Literature DB >> 25650507

The Ebbinghaus illusion: new contextual effects and theoretical considerations.

Ted Jaeger1, Kyle Klahs.   

Abstract

Current accounts of the Ebbinghaus illusion emphasize either size contrast or contour interaction processes. To assess these alternatives, four variants of the Ebbinghaus figure were constructed using 1, 5, 9, or 13 small circles dispersed along the perimeter of larger contextual circles. 30 observers ranked the perceived size of the central circles and a single control circle. The rankings indicated that increasing the number of small circles reduced the perceived size of the central circle. The results parallel the effects of contextual arcs on the Ebbinghaus illusion and suggest that the mis-estimations of central circle size in Ebbinghaus figures result primarily from contour interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25650507     DOI: 10.2466/24.27.PMS.120v13x4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Mot Skills        ISSN: 0031-5125


  4 in total

1.  The Ebbinghaus illusion with small inducers appears larger on the right side.

Authors:  Ayako Saneyoshi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Perceptual similarity and the neural correlates of geometrical illusions in human brain structure.

Authors:  Vadim Axelrod; D Samuel Schwarzkopf; Sharon Gilaie-Dotan; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The combination of target motion and dynamic changes in context greatly enhance visual size illusions.

Authors:  Ryan E B Mruczek; Matthew Fanelli; Sean Kelly; Gideon P Caplovitz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 3.473

4.  Perceptual grouping leads to objecthood effects in the Ebbinghaus illusion.

Authors:  Einat Rashal; Aline F Cretenoud; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.