Literature DB >> 25647512

Long-term efficacy of systemic multiexon skipping targeting dystrophin exons 45-55 with a cocktail of vivo-morpholinos in mdx52 mice.

Yusuke Echigoya1, Yoshitsugu Aoki2, Bailey Miskew1, Dharminder Panesar1, Aleksander Touznik1, Tetsuya Nagata3, Jun Tanihata3, Akinori Nakamura4, Kanneboyina Nagaraju5, Toshifumi Yokota6.   

Abstract

Antisense-mediated exon skipping, which can restore the reading frame, is a most promising therapeutic approach for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Remaining challenges include the limited applicability to patients and unclear function of truncated dystrophin proteins. Multiexon skipping targeting exons 45-55 at the mutation hotspot of the dystrophin gene could overcome both of these challenges. Previously, we described the feasibility of exons 45-55 skipping with a cocktail of Vivo-Morpholinos in vivo; however, the long-term efficacy and safety of Vivo-Morpholinos remains to be determined. In this study, we examined the efficacy and toxicity of exons 45-55 skipping by intravenous injections of 6 mg/kg 10-Vivo-Morpholino cocktail (0.6 mg/kg each vPMO) every 2 weeks for 18 weeks to dystrophic exon-52 knockout (mdx52) mice. Systemic skipping of the entire exons 45-55 region was induced, and the Western blot analysis exhibited the restoration of 5-27% of normal levels of dystrophin protein in skeletal muscles, accompanied by improvements in histopathology and muscle strength. No obvious immune response and renal and hepatic toxicity were detected at the end-point of the treatment. We demonstrate our new regimen with the 10-Vivo-Morpholino cocktail is effective and safe for long-term repeated systemic administration in the dystrophic mouse model.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 25647512      PMCID: PMC4345310          DOI: 10.1038/mtna.2014.76

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids        ISSN: 2162-2531            Impact factor:   10.183


Introduction

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is the most common form of muscular dystrophy, a heterogeneous group of more than 30 genetic disorders characterized by progressive muscle degeneration and weakness.[1] DMD with severe muscle pathology is a fatal X-linked disorder that affects ~1 in every 3,600 live male births.[2,3] Although DMD is caused by various types of mutations in the dystrophin (DMD) gene, such as deletion, duplication, and nonsense mutations, most patients with DMD have out-of-frame deletion mutations (~65%).[4,5,6] Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD), a milder form of dystrophin deficiency,[7] mostly results from deletion mutations (~82% of patients) that do not affect the reading frame (in-frame mutations).[4,5,6] The resulting in-frame transcripts permit the expression of internally shortened but partially functional proteins.[8] Currently, antisense oligonucleotide (AO)–mediated exon skipping, which can restore the disrupted reading frame by excluding the targeted exon(s), is one of the most promising approaches for the treatment of DMD.[9,10,11,12,13] The aim of exon-skipping therapy for DMD is to slow the disease progression by converting severe DMD symptoms to the milder symptoms seen in patients with BMD. One major challenge to this technique is the fact that individual exons in the DMD gene need to be targeted by specifically tailored AOs to cover the majority of patients; thus, the therapy may have limited applicability.[14,15,16] Another challenge is that the function and stability of each of the resulting short dystrophin proteins are unclear.[17] To overcome these issues, many investigations of multiexon skipping have been conducted in preclinical trials with dystrophic animal models and DMD patient cell lines.[18] In particular, multiexon skipping that targets exons 45–55 at the mutation hotspot of the DMD gene has the potential to greatly expand the applicability of exon skipping therapy for DMD patients and produce more stable/functional truncated dystrophin protein. An in-frame mutation that lacks the entire exons 45–55 region has been associated with a milder or almost asymptomatic phenotype in 95% or more of BMD patients with this type of mutation.[19,20] This observation prompted us to investigate multiexon skipping of this entire region. In theory, ~63% of DMD patients with deletion mutations and 45% of all DMD patients could be rescued by skipping the exon 45–55 region according to the Universal Mutation Database (UMD)-DMD database.[19] Typically, skipping multiple exons is more technically challenging and less efficient than targeting single exons. A new-generation morpholino, the Vivo-Morpholino (vPMO), which possesses a cell-penetrating octaguanidinium dendrimer, has been reported to improve the efficiency of exon skipping.[21,22,23,24,25] Recently, we described a 10-vPMO cocktail (12 mg/kg every 2 weeks) that efficiently induces multiple skipping of exons 45–55 both in vitro and in vivo in dystrophic exon-52 knockout (mdx52) mice.[26,27] Long-term efficacy and safety of the vPMO cocktail, including recovery of dystrophin-associated proteins (DAPs) and immune response, remain to be determined in the systemic treatment. Patients treated systemically with AO-mediated exon skipping therapy will require repeated administration of AO drugs throughout their lifetime in order to maintain the therapeutic effects. Lower concentrations of AOs that achieve sufficient exon skipping may prevent potential off-target effects associated with long-term systemic treatment. In this study, we examined the long-term efficacy and safety of multiple exon skipping with a cocktail of vPMOs that target exons 45–51 and 53–55. We demonstrate that nine systemic injections of the cocktail every 2 weeks at a relatively low dose of 6 mg/kg induced bodywide expression of dystrophin and DAPs in the dystrophic skeletal muscles of mdx52 mice, accompanied by an improvement in pathology, functional recovery, and no detectable immune response and renal and hepatic toxicity by blood tests.

Results

Local injection with the 10-vPMO cocktail at 0.3 μg skips the entire exons 45–55 of dystrophin transcript in the tibialis anterior muscle of mdx52 mice

To validate the efficacy of exon 45–55 skipping with the vPMO cocktail at a lower dose (a total of 0.3 μg of vPMOs, 0.03 μg of each) than the previous 1.5 μg,[26] we first injected the cocktail into the tibialis anterior (TA) muscles of 8-week-old mdx52 mice (Supplementary Figure S1). AO sequences used are listed in . An intended skipped mRNA band of 243 bp was detected by reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) in the TA muscles 2 weeks after an intramuscular injection with the vPMO cocktail. Sequence analysis showed the boundary of exons 44 and 56, confirming that the entire exons 45–55 region had been removed. In addition to the intended skipped mRNA, intermediate dystrophin mRNAs in which some of the exons were removed were also observed in the nontreated and vPMO-treated samples. These intermediate transcripts were composed of both out-of-frame and in-frame transcripts. In immunohistochemistry with anti-dystrophin DYS1 and P7 antibodies, using a lower dose (0.3 μg), we induced more than 50% of dystrophin positive fibers in treated TA muscle, as well as our previous report with a vPMO cocktail at 1.5 μg.

Long-term systemic and repeated injections of the 10-vPMO cocktail induce exon 45–55 skipping and expression of dystrophin and its associated proteins in bodywide skeletal muscles

Next, we examined the exon skipping efficacy of systemic injections with the vPMO cocktail. We performed nine consecutive intravenous injections of the vPMO cocktail, at 6 mg/kg total per injection (0.6 mg/kg for each vPMO) at 2-week intervals, into 8-week-old mdx52 mice. The experimental term and injection frequency in the systemic treatment were almost twice as much as our preceding study, while the total dosage of 54 mg/kg remained similar to the previously tested dosage.[26] Treated mice did not show any abnormal behavior after the intravenous injections. RT-PCR analysis showed exons 45–55 skipped transcripts averaged 3.5–22.7% in muscles bodywide, including the heart, at 2 weeks after the final injection (). The exon 44 and 56 junction of the intended band was then confirmed by direct sequencing (data not shown). Various intermediate PCR products including out-of-frame and in-frame sequences were observed in different patterns between tissue types and/or individuals after the systemic treatment as well as the intramuscular injection. We also detected dystrophin-positive fibers in all of the skeletal muscles examined by immunohistochemistry with P7 primary antibody (). Western blotting revealed that dystrophin expression levels in all of the tested skeletal muscles averaged 5–27% compared to normal levels in samples from wild-type (WT) mice (). Expression levels of induced dystrophin proteins as well as the expression pattern of the skipped mRNAs varied among different positions within a given muscle sample and among different muscle types. Unlike in the skeletal muscles, immunohistochemistry and Western blotting, respectively, revealed that there were fewer dystrophin-positive fibers and less expression of dystrophin protein (≤2.3% that of WT mice) in the heart muscle after long-term systemic vPMO treatment (,). In immunohistochemistry with serial sections from biceps femoris (BF) and gastrocnemius (GC) muscles of the treated mice, we observed recovery of DAPs: α1-syntrophin, neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS), α-sarcoglycan, and β-dystroglycan in the dystrophin positive fibers 2 weeks after the last administration with the vPMO cocktail ().

Systemic long-term treatment using the vPMO cocktail improves histology and muscle function in mdx52 mice without inducing detectable immunoreaction

Compared to nontreated muscles, we observed less muscle degeneration and fewer cellular infiltrations in the diaphragm (DIA), BF, quadriceps (QUA), GC, and TA muscles after long-term systemic vPMO cocktail treatment (). We next evaluated detailed histological changes in the muscles of treated mice compared with those in nontreated mice. The percentage of centrally nucleated fibers (CNFs), which is indicative of degeneration/regeneration cycles, was significantly reduced in the DIA, BF, QUA, GC, and TA muscle of the treated mdx52 mice compared to the nontreated mice, indicating an amelioration of muscle pathology (). To examine immunoglobulin (Ig) accumulation in dystrophic muscle fibers, which is a hallmark of necrotic fibers due to leaky muscle membranes in DMD patients and mdx mice,[28] immunostaining with IgG antibody was performed (). Increased IgG signals were observed in endo- and perimysium of DIA, BF, QUA, and HRT of the nontreated and treated mice. The signal intensity and the number of IgG-positive fibers, although not statistically significant (P = 0.32 in BF and P = 0.39 in QUA, n = 4 in NT and n = 6 in treated group), were reduced in the treated mice group, indicating improved muscle pathology by the systemic treatment with the vPMO cocktail. Significant improvement in maximum hindlimb grip force was observed in treated mdx52 mice compared to nontreated mdx52 mice (), although the improvement in the forelimb was not significant (data not shown). To investigate an immune response to long-term administration of the vPMO cocktail, we observed changes in the number of CD3-positive T cells (). Although an increase of CD3-positive cells was found in DIA, BF, QUA, and HRT in both nontreated and treated mice, there was no significant difference in the number of CD3-positive cells between the treated and nontreated mice ().

Serum biochemical parameters for renal and liver functions are not significantly altered by long-term systemic treatment with the 10-vPMO cocktail

To investigate the potential toxicity of long-term systemic injections of the 10-vPMO cocktail, serum biochemical parameters were tested and statistically analyzed among the groups at the end-point, which was 2 weeks after the final injection (). A reduction in serum creatine kinase (CK) level, an indicator of muscle damage, was accompanied by histological and functional recovery, but this result did not reach the level of significance. The level of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) in the treated mice was significantly reduced to a level equivalent to that in WT mice. Levels of creatine (Cre), total bilirubin (T-bil), and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GTP), a more specific indicator of liver lesions than aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) affected by muscle lesions,[26,29,30] were not significantly changed by the long-term treatment. Thus, renal and hepatic toxicity were not detected in the mdx52 mice after nine consecutive injections of the 10-vPMO cocktail at 2-week intervals.

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated the feasibility of skipping exons 45–55 in their entirety, which is the mutation hotspot region in the dystrophin gene, and rescued expression of dystrophin and DAPs over 18 weeks without any detectable immune response or nephro- and hepatotoxicity in the blood test after nine intravenous injections of the 10-vPMO cocktail at a low concentration of 6 mg/kg. These results indicate that our new regimen for long-term treatment with the vPMO cocktail at 6 mg/kg can safely achieve therapeutic effects similar to our previous study with a dose of 12 mg/kg.[26] Antisense-mediated exon skipping targeting a single exon is currently close to clinical application for the treatment of DMD, but the multiexon skipping strategy is still far from the clinical trial stage, due to the limited amount of information yielded thus far by preclinical trials.[18] To date, several clinical trials of exon skipping using unmodified morpholinos and 2'O-methylated phosphorothioates (2'OMePSs) are ongoing for DMD. A phase 1/2 clinical trial of exon 44 skipping has been completed and skipping of exons 45 and 53 is being investigated in a phase 1/2a clinical trial conducted by Prosensa (http://www.prosensa.eu/). The exon-skipping phase 3 trial, which targets exon 51 with a 2'OMePS AO, is ongoing.[13] Sarepta Therapeutics is currently conducting a phase 2b clinical trial of exon 51 skipping with a morpholino,[12] while Nippon Shinyaku has started a phase 1 trial of exon 53 skipping (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry number UMIN000010964). Although these targeted exons comprise portions of the hotspot region, skipping of exons 44, 45, 51, and 53 would be applicable to only 6.2% (8.8%), 8.2% (11.8%), 13.0% (19.1%), and 7.7% (11.4%) of all DMD patients (patients with deletion mutations), respectively.[16] In addition to the limitations of therapeutic coverage, another concern is that single exon skipping therapy produces distinct truncated dystrophin proteins depending on patient-specific mutation patterns; this raises a concern that ongoing skipping strategies may not always induce stable/functional dystrophin proteins. By contrast, more than 95% of patients in whom exons 45–55 are deleted in their entirety are reported to have milder BMD symptoms or are asymptomatic.[19,20] BMD is caused by a reduction in the amount functional dystrophin protein.[31] This fact suggests that truncated proteins that lack this specific region are more stable and functionally able to protect muscle tissue from deterioration. It is worth noting that multiexon skipping targeting exons 45–55 would cover ~63% of DMD patients with deletion mutations, according to the UMD-DMD database.[19] Aartsma-Rus's group first tested the concept of skipping of the hotspot region with 2'OMePS cocktails in DMD patient cell lines.[32] Unfortunately, this trial did not achieve sufficient skipping of the intended exons and dystrophin expression. Recently, we demonstrated proof of concept for skipping exons 45–55 with a cocktail of vPMOs; effective expression of dystrophin protein was induced after five consecutive systemic injections at 12 mg/kg every 2 weeks.[26] Positively charged vPMOs have higher cell membrane permeability and improved delivery into muscle fibers. One concern is that vPMOs might have a narrower therapeutic window due to their chemical feature, compared to uncharged morpholinos. Long-term low-dose therapy could be an excellent solution to overcome this limitation. Thus, this therapeutic strategy has potential for the treatment of ~30 and 45% of all DMD patients based on the LOVD and the UMD-DMD database, respectively.[19,33] New-generation morpholinos, such as cell-penetrating peptide-conjugated PMOs (PPMOs) and vPMOs, are reported to enable high-efficiency exon skipping at lower doses than unmodified morpholinos and 2'OMePSs.[22,24,27,34] In a previous study, five administrations of a vPMO at a low dose of 6 mg/kg were more effective than a single bolus administration at 30 mg/kg in the mdx mouse model.[24] Moreover, intravenous injections every 2 weeks of a PPMO at a dose of 6 mg/kg for 1 year achieved successful dystrophin expression in body-wide skeletal muscles in the mdx mouse.[35] In this study, we employed a relatively low dose of 0.6 mg/kg of each vPMO (6 mg/kg in total) and found that long-term treatment with nine injections of the 10-vPMO cocktail at 2-week intervals successfully induced expression of mRNA in which exons 45–55 had been skipped; the result was recovery of dystrophin and DAPs body-wide in mdx52 mice. Although there were variations in the distribution and expression levels of the skipped dystrophin mRNA/proteins among the different muscle types and/or within positions of a given muscle, and no significant reduction in creatine kinase levels in the treated-mouse group, the amelioration of skeletal muscle pathology and functional recovery that we observed provide evidence of the therapeutic effects of the regimen. Another concern was that very little dystrophin protein was detected in the heart muscle (≤1% that of WT mice), even though exons 45–55 skipped mRNA was detected by RT-PCR in heart tissue from treated mice. The lower expression of dystrophin protein may be attributed to differences in the posttranscriptional processing for dystrophin generated in skeletal muscle compared to heart muscle. This is supported by a recent study that dystrophin expression level in the heart is higher than in the skeletal muscles and that mutated dystrophin transcripts are less stable than normal transcripts.[36] This could include the rate of decay for the AO-induced dystrophin mRNA and protein, because effective exon skipping in the heart muscle of transgenic mice, which bear target human β-globin intron, has been reported with four intravenous injections of a vPMO at 12.5 mg/kg/day for 4 days as well as in other tissues, including skeletal muscle.[21] Neither bolus nor repeated intravenous/intraperitoneal administration of a vPMO at doses from 15 mg/kg to 30 mg/kg resulted in similar levels of dystrophin mRNA and protein produced in heart muscle compared to skeletal muscles.[24,25] A similar tendency was reported in studies in which 2'OMePSs, morpholinos, and PPMOs were administered to mdx mice;[30,35,37,38,39] moreover, this tendency was also seen in mdx mice subjected to adenoassociated virus-mediated exon skipping.[40] In addition, distinct cellular trafficking systems for AOs between skeletal muscle cells and cardiac cells may affect the efficiency of AO-mediated exon skipping in these tissues.[41] Although the processing mechanism of dystrophin transcripts and AO delivery system will need to be more thoroughly characterized in order to increase protein expression, it is encouraging to note that as little as 1–2% dystrophin protein expression in the heart muscle improves cardiac function and pathology in mdx mice.[30,42] A remaining challenge facing the new-generation morpholinos is that there is still insufficient information available about their toxicity. As described above, thus far, frequent systemic intravenous injections at a dose of 6 mg/kg of a single vPMO and PPMO for long-term therapy seem to be an effective regimen with no potential adverse effects in mdx mice, which is a rationale for the evaluation of efficacy and safety of the 10-vPMO cocktail at 6 mg/kg in this study.[24,35] Lethal toxicity emerges following single intravenous administration at a dose of 60 mg/kg PPMO in the mdx mouse, and 30 mg/kg PPMO systemic injections also cause transient activity reduction in treated mice, indicating potential off-target effects.[35] In nonhuman primates treated by systemic injections with PPMO at 9 mg/kg for 4 weeks, mild tubular degeneration in the kidney has been reported.[34] Although it is speculated that acute lethality/abnormal behavior after an intravenous injection with vPMOs may be caused by multimers clustered by hybridization between their sequences,[43] no overt toxicity due to the chemical components of vPMO was recorded at up to 15–20 mg/kg in mice.[25,44] However, the presence of dose-dependent and delayed side effects by long-term treatment must be determined to use this chemistry as a clinical grade. Neither the current 18-week regimen of 6 mg/kg vPMOs (0.6 mg/kg each vPMO) every 2 weeks, nor the previous study using the vPMO cocktail at a higher dose of 12 mg/kg, lead to any deterioration of the serum parameters that were tested.[26] Notably, we found a significant reduction in BUN, an indicator of progression of protein catabolism, to the normal range observed in WT mice. Mussini et al. also have shown that catabolism in DMD muscles is increased.[45] A relatively higher level of BUN is reported in mdx mice compared with WT C57BL/6 mice.[46] The reduced BUN level with no significant change in the creatinine level may result from amelioration of muscle degeneration by the treatment. In addition, we confirmed that our vPMO cocktail does not induce a detectable immune response of T cells. Although pathological and immunological side effects for long-term treatment with vPMOs need to be more closely examined in various tissue types of animal models, these results indicate that this regimen may have clinical potential for DMD patients who require repeated administration over the course of their lifetime. In summary, we demonstrated that long-term repeated intravenous injections of the 10-vPMO cocktail at a lower dose than described previously was both effective and safe in the DMD animal model. However, further investigations of vPMO cocktails will need to be conducted at the preclinical stage, such as dose-escalation and -reduction studies, as well as acute and chronic toxicity assessments, since multiexon skipping has more potential for off-target effects due to the repeated administration of many different AOs. Intermediate products induced by AO cocktails also should be considered a potential side effect, as shown in this study. Multiexon skipping with a number of AOs is likely to generate a variety of dystrophin mRNA/protein types including in-frame and out-of-frame transcripts due to the unequal skipping efficiency of individual AOs.[26] Reducing the number of AOs used in a cocktail—depending on mutation patterns in the patients—or developing a new strategy with fewer AOs to induce skipping of the entire exons 45–55 region, regardless of the mutation patterns, may prevent unexpected effects and lead to formation of intended dystrophin proteins more effectively. Such advancements would aid in forwarding this strategy and other multiple exon skipping strategies into clinical application.[33] In addition, sequence-specific AO cocktails optimized for the human DMD gene will need to be tested with human DMD patient skeletal muscle cell lines. Currently, the drug regulatory authorities consider individual AOs targeting different sequences to be separate drugs. This stance may need to be changed for developing cocktail drugs. Nevertheless, the results of this study should contribute not only to the clinical development of an exon 45–55 skipping therapy for DMD, but should also open up the possibility of using antisense drug cocktails for other genetic diseases in which long-term administration is required.

Material and methods

Animals. Eight-week-old male exon 52–deficient mdx52 mice were used in this study. As a control in the systemic treatment, male WT C57BL/6J mice at 6 months old were used for comparing to treated mdx52 at the end-point of the treatment. All mice were housed in an individually ventilated cage system with a 12-hour light–dark cycle; they received standard mouse chow (Harlan Teklad, Madison, WI) and water ad libitum. All mice were allowed to rest for at least 7 days in the facility before acclimatizing them on the instruments and taking baseline readings for behavioral assays. All mice were handled according to local Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) guidelines (University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada and Children's National Medical Center, Worthington, DC). Antisense oligonucleotides. Ten AOs targeted to exons 45–51 and 53–55 in mouse dystrophin gene were designed using ESEfinder software to anneal to the exon-splicing enhancer sites of each exon or exon/intron boundary, as previously described ().[26,27] Specificity of the designed AOs was confirmed by NCBI blast software (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), which shows that our AO sequences theoretically do not bind any untargeted RNA sequences in 100% identity. All sequences were synthesized using vPMO backbones (Gene-Tools, LLC, Philomath, OR).[21] Vivo-Morpholino injections. Animals were anesthetized by inhalation of isoflurane (Baxter, Deerfield, IL) for injections. A total of 0.3 μg of vPMOs targeting exons 45–55 in a total volume of 36 μl of saline were injected into the TA muscle of mdx52 mice. Muscle samples were obtained 2 weeks after the intramuscular injection. For long-term systemic treatment, a total of 6 mg/kg per injection of 10-vPMOs (0.6 mg/kg for each) in 150 μl of saline was injected into the tail vein of mdx52 mice, nine times at 2-week intervals. The mice were examined 2 weeks after the final injection. Muscle samples were obtained immediately after the mice were killed. The samples were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen–cooled isopentane and stored at −80 °C before use. RT-PCR. Total RNA from muscle sections of WT, nontreated mdx52, and treated mdx52 mice were extracted as previously described.[47] Total RNA template (200 ng) was used for a 25 μl RT-PCR with the SuperScript III One-Step RT-PCR System (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and 0.2 μmol/l of each primer, in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Primer sequences for the PCR were designed with Primer3Plus software: Exon 44_F, CAGTTGAAAAATGGCGACAC and Exon 56_R, GTAACAGGGGTGCTTCATCC. The cycling conditions were as follows: 55 °C for 30 minutes; 94 °C for 2 minutes; 35 cycles at 94 °C for 15 seconds, 60 °C for 30 seconds, and 68 °C for 1.2 minutes; and 68 °C for 5 minutes. PCR products were separated on a 2% agarose gel and then visualized by SYBR Safe DNA Gel Stain (Invitrogen). Skipping percentage was calculated as using ImageJ software (NIH). Bands of the expected size for the transcript were extracted with a gel extraction kit (Promega, Madison, WI). The sequencing reactions were performed with Big Dye Terminator v3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Immunohistochemistry. Sections (7 μm thickness) of the TA muscle after single intramuscular injection were incubated with two anti-dystrophin antibodies: mouse monoclonal DYS1 against peptides encoded by exons 26–30 (1:200; Novocastra Laboratories, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK) and rabbit polyclonal P7 against peptides encoded by exon 57 (1:200; Fairway BioTech, Shrewsbury, UK). For quantification of the number of dystrophin-positive fibers, we made several tissue sections and selected representative sections of TA muscles, then stained these sections with DYS1 antibody (n = 3). The number of dystrophin-positive fibers were counted in sections having at least 200 total muscle fibers using a BZ-9000 fluorescence microscope (Keyence, Osaka, Japan), as previously described.[48] In systemic treatment with the 10-vPMO cocktail, the diaphragm, biceps femoris, quadriceps, gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior, biceps brachii, triceps brachii, and heart muscles were examined 2 weeks after the final injection using anti-dystrophin (P7) antibody and antibodies against dystrophin-associated proteins: anti-α1-syntrophin rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:200, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-nNOS rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:100, Invitrogen), anti-α-sarcoglycan mouse monoclonal antibody (1:10, Novocastra Laboratories), and anti-β-dystroglycan mouse monoclonal antibody (1:5, Novocastra Laboratories). To detect the primary antibodies, Alexa Fluor 594–conjugated goat antimouse or rabbit IgG (1:2,000; Invitrogen) were used as secondary antibodies. To examine IgG accumulation in muscle fibers and immune response to the vPMO cocktail, anti-mouse IgG F(ab')2 (1:750, Invitrogen) and anti-CD3 rabbit monoclonal (1:25, Abcam) antibodies were used on nonfixed and 4% PFA-fixed sections (7 μm thickness), respectively. The number of IgG-positive fibers and sporadic CD3-positive cells as pan T cells were counted in 10 section areas randomly selected through a 20× objective lens. In immunostaining against CD3 antigen, cells were regarded as positive when more than half the membrane circumference was stained on cross-sections. Hematoxylin and eosin staining. For counting CNFs, muscle sections (7 μm thickness) were stained with Mayer's hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) solutions and images were taken with a DMR microscope (Leica Micro-systems, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK) with a 20× objective lens, as previously described.[49] The percentage of CNFs was calculated in 400–1,100 fibers in DIA, BF, QUA, GC, and TA muscles of nontreated (n = 4) and treated mdx52 mice (n = 6–7). Western blotting. Protein extraction from frozen muscle sections and Western blot analysis were performed as previously described.[47] In brief, 10 and 1% (4 and 0.4 μg of protein, respectively) of the TA muscle from WT mice were used as a positive control, 40 μg of protein of the TA muscle from nontreated mdx52 mice were used as a negative control, and 40 μg of protein from the indicated muscles of treated mdx52 mice were loaded onto a NuPAGE Novex 3–8% Tris-Acetate Midi Gel (Invitrogen) and separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis at 150 V for 75 minutes. The proteins were transferred onto an Immobilon PVDF membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA) by semidry blotting at 20 V of constant voltage for 70 minutes. The membrane was blocked with phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween 20, 0.1% casein, and 0.1% gelatin, then incubated with the DYS1 monoclonal antibody (1:400 in blocking solution) at 4 °C overnight. Using ImageJ software, the intensities of the bands were compared with those from WT muscles, as previously described.[48] Myosin heavy chain (MyHC) stained by Coomassie Brilliant Blue was used as a loading control. Muscle function test. The grip strength test for hind and forelimbs of the mice was performed 2 weeks after the eighth of the every 2 weeks intravenous injections, as previously described.[50] Biochemical blood test. Serum samples were collected from WT mice, nontreated and treated mdx52 mice 2 weeks after the final injection of vPMO cocktail. Serum biochemical parameters of creatine kinase, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, total bilirubin, and γ-GTP were assayed with the Fuji Drychem system (Fuji Film Medical, Tokyo, Japan). Statistical analysis. For analysis of dystrophin-positive fibers in the locally injected TA muscle and CNFs in the systemic treatment, statistical differences were assessed by F test and Student's t-test. Mann–Whitney U-test was performed to analyze the number of IgG-positive fibers and CD3-positive cells. One-way analysis of variance with a Tukey–Kramer multiple-comparison test was performed for statistical analysis of the serum biochemical test. Data are reported as mean values ± SD or ± SE. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Figure S1. Intramuscular (i.m.) injection of the 10-vPMO cocktail at 0.3 μg (0.03 μg of each vPMO).
Table 1

Sequences of antisense oligonucleotides used for a 10-vPMO cocktail to skip exons 45–55

  50 in total

1.  Morpholinos and their peptide conjugates: therapeutic promise and challenge for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Hong M Moulton; Jon D Moulton
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2010-02-17

2.  An octaguanidine-morpholino oligo conjugate improves muscle function of mdx mice.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Widrick; Shan Jiang; Seung Jun Choi; Shannon T Knuth; Paul A Morcos
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 3.  Skipping multiple exons of dystrophin transcripts using cocktail antisense oligonucleotides.

Authors:  Yusuke Echigoya; Toshifumi Yokota
Journal:  Nucleic Acid Ther       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 5.486

4.  Vivo-Morpholinos: a non-peptide transporter delivers Morpholinos into a wide array of mouse tissues.

Authors:  Paul A Morcos; Yongfu Li; Shan Jiang
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.993

5.  Increased myofibrillar protein catabolism in duchenne muscular dystrophy measured by 3-methylhistidine excretion in the urine.

Authors:  E Mussini; F Cornelio; L Colombo; G De Ponte; G Giudici; L Cotellessa; F Marcucci
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 6.  Theoretic applicability of antisense-mediated exon skipping for Duchenne muscular dystrophy mutations.

Authors:  Annemieke Aartsma-Rus; Ivo Fokkema; Jan Verschuuren; Ieke Ginjaar; Judith van Deutekom; Gert-Jan van Ommen; Johan T den Dunnen
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.878

7.  DMD transcript imbalance determines dystrophin levels.

Authors:  Pietro Spitali; Janneke C van den Bergen; Ingrid E C Verhaart; Beatrijs Wokke; Anneke A M Janson; Rani van den Eijnde; Johan T den Dunnen; Jeroen F J Laros; Jan J G M Verschuuren; Peter A C 't Hoen; Annemieke Aartsma-Rus
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Antisense therapy in neurology.

Authors:  Joshua J A Lee; Toshifumi Yokota
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2013-08-02

9.  Safety and efficacy of drisapersen for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DEMAND II): an exploratory, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study.

Authors:  Thomas Voit; Haluk Topaloglu; Volker Straub; Francesco Muntoni; Nicolas Deconinck; Giles Campion; Sjef J De Kimpe; Michelle Eagle; Michela Guglieri; Steve Hood; Lia Liefaard; Afrodite Lourbakos; Allison Morgan; Joanna Nakielny; Naashika Quarcoo; Valeria Ricotti; Katie Rolfe; Laurent Servais; Claire Wardell; Rosamund Wilson; Padraig Wright; John E Kraus
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 44.182

10.  Characteristics of Japanese Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy patients in a novel Japanese national registry of muscular dystrophy (Remudy).

Authors:  Harumasa Nakamura; En Kimura; Madoka Mori-Yoshimura; Hirofumi Komaki; Yu Matsuda; Kanako Goto; Yukiko K Hayashi; Ichizo Nishino; Shin'ichi Takeda; Mitsuru Kawai
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 4.123

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Duchenne muscular dystrophy animal models for high-throughput drug discovery and precision medicine.

Authors:  Nalinda B Wasala; Shi-Jie Chen; Dongsheng Duan
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 6.098

Review 2.  Dystrophin-deficient large animal models: translational research and exon skipping.

Authors:  Xinran Yu; Bo Bao; Yusuke Echigoya; Toshifumi Yokota
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 3.  Genome Editing in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells using CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  Ronen Ben Jehuda; Yuval Shemer; Ofer Binah
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.739

4.  In vivo gene editing in dystrophic mouse muscle and muscle stem cells.

Authors:  Mohammadsharif Tabebordbar; Kexian Zhu; Jason K W Cheng; Wei Leong Chew; Jeffrey J Widrick; Winston X Yan; Claire Maesner; Elizabeth Y Wu; Ru Xiao; F Ann Ran; Le Cong; Feng Zhang; Luk H Vandenberghe; George M Church; Amy J Wagers
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  A Single CRISPR-Cas9 Deletion Strategy that Targets the Majority of DMD Patients Restores Dystrophin Function in hiPSC-Derived Muscle Cells.

Authors:  Courtney S Young; Michael R Hicks; Natalia V Ermolova; Haruko Nakano; Majib Jan; Shahab Younesi; Saravanan Karumbayaram; Chino Kumagai-Cresse; Derek Wang; Jerome A Zack; Donald B Kohn; Atsushi Nakano; Stanley F Nelson; M Carrie Miceli; Melissa J Spencer; April D Pyle
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 24.633

6.  Autologous Cell Therapy Approach for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy using PiggyBac Transposons and Mesoangioblasts.

Authors:  Pavithra S Iyer; Lionel O Mavoungou; Flavio Ronzoni; Joanna Zemla; Emanuel Schmid-Siegert; Stefania Antonini; Laurence A Neff; Olivier M Dorchies; Marisa Jaconi; Malgorzata Lekka; Graziella Messina; Nicolas Mermod
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 11.454

7.  Exons 45-55 Skipping Using Mutation-Tailored Cocktails of Antisense Morpholinos in the DMD Gene.

Authors:  Yusuke Echigoya; Kenji Rowel Q Lim; Dyanna Melo; Bo Bao; Nhu Trieu; Yoshitaka Mizobe; Rika Maruyama; Kamel Mamchaoui; Jun Tanihata; Yoshitsugu Aoki; Shin'ichi Takeda; Vincent Mouly; William Duddy; Toshifumi Yokota
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 11.454

8.  Antisense Oligonucleotide Treatment in a Humanized Mouse Model of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Highly Sensitive Detection of Dystrophin Using Western Blotting.

Authors:  Rika Maruyama; Toshifumi Yokota
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

9.  Quantitative Antisense Screening and Optimization for Exon 51 Skipping in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

Authors:  Yusuke Echigoya; Kenji Rowel Q Lim; Nhu Trieu; Bo Bao; Bailey Miskew Nichols; Maria Candida Vila; James S Novak; Yuko Hara; Joshua Lee; Aleksander Touznik; Kamel Mamchaoui; Yoshitsugu Aoki; Shin'ichi Takeda; Kanneboyina Nagaraju; Vincent Mouly; Rika Maruyama; William Duddy; Toshifumi Yokota
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 10.  Ex vivo cell-based CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing for therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Yamin Li; Zachary Glass; Mingqian Huang; Zheng-Yi Chen; Qiaobing Xu
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.