Literature DB >> 25640729

Mitochondria-nucleus network for genome stability.

Aneta Kaniak-Golik1, Adrianna Skoneczna2.   

Abstract

The proper functioning of the cell depends on preserving the cellular genome. In yeast cells, a limited number of genes are located on mitochondrial DNA. Although the mechanisms underlying nuclear genome maintenance are well understood, much less is known about the mechanisms that ensure mitochondrial genome stability. Mitochondria influence the stability of the nuclear genome and vice versa. Little is known about the two-way communication and mutual influence of the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes. Although the mitochondrial genome replicates independent of the nuclear genome and is organized by a distinct set of mitochondrial nucleoid proteins, nearly all genome stability mechanisms responsible for maintaining the nuclear genome, such as mismatch repair, base excision repair, and double-strand break repair via homologous recombination or the nonhomologous end-joining pathway, also act to protect mitochondrial DNA. In addition to mitochondria-specific DNA polymerase γ, the polymerases α, η, ζ, and Rev1 have been found in this organelle. A nuclear genome instability phenotype results from a failure of various mitochondrial functions, such as an electron transport chain activity breakdown leading to a decrease in ATP production, a reduction in the mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨ), and a block in nucleotide and amino acid biosynthesis. The loss of ΔΨ inhibits the production of iron-sulfur prosthetic groups, which impairs the assembly of Fe-S proteins, including those that mediate DNA transactions; disturbs iron homeostasis; leads to oxidative stress; and perturbs wobble tRNA modification and ribosome assembly, thereby affecting translation and leading to proteotoxic stress. In this review, we present the current knowledge of the mechanisms that govern mitochondrial genome maintenance and demonstrate ways in which the impairment of mitochondrial function can affect nuclear genome stability.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage; DNA repair; Genome maintenance; Heme protein; Iron–sulfur cluster; Membrane potential; Metal toxicity; Oxidative stress; Protein assembly; rho(0)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25640729     DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med        ISSN: 0891-5849            Impact factor:   7.376


  29 in total

1.  Daughters of the budding yeast from old mothers have shorter replicative lifespans but not total lifespans. Are DNA damage and rDNA instability the factors that determine longevity?

Authors:  Mateusz Molon; Anita Panek; Eliza Molestak; Marek Skoneczny; Marek Tchorzewski; Maciej Wnuk
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-07-15       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Circulating mitochondria in organ donors promote allograft rejection.

Authors:  Liwen Lin; He Xu; Muath Bishawi; FeiFei Feng; Kannan Samy; George Truskey; Andrew S Barbas; Allan D Kirk; Todd V Brennan
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 3.  Genetic instability in budding and fission yeast-sources and mechanisms.

Authors:  Adrianna Skoneczna; Aneta Kaniak; Marek Skoneczny
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 16.408

Review 4.  Chronic oxidative damage together with genome repair deficiency in the neurons is a double whammy for neurodegeneration: Is damage response signaling a potential therapeutic target?

Authors:  Haibo Wang; Prakash Dharmalingam; Velmarini Vasquez; Joy Mitra; Istvan Boldogh; K S Rao; Thomas A Kent; Sankar Mitra; Muralidhar L Hegde
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 5.432

5.  Loss of Mitochondrial Localization of Human FANCG Causes Defective FANCJ Helicase.

Authors:  Jagadeesh Chandra Bose K; Bishwajit Singh Kapoor; Kamal Mandal; Shubhrima Ghosh; Raveendra B Mokhamatam; Sunil K Manna; Sudit S Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Biomarkers of nucleic acid oxidation - A summary state-of-the-art.

Authors:  Mu-Rong Chao; Mark D Evans; Chiung-Wen Hu; Yunhee Ji; Peter Møller; Pavel Rossner; Marcus S Cooke
Journal:  Redox Biol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 11.799

Review 7.  The redox biology network in cancer pathophysiology and therapeutics.

Authors:  Gina Manda; Gheorghita Isvoranu; Maria Victoria Comanescu; Adrian Manea; Bilge Debelec Butuner; Kemal Sami Korkmaz
Journal:  Redox Biol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 11.799

8.  Low doses of ultraviolet radiation and oxidative damage induce dramatic accumulation of mitochondrial DNA replication intermediates, fork regression, and replication initiation shift.

Authors:  Rubén Torregrosa-Muñumer; Steffi Goffart; Juha A Haikonen; Jaakko L O Pohjoismäki
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 4.138

9.  Topoisomerase II deficiency leads to a postreplicative structural shift in all Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosomes.

Authors:  Jessel Ayra-Plasencia; Cristina Ramos-Pérez; Silvia Santana-Sosa; Oliver Quevedo; Sara Medina-Suárez; Emiliano Matos-Perdomo; Marcos Zamora-Dorta; Grant W Brown; Michael Lisby; Félix Machín
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Cancer-associated isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations induce mitochondrial DNA instability.

Authors:  Joanne M Kingsbury; Nachiketha Shamaprasad; R Blake Billmyre; Joseph Heitman; Maria E Cardenas
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2016-07-17       Impact factor: 5.121

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.