| Literature DB >> 25648062 |
Sungjoon Lee1, Chun Kee Chung2, Chi Heon Kim3.
Abstract
Study Design Retrospective study. Objectives To analyze lamina hinge fusion failure after plate-only open-door laminoplasty. Methods Thirty-one patients who underwent plate-only open-door laminoplasty (110 levels) for cervical myelopathy and who had serial computed tomography (CT) scans at 6 and 12 months were analyzed. Risk factors for fusion failure at 12 months were analyzed, including age, sex, smoking, presence of diabetes mellitus and ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament, bone mineral density (T-score), preoperative cervical curvature, operated levels, presence of a ventral cortical bony continuity, and reflection angle of the lamina hinge. Clinical outcomes were assessed with neck pain score using visual analog scale, neck disability index, and Japanese Orthopedic Association score. Results Hinge fusion occurred in 84% (26/31) of patients at 12 months. A significant risk factor for fusion failure was the absence of a ventral cortical bony continuity at 6 months (p < 0.01; 100 versus 48%). No lamina with ventral cortical bony continuity at 6 months showed depression at 12 months, but two lamina without continuity showed depression of 2.5 and 2.1 mm, respectively, at 12 months. Clinical outcomes were not different between patients with and without hinge fusion. Conclusion Absence of a ventral cortical bony continuity at 6 months is a risk factor for fusion failure at 12 months. However, bicortically defective laminae usually heal with minimal displacement, although it may take longer than 12 months.Entities:
Keywords: cervical vertebra; fusion; laminoplasty; myelopathy; plate
Year: 2014 PMID: 25648062 PMCID: PMC4303478 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1394128
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Global Spine J ISSN: 2192-5682
Fig. 1Computed tomography showing fusion and nonfusion of the hinge. Fusion was defined as (A) cortical bony continuity at both ventral and dorsal lamina or (B) callus formation and bony bridge (arrow) at both ventral and dorsal lamina. Only ventral cortical bony continuity (C) or no bony continuity (D) was defined as nonfusion.
Fig. 2Depression of the lamina. This lamina showed ventral cortical bony discontinuity at 6 months. It is fused at 12 months and is depressed 2.1 mm. Note that both dorsal and ventral cortical linings are disrupted (arrow).
Comparison of patient characteristics between hinge fusion group and nonfusion group at 12 months
| Factors | Fused ( | Nonfused ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 62.6 ± 9.9 | 68.0 ± 7.5 | 0.28 |
| Sex (male) | 20 (77%) | 3 (60%) | 0.58 |
| DM | 1 (4%) | 1 (20%) | 0.30 |
| Smoking | 10 (38%) | 2 (40%) | >0.99 |
| OPLL | 17 (65%) | 1 (20%) | 0.13 |
| BMD (T-score) | −0.1 ± 1.3 | −0.9 ± 1.2 | 0.31 |
| Preoperative CC | 9.7 ± 5.2 degrees | 10.4 ± 3.8 degrees | 0.62 |
| Number of LP | 3.5 ± 0.8 | 3.6 ± 1.1 | 0.90 |
| Ventral cortical bony discontinuity at 6 mo | 4 (15%) | 5 (100%) | <0.01 |
Abbreviations: BMD, bone mineral density; CC, cervical curvature; DM, diabetes mellitus; LP, laminoplasty; OPLL, ossified posterior longitudinal ligament.
No patient showed kyphotic cervical curvature preoperatively.
Patient who had any lamina with ventral cortical bony discontinuity at hinge side on computed tomography scan at 6 months was counted.
Comparison of hinge fusion rate of 110 laminae at 6 and 12 months after laminoplasty according to the presence of ventral cortical bony continuity at 6 month
| 6 mo | 12 mo | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fusion | No fusion | Fusion rate (%) | Fusion | No fusion | Fusion rate (%) | |
| Ventral cortical bony continuity (+) | 87 | 2 | 97 | 89 | 0 | 100 |
| Ventral cortical bony continuity (−) | 1 | 20 | 5 | 10 | 11 | 48 |
| Overall | 88 | 22 | 80 | 99 | 11 | 90 |
Risk factor analysis of the absence of ventral cortical bony continuity at 6 months in 110 operated laminae
| Factors | Yes ( | No ( | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | Odds ratio (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age >70 y | 15 (71%) | 21 (24%) | <0.01 | <0.01 | 6.6 (2.2–19.7) |
| Sex (male) | 13 (62%) | 63 (71%) | 0.44 | ||
| DM | 1 (5%) | 5 (6%) | >0.99 | ||
| Smoking | 8 (38%) | 29 (33%) | 0.63 | ||
| OPLL | 7 (33%) | 61 (69%) | <0.01 | 0.04 | 0.3 (0.1–0.9) |
| Laminoplasty levels | 3.8 ± 0.8 | 3.8 ± 0.8 | 0.77 | ||
| BMD (T-score) | −0.3 ± 1.4 | −0.3 ± 1.4 | 0.99 | ||
| Reflection angle (degrees) | 30.9 ± 10.8 | 37.4 ± 12.9 | 0.04 |
Abbreviations: BMD, bone marrow density; CI, confidence interval; DM, diabetes mellitus; OPLL, ossified posterior longitudinal ligament.
Note: Yes = absence of ventral cortical bony continuity; No = presence of ventral cortical bony continuity.
Clinical outcome comparison according to the hinge fusion status at postoperative 6 and 12 months
| Postoperative 6 mo | Postoperative 12 mo | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fusion ( | No fusion ( |
| Fusion ( | No fusion ( |
| |
| VAS-neck (10 points) | 2.4 ± 1.7 | 3.3 ± 2.0 | 0.29 | 2.1 ± 2.0 | 1.8 ± 2.1 | 0.80 |
| NDI (50 points) | 13.1 ± 8.2 | 15.3 ± 13.6 | 0.61 | 10.6 ± 7.1 | 16.4 ± 15.9 | 0.44 |
| JOA recovery rate (%) | 50 ± 39.3 | 55.6 ± 33.3 | 0.63 | 75 ± 38.9 | 16.7 ± 33.2 | 0.10 |
Abbreviations: JOA, Japanese Orthopedic Association; NDI, neck disability index; VAS-neck, visual analogue pain scale on neck.
Expressed in median ± standard deviation.
Fig. 3A 74-year old man complaining of weakness in both lower legs visited our clinic. (A) Cervical magnetic resonance imaging shows spinal canal stenosis with cord signal change at C4–6 level. (B) The segmental type of ossified posterior longitudinal ligament was observed at level C5–6 vertebral bodies. (C, D) Compared with preoperative simple lateral X-ray image, the anterior-posterior diameter of spinal canal was increased postoperatively. (E, F, G) At 6-month computed tomography (CT) scan, the C6 lamina was fused but the C4–5 laminae were not fused, without both dorsal and ventral cortical bony continuity at the hinges. (H, I, J) A 12-month CT scan showed fused C4 hinge-side lamina with definitely visible callous bone formation. The hinge of C5 lamina showed callous bone formation, but bony bridge was not clear and this lamina was regarded as nonfused. No interval change of the C6 lamina was observed.