J F Sumowski1,2, M A Rocca3,4, V M Leavitt5, G Riccitelli3, J Sandry1,2, J DeLuca1,2, G Comi4, M Filippi3,4. 1. Neuropsychology and Neuroscience, Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ, USA. 2. Rutgers, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA. 3. Neuroimaging Research Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. 4. Department of Neurology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. 5. Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Active engagement in intellectually enriching activities (e.g. reading, hobbies) builds 'reserve' against memory decline in elders and persons with multiple sclerosis (MS), but the neural basis for this protective influence of enrichment is unknown. Herein the neuroanatomical basis of reserve against memory decline in MS patients is investigated. METHODS: Relapse-onset MS patients (N = 187) underwent 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging of the brain to quantify T2 lesion volume (T2LV) and normalized volumes of total brain, total white, total grey (using SIENAX) and thalamus, caudate, putamen, pallidum, amygdala and hippocampus (using FIRST). Patients completed a survey quantifying their engagement in early life intellectual enrichment (i.e. reading, hobbies). Verbal and visuospatial episodic memory was assessed with neuropsychological tasks in a representative subsample (N = 97). RESULTS: Controlling for demographics and T2LV, intellectual enrichment was specifically linked to larger normalized hippocampal volume (r(p) = 0.213, P = 0.004), with no link to other brain volumes/structures. Moreover, greater intellectual enrichment moderated/attenuated the negative relationship between normalized total brain volume (i.e. overall cerebral atrophy) and normalized hippocampal volume (i.e. hippocampal atrophy; P = 0.001) whereby patients who engaged in more early life intellectual enrichment better maintained hippocampal volume in the face of worse overall cerebral atrophy. Finally, the link between greater intellectual enrichment and better memory was partially mediated through larger hippocampal volume. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support larger hippocampal volume as one key component of the neuroanatomical basis of reserve against memory decline in MS. These findings are consistent with previous literature on experience-dependent neuroplasticity within the hippocampus.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Active engagement in intellectually enriching activities (e.g. reading, hobbies) builds 'reserve' against memory decline in elders and persons with multiple sclerosis (MS), but the neural basis for this protective influence of enrichment is unknown. Herein the neuroanatomical basis of reserve against memory decline in MSpatients is investigated. METHODS: Relapse-onset MSpatients (N = 187) underwent 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging of the brain to quantify T2 lesion volume (T2LV) and normalized volumes of total brain, total white, total grey (using SIENAX) and thalamus, caudate, putamen, pallidum, amygdala and hippocampus (using FIRST). Patients completed a survey quantifying their engagement in early life intellectual enrichment (i.e. reading, hobbies). Verbal and visuospatial episodic memory was assessed with neuropsychological tasks in a representative subsample (N = 97). RESULTS: Controlling for demographics and T2LV, intellectual enrichment was specifically linked to larger normalized hippocampal volume (r(p) = 0.213, P = 0.004), with no link to other brain volumes/structures. Moreover, greater intellectual enrichment moderated/attenuated the negative relationship between normalized total brain volume (i.e. overall cerebral atrophy) and normalized hippocampal volume (i.e. hippocampal atrophy; P = 0.001) whereby patients who engaged in more early life intellectual enrichment better maintained hippocampal volume in the face of worse overall cerebral atrophy. Finally, the link between greater intellectual enrichment and better memory was partially mediated through larger hippocampal volume. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support larger hippocampal volume as one key component of the neuroanatomical basis of reserve against memory decline in MS. These findings are consistent with previous literature on experience-dependent neuroplasticity within the hippocampus.
Authors: Declan T Chard; Jonathan S Jackson; David H Miller; Claudia A M Wheeler-Kingshott Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: James F Sumowski; Glenn R Wylie; Victoria M Leavitt; Nancy D Chiaravalloti; John DeLuca Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2012-06-08 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: N L Sicotte; K C Kern; B S Giesser; A Arshanapalli; A Schultz; M Montag; H Wang; S Y Bookheimer Journal: Brain Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Jacob B Leary; Grace Y Kim; Catherine L Bradley; Uzma Z Hussain; Maryanne Sacco; Martha Bernad; John Collins; John Dsurney; Leighton Chan Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2018 Jan/Feb Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: Fei Gao; Xuntao Yin; Richard A E Edden; Alan C Evans; Junhai Xu; Guanmei Cao; Honghao Li; Muwei Li; Bin Zhao; Jian Wang; Guangbin Wang Journal: Hippocampus Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 3.899
Authors: James F Sumowski; Maria A Rocca; Victoria M Leavitt; Gianna Riccitelli; Alessandro Meani; Giancarlo Comi; Massimo Filippi Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2016-02-26 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Tamsyn E Van Rheenen; Vanessa Cropley; Andrew Zalesky; Chad Bousman; Ruth Wells; Jason Bruggemann; Suresh Sundram; Danielle Weinberg; Roshel K Lenroot; Avril Pereira; Cynthia Shannon Weickert; Thomas W Weickert; Christos Pantelis Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 9.306