Literature DB >> 25641510

Effect of submucosal fibrosis on endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal tumors: pathologic review of 173 cases.

Sang Pyo Lee1, Jeong Hwan Kim, In-Kyung Sung, Sun-Young Lee, Hyung Seok Park, Chan Sup Shim, Hye Seung Han.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is now commonly performed as a treatment for colorectal tumors. However, little is known about the relationship between submucosal fibrosis and the outcome of the colonic ESD procedure. The aims of this study were to investigate the relationship between the degree of submucosal fibrosis in colorectal tumors and the outcomes of ESD for these tumors and to evaluate the risk factors for submucosal fibrosis.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with colorectal adenoma or carcinoma who had undergone an ESD, during a four-year period from January 2010 to December 2013. The resected specimens were histologically examined after Masson's trichrome staining, and the severity of the submucosal fibrosis was classified as no fibrosis (F0), mild fibrosis (F1), or severe fibrosis (F2).
RESULTS: Among a total of 173 cases (106 male, mean age 65.0 ± 10.2 years; F0 33, F1 78, F2 62) enrolled, 46 incidences of complications (perforation 19, post-coagulation syndrome 21, bleeding 6) had developed. Multivariate analysis revealed that F2 fibrosis was significantly associated with the development of complications. Submucosal invasion and large tumor size (≥ 30 mm) were identified as independent predictors of F2 fibrosis.
CONCLUSION: Severe fibrosis is the most powerful risk factor for complications and can interfere with en bloc resections. The possibility of submucosal fibrosis should be considered, and the procedure should be cautiously performed in cases where the tumor diameter is greater than 30 mm and when submucosal cancer is suspected.
© 2015 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal tumor; endoscopic submucosal dissection; submucosal fibrosis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25641510     DOI: 10.1111/jgh.12886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  17 in total

Review 1.  Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Recent technical advances for safe and successful procedures.

Authors:  Katsumi Yamamoto; Tomoki Michida; Tsutomu Nishida; Shiro Hayashi; Masafumi Naito; Toshifumi Ito
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-10-10

2.  Effect of Preceding Biopsy on the Results of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Laterally Spreading Tumor.

Authors:  Sang Pyo Lee; In-Kyung Sung; Jeong Hwan Kim; Sun-Young Lee; Hyung Seok Park; Chan Sup Shim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Efficacy of the pocket-creation method with a traction device in endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions.

Authors:  Daisuke Ide; Tomohiko Richard Ohya; Mitsuaki Ishioka; Yuri Enomoto; Eisuke Nakao; Yuki Mitsuyoshi; Junki Tokura; Keigo Suzuki; Seiichi Yakabi; Chihiro Yasue; Akiko Chino; Masahiro Igarashi; Akio Nakashima; Masayuki Saruta; Shoichi Saito; Junko Fujisaki
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2022-05-31

4.  Factors for conversion risk of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Yuki Kamigaichi; Shiro Oka; Shinji Tanaka; Shinji Nagata; Masaki Kunihiro; Toshio Kuwai; Yuko Hiraga; Akira Furudoi; Seiji Onogawa; Hideharu Okanobu; Takeshi Mizumoto; Tomohiro Miwata; Shiro Okamoto; Kenichi Yoshimura; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 3.453

5.  Endoscopic Management of Large (≥2 cm) Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyps: Impact of Polyp Morphology on Outcomes.

Authors:  Seon Hee Lim; John M Levenick; Abraham Mathew; Matthew T Moyer; Charles E Dye; Thomas J McGarrity
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Factors Associated with Fibrosis during Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Does Pretreatment Biopsy Potentially Elicit Submucosal Fibrosis and Affect Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Outcomes?

Authors:  Masatake Kuroha; Hisashi Shiga; Yoshitake Kanazawa; Hiroshi Nagai; Tomoyuki Handa; Ryo Ichikawa; Motoyuki Onodera; Takeo Naito; Rintaro Moroi; Tomoya Kimura; Katsuya Endo; Yoichi Kakuta; Yoshitaka Kinouchi; Tooru Shimosegawa; Atsushi Masamune
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 7.  Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection from a Western perspective: Today's promises and future challenges.

Authors:  José Carlos Marín-Gabriel; Gloria Fernández-Esparrach; José Díaz-Tasende; Alberto Herreros de Tejada
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-01-25

8.  Usefulness of training using animal models for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: is experience performing gastric ESD really needed?

Authors:  Ken Ohata; Kouichi Nonaka; Yoshitsugu Misumi; Hiromichi Tsunashima; Maiko Takita; Yohei Minato; Tomoaki Tashima; Eiji Sakai; Takashi Muramoto; Yasushi Matsuyama; Yoshimitsu Hiejima; Nobuyuki Matsuhashi
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-02-10

9.  Safety and efficacy of simultaneous colorectal ESD for large synchronous colorectal lesions.

Authors:  Hideyuki Chiba; Jun Tachikawa; Daisuke Kurihara; Keiichi Ashikari; Toru Goto; Akihiro Takahashi; Eiji Sakai; Ken Ohata; Atsushi Nakajima
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-06-23

10.  The feasibility of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of residual or recurrent tumor localized in therapeutic scar tissue.

Authors:  Ryosuke Kobayashi; Kingo Hirasawa; Ryosuke Ikeda; Takeh de Fukuchi; Yasuaki Ishii; Hiroaki Kaneko; Makomo Makazu; Chiko Sato; Shin Maeda
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-12-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.