Literature DB >> 29109837

Comparing Plastic Surgery and Otolaryngology Management in Cleft Care: An Analysis of 4,999 Cases.

Kevin T Jubbal1, Dmitry Zavlin2, Shola Olorunnipa3, Anthony Echo2, Edward P Buchanan3, Larry H Hollier3.   

Abstract

Care for patients with cleft lip and palate is best managed by a craniofacial team consisting of a variety of specialists, including surgeons, who are generally plastic surgeons or otolaryngologists trained in the United States. The goal of this study was to compare the surgical approaches and management algorithms of cleft lip, cleft palate, and nasal reconstruction between plastic surgeons and otolaryngologists. We performed a retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database between 2012 and 2014 to identify patients undergoing primary repair of cleft lip, cleft palate, and associated rhinoplasty. Two cohorts based on primary specialty, plastic surgeons and otolaryngologists, were compared in relation to patient characteristics, 30-day postoperative outcomes, procedure type, and intraoperative variables. Plastic surgeons performed the majority of surgical repairs, with 85.5% ( n  = 1,472) of cleft lip, 79.3% ( n  = 2,179) of cleft palate, and 87.9% ( n  = 465) of rhinoplasty procedures. There was no difference in the age of primary cleft lip repair or rhinoplasty. However, plastic surgeons performed primary cleft palate repair earlier than otolaryngologists ( p  = 0.03). Procedure type varied between the specialties. In rhinoplasty, otolaryngologists were more likely to use septal or ear cartilage, whereas plastic surgeons preferred rib cartilage. Results were similar, with no statistically significant difference in terms of mortality, reoperation, readmission, or complications. Significant variation exists in the treatment of cleft lip and palate based on specialty service with regard to procedure timing and type. However, short-term rates of mortality, wound occurrence, reoperation, readmission, and surgical or medical complications remain similar.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cleft lip/palate; otolaryngology; outcomes; plastic surgery

Year:  2017        PMID: 29109837      PMCID: PMC5669976          DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1601429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  20 in total

1.  Unilateral cleft lip and palate: Simultaneous early repair of the nose, anterior palate and lip.

Authors:  Louise Caouette Laberge
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2007

2.  Report on cleft lip and palate surgery. Reaction from health professionals has been muted.

Authors:  G Davies
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-05-09

3.  Speech outcome after cleft palate surgery with the Göteborg regimen including delayed hard palate closure.

Authors:  A Lohmander-Agerskov
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg       Date:  1998-03

4.  Parameters for evaluation and treatment of patients with cleft lip/palate or other craniofacial anomalies. American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. March, 1993.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1993-03

Review 5.  Review on genetic variants and maternal smoking in the etiology of oral clefts and other birth defects.

Authors:  Min Shi; George L Wehby; Jeffrey C Murray
Journal:  Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today       Date:  2008-03

6.  Cleft lip and palate treatment of 530 children over a decade in a single centre.

Authors:  I M Vlastos; E Koudoumnakis; M Houlakis; M Nasika; M Griva; E Stylogianni
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 1.675

Review 7.  Facial growth of adults with unoperated clefts.

Authors:  Pradip R Shetye
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.017

8.  Cleft palate surgery: an evaluation of length of stay, complications, and costs by hospital type.

Authors:  Christine Nguyen; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Sheryl M Davies; Jay Bhattacharya; Rohit K Khosla; Catherine M Curtin
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2013-09-24

Review 9.  MOC-PS(SM) CME article: late cleft lip nasal deformity.

Authors:  Bahman Guyuron
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 10.  MOC-PSSM CME article: Nonsyndromic cleft palate.

Authors:  John A van Aalst; Kamal Kumar Kolappa; Michael Sadove
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.