Literature DB >> 25649519

CLOCK CHART(®): a novel multi-stimulus self-check visual field screener.

Chota Matsumoto1, Mariko Eura, Sachiko Okuyama, Sonoko Takada, Eiko Arimura-Koike, Shigeki Hashimoto, Fumi Tanabe, Yoshikazu Shimomura.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: CLOCK CHART(®) is a multi-stimulus-type self-check visual field screening sheet developed by our group. The test chart is rotated during the examination, and the visual field abnormalities are pointed out by the patients themselves. In this study, we evaluated the clinical usefulness of this chart in patients with glaucoma.
METHODS: We studied 114 eyes of 114 glaucoma patients (average age 60.0 ± 11.1 years) and 45 eyes of 45 normal individuals (average age 45.0 ± 16.4 years) using CLOCK CHART(®). The static visual fields were obtained using the Octopus 101 G2 program and classified using the Aulhorn classification as modified by Greve (stages 0-I to IV) and by mean defect (MD; early <6 dB; moderate 6 ≤ MD ≤12 dB; severe >12 dB).The sensitivity and specificity of CLOCK CHART(®) for detecting visual field abnormalities were evaluated within the entire 25° field and at the 5°, 10°, 15°, 20°, and 25° eccentricity zones. The visual field agreement between the results of CLOCK CHART(®) and the static visual fields were also evaluated.
RESULTS: In glaucomatous eyes, the sensitivity of CLOCK CHART(®) was 85, 93, and 100 % for Greve stages I, II and III-VI, respectively, and 87, 93, and 97 % for the MD value in early, moderate, and severe eyes, respectively. The agreement of the visual field defect area in CLOCK CHART(®) with the static fields was 85 and 100 % with Greve stages 0-I to I and II-VI, respectively, and 91, 96, and 96 % in early, moderate and severe glaucomatous eyes according to MD, respectively. The specificity of CLOCK CHART(®) was 89 %.
CONCLUSION: CLOCK CHART(®) is a simple and reliable self-check screening chart for detecting visual field abnormalities in patients with glaucoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25649519     DOI: 10.1007/s10384-014-0368-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0021-5155            Impact factor:   2.447


  4 in total

1.  How does glaucoma look?: patient perception of visual field loss.

Authors:  David P Crabb; Nicholas D Smith; Fiona C Glen; Robyn Burton; David F Garway-Heath
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese: the Tajimi Study.

Authors:  Aiko Iwase; Yasuyuki Suzuki; Makoto Araie; Tetsuya Yamamoto; Haruki Abe; Shiroaki Shirato; Yasuaki Kuwayama; Hiromu K Mishima; Hiroyuki Shimizu; Goji Tomita; Yoichi Inoue; Yoshiaki Kitazawa
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Subjective detection of visual field defects using home TV set.

Authors:  S Shirato; M Adachi; T Hara
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  The usefulness of the Noise-Field Test as a screening method for visual field defects.

Authors:  M Adachi; S Shirato
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.447

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  The effect of concentric constriction of the visual field to 10 and 15 degrees on simulated motor vehicle accidents.

Authors:  Sachiko Udagawa; Shinji Ohkubo; Aiko Iwase; Yuto Susuki; Shiho Kunimatsu-Sanuki; Takeo Fukuchi; Chota Matsumoto; Yuko Ohno; Hiroshi Ono; Kazuhisa Sugiyama; Makoto Araie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Development of Visual Field Screening Procedures: A Case Study of the Octopus Perimeter.

Authors:  Andrew Turpin; Jonathan S Myers; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.283

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.