Literature DB >> 25640646

Hospital Surgical Volume and Associated Postoperative Complications of Pediatric Urological Surgery in the United States.

Hsin-Hsiao S Wang1, Rohit Tejwani2, Haijing Zhang2, John S Wiener1, Jonathan C Routh3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Hospital and provider surgical volume have been increasingly linked to surgical outcomes. However, this topic has rarely been addressed in children. We investigated whether hospital surgical volume impacts complication rates in pediatric urology.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (1998 to 2011) for pediatric (18 years or younger) hospitalizations for urological procedures. We used ICD-9-CM codes to identify elective urological interventions and NSQIP® postoperative in hospital complications. Annual hospital surgical volume was calculated and dichotomized as high volume (90th percentile or above) or non-high volume (below 90th percentile).
RESULTS: We identified 158,805 urological admissions (114,634 high volume and 44,171 non-high volume hospitals). Of the hospitals 75% recorded fewer than 5 major pediatric urology cases performed yearly. High volume hospitals showed treatment of significantly younger patients (mean 5.4 vs 9.6 years, p < 0.001) and were more likely to be teaching hospitals (93% vs 71%, p < 0.001). The overall rate of NSQIP identified postoperative complications was higher at non-high volume vs high volume hospitals (11.6% vs 9.3%, p = 0.003). After adjusting for confounding effects patients treated at non-high volume hospitals remained more likely to suffer multiple NSQIP tracked postoperative complications, including acute renal failure (OR 1.4, p = 0.04), urinary tract infection (OR 1.3, p = 0.01), postoperative respiratory complications (OR 1.5, p = 0.01), systemic sepsis (OR 2.0, p ≤ 0.001), postoperative bleeding (OR 2.5, p < 0.001) and in hospital death (OR 2.2, p = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: Urological procedures performed in children at non-high volume hospitals were associated with an increased risk of in hospital, NSQIP identified postoperative complications, including a small but significant increase in postoperative mortality, mostly following nephrectomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  high-volume; hospitals; low-volume; pediatrics; postoperative complications; urologic surgical procedures

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25640646      PMCID: PMC4509970          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  27 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature.

Authors:  Ethan A Halm; Clara Lee; Mark R Chassin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  S F Khuri; J Daley; W Henderson; K Hur; J Demakis; J B Aust; V Chong; P J Fabri; J O Gibbs; F Grover; K Hammermeister; G Irvin; G McDonald; E Passaro; L Phillips; F Scamman; J Spencer; J F Stremple
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.

Authors:  A Elixhauser; C Steiner; D R Harris; R M Coffey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  The relation between surgical volume and mortality: an exploration of causal factors and alternative models.

Authors:  H S Luft
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality.

Authors:  H S Luft; J P Bunker; A C Enthoven
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-12-20       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The volume-outcome relationship: practice-makes-perfect or selective-referral patterns?

Authors:  H S Luft; S S Hunt; S C Maerki
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Variation in hospital mortality rates with inpatient cancer surgery.

Authors:  Sandra L Wong; ShaʼShonda L Revels; Huiying Yin; Andrew K Stewart; Andrea McVeigh; Mousumi Banerjee; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Role of surgeon volume in radical prostatectomy outcomes.

Authors:  Jim C Hu; Karen F Gold; Chris L Pashos; Shilpa S Mehta; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Therese A Stukel; Andrea E Siewers; Philip P Goodney; David E Wennberg; F Lee Lucas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-11-27       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  [Bladder exstrophy: Quality of primary care and long-term prognosis].

Authors:  W H Rösch; M Promm
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Open versus minimally invasive surgical approaches in pediatric urology: Trends in utilization and complications.

Authors:  Rohit Tejwani; Brian J Young; Hsin-Hsiao S Wang; Steven Wolf; J Todd Purves; John S Wiener; Jonathan C Routh
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 1.830

3.  Increased pediatric sub-specialization is associated with decreased surgical complication rates for inpatient pediatric urology procedures.

Authors:  R Tejwani; H-H S Wang; B J Young; N H Greene; S Wolf; J S Wiener; J C Routh
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 1.830

4.  The impact of surgeon volume on patient outcome in spine surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Azeem Tariq Malik; Usman Younis Panni; Muhammad Usman Mirza; Maryam Tetlay; Shahryar Noordin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Postoperative complications after gastrointestinal pediatric surgical procedures: outcomes and socio-demographic risk factors.

Authors:  Robert Brock; Angel Chu; Shengjie Lu; Mary Elizabeth Brindle; Ranjani Somayaji
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 2.567

6.  Relative to open surgery, minimally-invasive renal and ureteral pediatric surgery offers no improvement in 30-day complications, yet requires longer operative time: Data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatrics.

Authors:  Marc Colaco; Austin Hester; William Visser; Alison Rasper; Ryan Terlecki
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2018-04-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.