurational space. While the colloidal perspective often serves as a useful idealization in many cases, the macromolecular identity of proteins must reveal itself under thermodynamic conditions in which the native state is no longer stable, such as denaturing solvents and high protein concentrations where macromolecules tend to have screened excluded volume, charge, and hydrodynamic interactions. Under extreme pH conditions, charge repulsion interactions within the protein chain can overcome the attractive hydrogen-bonding interactions, holding it in its native globular state. Conformational changes can therefore be expected to have great significance on the shear viscosity and other rheological properties of protein solutions. These changes are not envisioned in conventional colloidal protein models and we have initiated an investigation of the scattering and rheological properties of model proteins. We initiate this effort by considering bovine serum albumin because it is a globular protein whose solution properties have also been extensively investigated as a function of pH, temperature, ionic strength, and concentration. As we anticipated, near-ultraviolet circular dichroism measurements and intrinsic viscosity measurements clearly indicate that the bovine serum albumin tertiary structure changes as protein concentration and pH are varied. Our findings point to limited validity of the colloidal protein model and to the need for further consideration and quantification of the effects of conformational changes on protein solution viscosity, protein association, and the phase behavior. Small-angle Neutron Scattering measurements have allowed us to assess how these conformational changes influence protein size, shape, and interprotein interaction strength.
Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25650939      PMCID: PMC4317558          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.11.3483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  79 in total

1.  Random-coil behavior and the dimensions of chemically unfolded proteins.

Authors:  Jonathan E Kohn; Ian S Millett; Jaby Jacob; Bojan Zagrovic; Thomas M Dillon; Nikolina Cingel; Robin S Dothager; Soenke Seifert; P Thiyagarajan; Tobin R Sosnick; M Zahid Hasan; Vijay S Pande; Ingo Ruczinski; Sebastian Doniach; Kevin W Plaxco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Structural characterization of proteins and complexes using small-angle X-ray solution scattering.

Authors:  Haydyn D T Mertens; Dmitri I Svergun
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.867

3.  Equilibrium cluster formation in concentrated protein solutions and colloids.

Authors:  Anna Stradner; Helen Sedgwick; Frédéric Cardinaux; Wilson C K Poon; Stefan U Egelhaaf; Peter Schurtenberger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Direct determination of phase behavior of square-well fluids.

Authors:  Hongjun Liu; Shekhar Garde; Sanat Kumar
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Self-buffering antibody formulations.

Authors:  Yatin R Gokarn; Eva Kras; Carrie Nodgaard; Vasumathi Dharmavaram; R Matthew Fesinmeyer; Heather Hultgen; Stephen Brych; Richard L Remmele; David N Brems; Susan Hershenson
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.534

6.  Do equilibrium clusters exist in concentrated lysozyme solutions?

Authors:  A Stradner; F Cardinaux; S U Egelhaaf; P Schurtenberger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Viral clearance using disposable systems in monoclonal antibody commercial downstream processing.

Authors:  Joe X Zhou; Felix Solamo; Tony Hong; Michael Shearer; Tim Tressel
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Viscosity of high concentration protein formulations of monoclonal antibodies of the IgG1 and IgG4 subclass - prediction of viscosity through protein-protein interaction measurements.

Authors:  Martin S Neergaard; Devendra S Kalonia; Henrik Parshad; Anders D Nielsen; Eva H Møller; Marco van de Weert
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 4.384

9.  The role of electrostatics in protein-protein interactions of a monoclonal antibody.

Authors:  D Roberts; R Keeling; M Tracka; C F van der Walle; S Uddin; J Warwicker; R Curtis
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Protein aggregation. The effect of deuterium oxide on large protein aggregates of C-phycocyanin.

Authors:  J J Lee; D S Berns
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 3.857

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Molecular basis of high viscosity in concentrated antibody solutions: Strategies for high concentration drug product development.

Authors:  Dheeraj S Tomar; Sandeep Kumar; Satish K Singh; Sumit Goswami; Li Li
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 5.857

2.  Explicit-water theory for the salt-specific effects and Hofmeister series in protein solutions.

Authors:  Yuriy V Kalyuzhnyi; Vojko Vlachy
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Protein aggregation in salt solutions.

Authors:  Miha Kastelic; Yurij V Kalyuzhnyi; Barbara Hribar-Lee; Ken A Dill; Vojko Vlachy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Response to Comment to the Editor.

Authors:  Theodore W Randolph
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Hard Spheres with Purely Repulsive Interactions Have Positive Diffusion Interaction Parameter, kD.

Authors:  Jack F Douglas; Robin Curtis; Prasad S Sarangapani; Steven D Hudson; Ronald L Jones; Jai A Pathak
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  In-silico prediction of concentration-dependent viscosity curves for monoclonal antibody solutions.

Authors:  Dheeraj S Tomar; Li Li; Matthew P Broulidakis; Nicholas G Luksha; Christopher T Burns; Satish K Singh; Sandeep Kumar
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 5.857

7.  Challenges in Predicting Protein-Protein Interactions from Measurements of Molecular Diffusivity.

Authors:  Lea L Sorret; Madison A DeWinter; Daniel K Schwartz; Theodore W Randolph
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  In Silico Prediction of Diffusion Interaction Parameter (kD), a Key Indicator of Antibody Solution Behaviors.

Authors:  Dheeraj S Tomar; Satish K Singh; Li Li; Matthew P Broulidakis; Sandeep Kumar
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 4.200

9.  Rheology of clustering protein solutions.

Authors:  Vishnu L Dharmaraj; P Douglas Godfrin; Yun Liu; Steven D Hudson
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.800

10.  Modeling phase transitions in mixtures of β-γ lens crystallins.

Authors:  Miha Kastelic; Yurij V Kalyuzhnyi; Vojko Vlachy
Journal:  Soft Matter       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 3.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.