Literature DB >> 25650653

An Assessment of 30-Day Complications in Primary Cleft Lip Repair: A Review of the 2012 ACS NSQIP Pediatric.

Kaitlyn M Paine, Youssef Tahiri, Ari M Wes, Jason D Wink, John P Fischer, Carol Ann H Gelder, Jesse A Taylor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to identify risk factors associated with complications and readmissions following cleft lip repair using the multicenter American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Pediatric.
DESIGN: Patients undergoing CPT codes 40700, 40701, and 40702 were extracted from the ACS NSQIP Pediatric. Fisher exact, χ(2), and rank-sum tests were used to evaluate risk factors.
RESULTS: Of the 525 patients included, 4.2% had complications, with respiratory complications being the most common. Risk factors included congenital malformations (P = .001), ventilator dependence (P = .002), oxygen support (P = .016), tracheostomy (P = .005), esophageal/gastric/intestinal disease (P = .007), impaired cognitive status (P = .034), acquired central nervous system abnormality (P = .040), nutritional support (P = .001), major and severe cardiac risk factors (P = .011 and P = .005), and an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3 (P = .002). In addition, complications were associated with undergoing a one-stage bilateral repair (P = .045) or concomitant ear, nose, and throat procedure (P = .045). The readmission rates for ambulatory patients and inpatients were 2.6% and 4.9% (P = .556), with an overall readmission rate of 4.6%. Ambulatory patients were older (P = .005) and had shorter operative times (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative complications are low following cleft lip repair, with respiratory complications being the most common. Readmission rates of 4.6% are higher than expected, and insight into predictors of complications will allow surgeons to identify patients who could benefit from additional resources.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NSQIP Pediatric; ambulatory cleft lip repair; cleft lip; cleft lip repair; complications

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25650653     DOI: 10.1597/14-251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  3 in total

1.  Comparing Plastic Surgery and Otolaryngology Management in Cleft Care: An Analysis of 4,999 Cases.

Authors:  Kevin T Jubbal; Dmitry Zavlin; Shola Olorunnipa; Anthony Echo; Edward P Buchanan; Larry H Hollier
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-04-03

2.  Lower Respiratory Tract Infections and Orofacial Clefts: A Prospective Cohort Study From the Japan Environment and Children's Study.

Authors:  Yukihiro Sato; Eiji Yoshioka; Yasuaki Saijo; Toshinobu Miyamoto; Hiroshi Azuma; Yusuke Tanahashi; Yoshiya Ito; Sumitaka Kobayashi; Machiko Minatoya; Yu Ait Bamai; Keiko Yamazaki; Sachiko Itoh; Chihiro Miyashita; Atsuko Ikeda-Araki; Reiko Kishi
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 3.809

3.  Cleft Lip and Palate Repair Using a Surgical Microscope.

Authors:  Motoi Kato; Azusa Watanabe; Shoji Watanabe; Hiroki Utsunomiya; Takayuki Yokoyama; Shinya Ogishima
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2017-10-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.